Thanks broComing in with some straight fire with these write ups.
Thanks broComing in with some straight fire with these write ups.
I disagree with this. If most men can and do stay monogamous despite the physical need to unload and relatively easy access to pvssy (either paid directly or indirectly, depending on location and lifestyle) you mean to tell me that women, who don't even orgasm via penetrative sex in +50% cases can't stay monogamous? It doesn't compute.I disagree with this. If most men can and do stay monogamous despite the physical need to unload and relatively easy access to pvssy (either paid directly or indirectly, depending on location and lifestyle) you mean to tell me that women, who don't even orgasm via penetrative sex in +50% cases can't stay monogamous? It doesn't compute.
I don't know anyone who considers virginity by itself as enough reason for LTR. We can all think back to middle school when all girls were virgins and very few if any were pleasant company and on the same frequency as us. So it's obvious it takes much more than the girl's virginity to have a successful LTR.
This is how most women are thoughthat will argue with you over her liberal politics, that blames men for everything, that distrusts men, that thinks she is more intelligent than you etc.
exactly bro. Virgin or not. This is what some guys dont understand. This rebellion vs submission is the central battle between male and female. If they just submit to a WORTHY man, their life will be awesome.This is how most women are though
Sooner or later all of them will be like this . This is their nature
You also have to be or become a guy worthy of female submission , and due to the easiness of credits people can live above their means till they reach their mid or late 30s easilyexactly bro. Virgin or not. This is what some guys dont understand. This rebellion vs submission is the central battle between male and female. If they just submit to a WORTHY man, their life will be awesome.
It is definitely their nature. Some are better than others tho.
Listen. He’s anything but a cuck, quasi cuck or anything else.The guy we're talking about it here gives off the impression of being at least a quasi cuck, if not a full cuck depending on the interpretation of the word cuck.
It's seemingly impossible to positively spin a childless 46 year old man with a woman 7-8 years older who still has one child under 18 living at home.
I wouldn't understand why any desirable childless man would choose a woman with children under 18 still present. A mid 40s childless man is capable of having options with women who are late 30s/early 40s and childless. That's not a big stretch.
It's important to me to be the older one in a relationship. The masculine-feminine dynamics do tend to be off in situations other than that. The same thing happens with women taller than me too. I need to be taller or at a minimum the same height. Women also prefer not to be taller.
I've seen an increase in relationships where the woman is between 6 months-3 years older. While that's not cougar territory, that does throw off the masculine-feminine dynamics. Men have a strong preference to be the older partner. Being with a woman who is even slightly older throws that off a little bit.
The high school or college sweethearts thing can have some appeal. Eventually, even the passion in those relationships dies out. Most relationships have a shelf life of goodness of around 5 years, regardless of how long the relationship actually lasts.
Yes exactly. A man does not want a woman who submits to everyone. She needs standards. I agree. A man should become the best version of himself in order to be worthy of leading a woman.You also have to be or become a guy worthy of female submission , and due to the easiness of credits people can live above their means till they reach their mid or late 30s easily
But we do not want women in their late 30s , we want them when they are young , so you have to rely less on how much money you make and more on how well you live your life
Living and interesting life separates you from the flock of clueless guys
Genesis 3:16 " your desire will be to control your husband, but he will rule over you"@Pandora with all due respect, I don't understand what you are trying to say. Perhaps you can help me with my confusion.
The whole point when a woman is a virgin is that she is supposed to test you and be rebellious. She needs to see if you are worthy of her giving up her most valuable attribute. The lesser she sees you as worthy, the more testing and rebellion you will get.
This is a feature, not a bug. If all women were like this, the marketplace would be correctly distributed again, because the highest SMV guys could not monopolize most of the women. Why? Well, if a woman would have to risk she would be better than the countless other notches that the highest SMV chads conquered, and she would not risk that due to losing guys that are closer to her own SMV.
You are right. This is fundamentally a pick up artist/red pill and plate spinning forum, so perhaps this thread was pointless. I just wanted to provide a different perspective to that philosophy.Hitting nearly 12 pages in a couple days is wild. I feel like this thread has run its course no? @DreamAgain There are so many opinions and arguments being tossed about that it is hard to follow anything...
Wrong. Women are looser than ever. They just test AFTER they have sex with you on the first night. Again, this proves my point. Pure retardation.Sorry, a lot of this is grasping at straws. Women are looser than ever and testing less than ever. They are only b1tchy (or testing because in this context it is equivalent) to nonchads, maybe you fall into that, but if you are an attractive guy it has never been easier to sleep with women.
1) I definitely want her to make sure im not a bullsh1tter, there are many ways she can do this. Actually, it is simple how she would do it. She would simply make you wait until marriage to give it up, so that would prove you reaaaaallly liked her and would be willing to choose her above all else to be with her.
I don't think it was pointless and I enjoyed seeing everyones takes, but at this point I'm at a loss when trying follow lolYou are right. This is fundamentally a pick up artist/red pill and plate spinning forum, so perhaps this thread was pointless. I just wanted to provide a different perspective to that philosophy.
Its not pointless. The point is that age gap relationships are the ones that work. The man in his 30s is mature enough to lead a fertile young female in her early twenties or late teens.I don't think it was pointless and I enjoyed seeing everyones takes, but at this point I'm at a loss when trying follow lol
According to the model listed in the article below, there are 9 paths that men can pursue regarding relationships. I think this model makes sense in terms of defining paths.You are right. This is fundamentally a pick up artist/red pill and plate spinning forum, so perhaps this thread was pointless. I just wanted to provide a different perspective to that philosophy.
Dude, if women are so stupid and idiotic like you say, it is amazing that humanity has even procreated and survived this far, and that men simply haven't completely ignored women and their stupidity and let the species die out.Wrong. Women are looser than ever. They just test AFTER they have sex with you on the first night. Again, this proves my point. Pure retardation.
If women were so good at testing then they would not be having children for deadbeat losers that they complain about 9 months later. They would have tested the man enough not to spread their legs. The truth is that young women are horrible at picking a mate. This is why the FATHER historically meets the suitor.
Lastly, women test in the relationship more than ever. They are constantly pushing back against your guidance within the relationship. The problem is that the man is supposed to set the direction of the relationship because it is the MAN that was blessed with wisdom and foresight. A 19 yr old female has no wisdom and foresight.
I know? i said it wasn't pointless.Its not pointless.
You keep proving my point. We survived this far because women were held in check. Now we are going extinct because we flipped the natural order upside down. We now have a negative birthrate due to allowing feminism and female hypergamy to run wild.Dude, if women are so stupid and idiotic like you say, it is amazing that humanity has even procreated and survived this far, and that men simply haven't completely ignored women and their stupidity and let the species die
I also don't believe a 19 year old female has no wisdom or foresight. A lot of men are dumber than women. On average, women are smarter than men. The extremes are where the differences reside.
Who said anything about being leaders? I have no reason to debate with anyone who keeps propping up straw men.You keep proving my point. We survived this far because women were held in check. Now we are going extinct because we flipped the natural order upside down. We now have a negative birthrate due to allowing feminism and female hypergamy to run wild.
Did you say that on average women are smarter than men??? Lol. Yeh so smart that they own the majority of credit card and student loan debt. So smart that they are taking the majority of antidepressants etc. You must be a female poster disguised as a man.
I never said women are stupid. I said they were not designed to be leaders. They are far happier being leaders of the domestic sphere meaning the household and raising beautiful young children and nesting. They are better than men at that and ONLY that.