AmsterdamAssassin
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2023
- Messages
- 7,034
- Reaction score
- 6,103
No way. I love it when other people's postings are rife with mistakes. Like surrounding yourself with ugly people.
No, I didn't 'forget'. I do that on purpose. Just like I don't capitalise my poetry.lol In that case, you should proof read your writing better as well. You forgot to capitalize two sentences here. Starting a sentence with “and” is also improper English.
Haha thats funny. Truth be told, I can write perfectly fine. I know my spelling and grammar on this site isn’t always perfect. That’s mostly because I normally write from my phone and fairly quickly here. Plus, you guys don’t pay my bills. I also don’t write to please the grammar police. I have more of those badges if anyone else wants one. I can make it pink if people want that. lolNo, I didn't 'forget'. I do that on purpose. Just like I don't capitalise my poetry.
View attachment 11474
Just to annoy people like you.
I know all the rules, but I don't write to please my English teacher. Or the Grammar Police.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
My post said "I doubt you would bully your boss"[1]. Picking on people without power, but saying nothing to those with power - that seems like a bully to me. There's a difference between standing up to someone and being a bully.Imagine giving your son advice "Hey son don't stand up to your annoying coworker, he might get a promotion and then you're screwed", most men are indeed weak.
[2]I doubt you would bully your boss by saying "I don't like you trying to correct me when I make mistakes... When I need your helps, I'll ask for it". If you say that to a co-worker, and they later get promoted to your manager ... you're screwed.
[3]I would taking him in a place alone and be like "Hey man, I don't like you trying to correct me when I make mistakes, or those jokes that you make, if you have a problem with me, talk to me or my boss" Those people are fvcking annoying and are the first puzzies who complain when you make fun of them.
He will be like "I'm just trying to help you, don't take it personally"
I would be like "When I need your helps, I'll ask for it"
Ok be a puzzy the whole life to stand up to people then. That sounds fun
I think what is going to save me with this guy is my boss. My boss is super cool and he has said that this guy is a jerk. He also made a comment to me that "(Jerk guy) is NOT your boss, I am. You do not have to listen to him if you choose not to". So officially in a work context I think I will be fine. For me, my original post was actually about trying to adapt to new cultures and figure out if this is normal. Then the second thing is figuring out how to handle my interactions with this guy on a daily basis and not do or say anything I might regret. His cyber security/cybercrime experience is far less than mine. I have worked with it in some way since 1999 including in a sworn law enforcement capacity. He has only worked with it since 2017 and only as a civilian, not as a LEO.To make work easier, are you willing to make him feel even more superior?
Then ask him to help proofread some of the emails you send to everyone. You won't feel good about the situation - but he can't complain about an email he proofreads, can he? If you're on the fence... don't make me point out the typos in your message above. I suspect he's actually annoyed by those typos. The way your co-worker adheres strictly to every rule makes me suspect he's German.
How does the co-worker's cyber security experience compare to yours?
This will just create a hostile work environment imho. The dude will retire in 3 years. If he goes to HR, assuming that HR does anything in this environment as this has been happening for a while now, it will antagonize the old head and cause him to more covertly harass OP and create tension in their cooperation at work. Assuming it does work out well and he stops, then great.He also apparently is putting his company at legal risk by continuing to create a hostile work environment via his disparaging racial comments that are not only crass but also highly illegal in a workplace environment, as in company gets sued and settles for millions of dollars illegal.
This isn't about him. This is about a company that is literally potentially risking legal action that would create severe financial compensation to employees and/or heavy fines if someone decides to pursue legal action.This will just create a hostile work environment imho. The dude will retire in 3 years. If he goes to HR, assuming that HR does anything in this environment as this has been happening for a while now, it will antagonize the old head and cause him to more covertly harass OP and create tension in their cooperation at work. Assuming it does work out well and he stops, then great.
At the end of the day, the old heads criticism is valid. Tons of grammatical mistakes shouldn't be made, especially when there's literally a spellchecker in every single email/document program.
This is likely the last thing HR wants to be dealing with during these times. I'm seeing HR staff being laid off, budgets being cut, having to fire/lay off others on massive scales, handle benefit cases, they probably don't want to be handling grown men complaining about grammar and not being nice.
Just be the bigger man, and spellcheck your writing. If it continues after that, you can escalate.
I work in management for a massive corporation (top 30 in the world) and I am sharing from my personal experience. If this has been going on for a while, likely nothing is going to be done about it in this environment when **** is hitting the fan as most work places. It seems to have been tolerated. Not ideal but it is what it is. HR likely turning a blind eye and the company and client likely don't care or are accepting of this.This isn't about him. This is about a company that is literally potentially risking legal action that would create severe financial compensation to employees and/or heavy fines if someone decides to pursue legal action.
HR departments mostly care about how much legal/financial risk you are exposing them to by being employed there so trust me, that is the FIRST THING they would want to know about.
Making those type of jokes/comments has no place at any business that wants to stay in business.
Dude it doesn't matter what they "allow". This is where companies f ck up because they act as if their policies override actual laws. They don't.I work in management for a massive corporation (top 30 in the world) and I am sharing from my personal experience. If this has been going on for a while, likely nothing is going to be done about it in this environment when **** is hitting the fan as most work places. It seems to have been tolerated. Not ideal but it is what it is. HR likely turning a blind eye and the company and client likely don't care or are accepting of this.
In a healthy economy, what you said about HR departments is accurate. In this environment with financial tension spreading, they are less worried about that. Entire DEI divisions are being wiped out. Caring about your "feelings" when bankruptcies are increasing, everyone is constantly upset and complaining, and budget for company culture/diversity/branding will all come after surviving and revenue. This is why I originally sad, i would have just addressed it myself publicly and called him out but when the old dude is on his way out and literally is displaying IDGAF attitude, OP has more to lose than he has to gain. You definitely don't want to be complaining during these times about trivial stuff like "he told me to fix my spelling mistakes" when people have more important sh1t to worry about.
Putting people in their place works when the other party has something to lose. Given that this guy is on his way out, spent many more years at this current company, and OP is brand new there, OP doesn't seem to have much to gain and more to lose given that he's newer, he's still learning to work with people at the company, he's complaining, etc.
As a manager, the worst people are the ones that create problems for me as a manager that can't resolve them amicably among staff. I likely wouldn't be hiring people who are acting like the old dude in the first place, but as a manager the last thing I want to hear is HR pulling me into an office and sharing that my 2 direct reports are bickering over xyz. This does not help move the team towards our objectives nor the individual toward objectives, and the newbie that is complaining potentially labeling himself as a softy.
Not saying they will allow it, i'm saying it may not actually solve the problem and create more problems than OP actually wants. Complaining and crying is less effective than trying to resolve the situation yourself either through aggressive actions or pacifistic actions.Dude it doesn't matter what they "allow". This is where companies f ck up because they act as if their policies override actual laws. They don't.
They will eventually learn a very expensive lesson on this.
Not saying they will allow it, i'm saying it may not actually solve the problem and create more problems than OP actually wants. Complaining and crying is less effective than trying to resolve the situation yourself either through aggressive actions or pacifistic actions.
Where did you get the 30 years (i must have missed that)? I don't see anything about violating labor laws. He seems normal to most co-workers (according to OP) and only OP is having this issue. Seems a lot of things are still up for interpretation.Once he goes to HR he is immediately afforded whistleblower/retaliation protections under Federal Law.
That would be another expensive lesson they would end up learning
Nothing aggressive about it. The dude has been violating Labor Laws for 30 years and they have done nothing about it.
HR is required under U.S. federal and state labor laws to conduct an internal investigation, by interviewing all employees.How HR will address this is they will take the report and document it. Whether its actionable or not.
Oh, and here I assumed you moved to a new job (less experience) and he was about to retire (more experience)... You can use your far greater cybercrime experience to correct him - to nitpick on him.I think what is going to save me with this guy is my boss. My boss is super cool and he has said that this guy is a jerk. He also made a comment to me that "(Jerk guy) is NOT your boss, I am. You do not have to listen to him if you choose not to". So officially in a work context I think I will be fine. For me, my original post was actually about trying to adapt to new cultures and figure out if this is normal. Then the second thing is figuring out how to handle my interactions with this guy on a daily basis and not do or say anything I might regret. His cyber security/cybercrime experience is far less than mine. I have worked with it in some way since 1999 including in a sworn law enforcement capacity. He has only worked with it since 2017 and only as a civilian, not as a LEO.
This is the behavior of someone who feels threatened by the new person with more experience.Oh, and here I assumed you moved to a new job (less experience) and he was about to retire (more experience)... You can use your far greater cybercrime experience to correct him - to nitpick on him.
You could start replying to his nitpicks by asking "Did the boss say to do that?" You and your co-worker follow the boss, not whatever annoys your co-worker.
I haven't tried it, but "grammarly" is a tool to fix typos/grammar/etc. If you resolve half of this guys nitpicks by using a tool, that could also make things more tolerable.