This is an interesting point of view. Acquiring a Rolex to increase our chances of some broad dropping her panties has become more of a thing since the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s. Many men have had this thought process. SoSuave is not the only internet forum where this topic has been discussed. I also seem to remember Rollo Tomassi mentioning men considering Rolex/other luxury watches as a means of getting laid in either "Rational Male" or "Rational Male: Players Handbook".
A Rolex never comes alone.
If you can afford a Rolex you can afford other things in life that MIGHT get you noticed quicker. Just facts. A man with a Rolex probably has some cash to burn, a fly car and crib, knows how to hustle ect.
The moment such a man goes broke the rolex is probably the first thing to go, so as long as you wear it things allegedly are going great for you.
To say otherwise is cap. Just wearing and showing a Rolex won't get you laid, buy I assume it's one of the last assets a man gets after he got " all of the rest". So YES, a Rolex =a testimony of your ability to grind and make money and that will ALWAYS get you noticed by women.
I think this is absolutely irrelevant to your success in seduction. Unless you are luring some low quality gold digger women. But still, without game, you won't go further.
When I met my "ex", I had around 8.56 in my bank account. This should answer your question.
That's just anecdotal, a specific case. If I had to choose between being a dude with 8 bucks on the bank or a dude with a Rolex, I'd rather be the latter.
No knock on you and I am not saying if you had a Rolex you would still be with her. I've been broke since birth and long after, and fecked the finest women. But...if I did had my shyte together I would have way more succes and abundance.
Being broke and getting women sounds cool because it's contradictory to the common believe that women chase money. But it's also a fools game because
man must money
