Search results

You're likely so far down the list that you will have at least six months to see what's happening with the vaccination program. Turns out my GF enrolled in a 3rd-stage safety trial of one of the Covid vaccine candidates (an inactivated-virus type), which she got on Saturday. It's a blind study...

Covidgay? Really? I bow to your wordsmithing prowess, and the immense credibility it lends to your arguments.

Strong arguments you've presented there. I'm a bit curious that you stopped at accusing me of being a woman. If you're going to resort to insults, why not call me a tranny? Or pick your favorite denigration. All of which shows that you're basically out of arguments and have moved on to the...

As a member of the Reality-Based Community, the very same could be said of you my friend.

Ummm.... @stovepipe told us something, and he's questioning it. Gaslight much? Maybe you're the woman...

Unclear that it's dangerous, but it is disingenuous. I personally haven't seen anyone called a conspiracy theorist in response to the viewpoint you describe, but I suppose it happens. That viewpoint is very different than insisting that governments, media outlets, and businesses world-wide are...

You hit the core of one of my issues with conspiracy theories, and why extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence: large scale conspiracies are so difficult to maintain that eventually their demise is all but certain. While this is only one man's assessment on the subject, it makes for...

Wow, it's almost like you are aware of the Broken Window Fallacy in economics! https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/broken-window-fallacy.asp#:~:text=The%20broken%20window%20fallacy%20suggests,negative%20economic%20effects%20of%20war.

I don't see media outlets panicking, I see you panicking. And what exceptional evidence do you have for your exceptional claims? What makes your information sources reliable? Looks to me like they are baselessly stirring up fear and paranoia. Kinda like they're panicking. As for false...

Be afraid, for the fearmongers tell you so.

Agreed on that. Just before Covid I joined my GF for the tail end of her trip to Costa Rica. In 48 hours I had fifty matches, a dozen of them I would have totally pursued if I had the time and availability. Killed me to swipe left on all of them...

Your filter pretty much lines up with mine. And your results line up with mine as well. Such is the dumpster fire that is Tinder.

There are plenty of other news sources that show Project Veritas to be a site that masquerades as journalism but has a long history of releasing deceptively-edited videos to support a partisan agenda. But had I quoted one of those, no doubt I'd be hit with "fake news" or "you can't trust the...

A blatantly partisan "news" web site which has repeatedly come under scrutiny for deceptive reporting, but supports your worldview? A-Ok! A bland, boring, largely neutral web site that primarily acts as an open repository for information but has some content that challenges your worldview...

Really? Is that the best you've got? Evidence? You do realize that Wikipedia is funded largely by donation, right? You do realize that anyone can make edits to the information, even people under the influence of the Delusional Fog, right?

Not to mention Foggy Bottom!

What an unbiased, reputable source ya got there. Nice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Veritas

False Equivalency. Enforcing public health guidelines when citizens are not voluntarily choosing to do so is not mass control. No more than DWI, seat belt laws, reckless endangerment laws, disruption-of-the-peace regulations, etc. As they say, "your freedom to throw a punch ends at the tip of...

Exceptional claims require exceptional evidence. Evasion. Ad hominem.

I'll respectfully put out the notion that you may be applying mutual exclusivity where none exists. For example, someone can have an agenda but still be right (for some definitions of "right"). Otherwise known as: "doing the right thing for the wrong reasons". I'll also ask that you...