SW15
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- May 31, 2020
- Messages
- 13,289
- Reaction score
- 11,253
If they are truly MGTOW, they won't be pursuing LTRs/marriages. If a man remains in the marketplace, then half assed PUA is better than remaining a blue pill, beta male chump.at least a half assed pua would have some sort of options and experience compared to 90 percent of men out there. Not dating and not taking action completely rears inexperience and inexperienced men tend to be the ones most at risk from being exploited in marriage or LTRS.
Handling rejections requires thick skin. Many men are too sensitive for the rejections. Some might have the ability to handle rejections better over time. Some men will not see an improve in their own ability to psychologically handle the rejections.rejections hurt for the first year or two then after a while you get used to it once some positive feedback comes and helps .
What feedback are you referring to? Women generally do not give you feedback after a failed first date or failed initial approach. The feedback a man gets from women is through her actions. It's either pass/fail.
Some men might have a male friend that is competent at seduction and would be able to give real world feedback on some daygame or nightgame. Another thing that a male approacher could do is wear a GoPro and capture some footage of his approaches. Then, he could send the footage to a pickup artist online or a competent male friend.
Men who use swipe apps often post screenshots of text-based chats on forums like SoSuave. Text message threads from any sort of meeting type can also be posted.
It is true that experienced approachers have a high failure rate on their approaches.Of course for most men even high value men cold approach will be 80-90 percent rejection which will be filled with unpleasant dates and lmr.
Even if a man has a successful in-person approach and arranges a date, there's a good chance that the first date will still be a "one date, no sex, no second date" type interaction. With that said, a man does typically reduce his ""one date, no sex, no second date" by approaching in the real world as compared to swiping.
Sometimes a man has a "one date, no sex, no second date" interaction because the woman on the date is awful. The typical "one date, no sex, no second date" interaction is when the man offers a second date and the woman ghosts or sends some lame text message like "I had a good time but do not see this relationship going forward".
This sounds normal to me. Dealing with the rejection is tough. I've been dating in large Western cities in the USA during my adult life. It's not easy. Women, especially White women, in these large Western cities are extremely selective and demanding. Women in major USA and Western European cities have unprecedented abundance.I know of people who were initially successful at cold approach but gave up due to the repeated rejections or didn't have the mental will to carry on- dating in this modern age is a bigger willpower drain on men imo particularly in western cities.
Online game tends to have more flakes because it is very easy to flake on some abstract person. In online game, the initial game is done behind an electronic screen and feels less real.Online game for me had far more flakes - daygame at least you're able to exert some initial demonstrations of confidence and personality for me it helped reduce a lot of flakes
In daygame, there has already been an in-person experience and that always helps to reduce flaking. If a daygame prospect flakes, she flakes before the first date and you haven't wasted the cost of the first date. Tech arranged dates lead to a first date where the man absorbs the cost of the initial in-person interaction.
It is not a good experience to have a daygame prospect flake, but it is better than when an online prospect flakes.