What is 'right' and 'wrong' is up to the individual.
We can argue over the semantics of it, but ultimately it comes down to whatever moral compass that person has created. For some cheating may be immoral, for others not...
Why argue over it? Everyone is entitled to feel a certain way... and to attempt to change someone's view on the matter is a waste of time an energy. Citing empiricism to rationalize a viewpoint doesn't mean that viewpoint is 'correct', it is simply your view point.
Facts are objective and opinions are subjective ideas held by individuals and so are always biased.
A fact is a true statement and
that is not the same thing as a statement of truth. Facts lead to a specific point in time with a specific circumstance.
Facts, numbers, studies or whatever form of empiricism you utilize changes with time, with more research, with changing viewpoints, with conflicting results and so on. Focusing solely on empirical data leads you to a narrow viewpoint and develops self limiting belief systems and reaffirms confirmation biases. Things are not so black and white.
I’d never cheated on a relationship before, but once I did, I was in pain and guilt. Continuing to cheat more didn’t resolve anything. It was selfish on my part. What this helped me realise is that I cheated due to my expectations not being met. Even when some of those expectations weren’t justified. My woman’s unavailability when I wanted to communicate, meet etc pissed me off because I didn’t trust her. The issue is, even when she hasn’t given me any real reason, and has just showered love on me. Ironically, I broke her trust due to my own trust issues.I’ve realised that it can hurt the person who betrays just like the person who got betrayed. This helps me understand that not everyone is inherently untrustworthy, and even someone breaks your trust, they would regret and feel guilt and pain, they will suffer. Maybe with the loss of someone who loved them, or in silence with the guilt/pain.
Mr.Darksprezzatura knows himself very well (
clearly) and we can only project what we think is 'correct' from our frame of reference. A moral compass is the person's ability to judge what is right and wrong and act accordingly from their point of view. What defines that right or wrong comes down to the person. I think op views his actions as amoral.
@catsmeow2 I read the article and made a lengthy write up,
but ended up canning it. I'm checking out of this, we've reached reddit levels of arguing here. I agree and disagree with many of the views expressed here in this thread, but have no inclination to 'fight' or oppose anyones views beyond this point.
I genuinely hope
@darksprezzatura get's himself sorted and wish him well. We've all got our demons