HumbleNinja said:
Point being the statement itself is meant to mean by anyone who reads it:
Alpha fvcks, beta bucks = Alphas always fvck women for free, betas always pay something. As if "Alphas" game is so strong they "never" pay for any chicks period and a beta has "no game" and always pays for something for a chick even if it's hardly anything in hopes of getting laid.
Sht a dude could fvck a 4 for free or have a whale pay for him and claim "alpha" off that statement while some other poster could be taking out a 9 for coffee and someone would claim he's "beta" because he's paying for her coffee (and because she MUST have sometime in her life fvcked some dude for free. No proof. The dude should simply believe it..)
It's a weak azz laughable shaming tactic for dudes who are either broke or too cheap and insecure as hell and need other dudes to follow suit to "punish" chicks because deep down they feel chicks will only like them for their money.
If a chick is cool and you have a good time together and she doesn't give off a user vibe and contributes. Fine.
If she's simply a jump off I'd agree to spend little if anything at all.
Disclaimer: I am NOT an Alpha.
I haven't dug deep into the Alpha Fux Beta Bux theory. Hell, we can start referring it to AFBB since it comes up so much. When you think of women as
investments, you are going to be broke. You don't need money, cars, houses or anything to fvck women. I have fvcked many women this past year just with a bottle of Jack Daniels. Most of them came off the first date.
The AFBB is really a moment realization. The moment where you completely pull the rug from the pvssy hierarchy. Perhaps I realized it this past year where I was a BETA and not understanding why women gave it away to me for free. The moment of clarity was when I'm not an Alpha, but pvssy no longer has value.
