How come we don't have BIG muscular chad looking mass shooters?

[Pierce Manhammer]

Texas process:

How to buy a gun

Discover the essential steps on how to buy a gun in Texas. Learn about legal requirements, background checks, and tips for purchasing firearms safely and responsibly. Get informed before your next purchase!

texasgunexperience.com

Because in this discussion references should be provided.

In my state of Texas, a hot bed for gun violence and Maas shootings, it is easier for me to obtain an AR-15 simply by walking in to a store than it is to purchase a pistol(restrictions), operate a car(requires a license, insurance, and renewals), commercial truck(requires a commercial license, money), and Grenade(obvious reasons).

The Uvalde shooter could not legally purchase a pistol due to his age but he could purchase an AR-15 without a license, background check, age restrictions, not Jack shvt!

 

[EyeBRollin]

Texas has very little gun violence

This is a lie.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

And with that I’m out of this circle jerk. Have fun kids, at this point you’re pissing in the wind on both sides of the argument.

 

[DonJuanjr]

This is a lie.

Look at Chicago.

 

[RickTheToad]

This is a silly statement. Out of all the ways to kill a person, gun is the easiest and most efficient, especially at any kind of distance.

Perhaps, but it's the truth. Most efficient is prob. a rocket or cyanide if you want to split hairs. Doubtful most people could get their hands on either so easily.

 

[EyeBRollin]

Perhaps, but it's the truth. Most efficient is prob. a rocket or cyanide if you want to split hairs. Doubtful most people could get their hands on either so easily.

Literally the case for more gun restrictions.

Look at Chicago.

Can’t compare a city to a state.

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

Texas has very little gun violence because we have guns. Keep spreading those lies, boi.

you ridiculous smh

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

It does. Incels with AR-15s require the police and other law abiding civilians to have equal or greater armament.

This! An Incel using a pistol for the first time can easily get outgunned by a more experienced civilian with a concealed carry. An Incel an Ar-15 requires the police or greater to take down, especially if he’s at an advantageous spot.

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

Texas process:

How to buy a gun

Discover the essential steps on how to buy a gun in Texas. Learn about legal requirements, background checks, and tips for purchasing firearms safely and responsibly. Get informed before your next purchase!

texasgunexperience.com

Because in this discussion references should be provided.

how to buy a gun, nothing specific about this post. This is the correct post dude.

What You Need to Know About Purchasing Firearms in Texas

www.flowermoundcriminaldefense.com

 

[Bokanovsky]

Irrelevant. Incels can’t shoot up schools if they don’t have access to these weapons. Without the gun they aren’t even getting past a security guard. These aren’t Chads.

If you ban "assault weapons", incels will move on to other types of guns. A pump action shotgun can do a lot of damage and is not difficult to use. If you ban all guns period, incels will find other ways to kill people. Here in Canada, we had an incel who drove a rented van down a pedestrian sidewalk and killed 11 people.

Guns have been prevalent in society for centuries but mass shootings are a relatively recent phenomenon. Why? Because there were no incels in the old days. The only way to solve the "incel mass murderer" problem is to address the social conditions that turn young men into incels in the first place. But strangely, no one seems to be interested in doing that. And that's because acknowledging that the social engineering experiments of the past 50+ years have been an abject failure and have led to tragic results is politically more difficult than blaming inanimate objects.

 

[DonJuanjr]

Here in Canada, we had an incel who drove a rented van down a pedestrian sidewalk and killed 11 people.

Why aren't you Canadians screaming for assault van bans?

 

[Bible_Belt]

Perhaps, but it's the truth. Most efficient is prob. a rocket or cyanide if you want to split hairs. Doubtful most people could get their hands on either so easily.

Ammonium nitrate fertilizer and diesel fuel is even easier, but thankfully American education is dumbed down enough that no one understands chemistry.

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

If you ban "assault weapons", incels will move on to other types of guns. A pump action shotgun can do a lot of damage and it's not difficult to use. If you ban all guns period, inches will find other ways to kill people. Here in Canada, we had an incel who drove a rented van down a pedestrian sidewalk and killed 11 people.

Guns have been prevalent in society for centuries but mass shootings are a relatively recent phenomenon. Why? Because there were no incels in the old days. The only way to solve the "incel mass murderer" problem is to address the social conditions that turn young men into incels in the first place. But strangely, no one seems to be interested in doing that. And that's because acknowledging that the social engineering experiment of the past 50+ years have been an abject failure and have led to tragic results is politically more difficult than blaming inanimate objects.

Its called preventive measures. An Incel with an AR-15 has been the most destructive out of any person due to the convenience of getting one and the firepower/range advantage it provides.

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

Ammonium nitrate fertilizer and diesel fuel is even easier, but thankfully American education is dumbed down enough that no one understands chemistry.

or I can just go buy an Ar-15

 

[EyeBRollin]

If you ban "assault weapons", incels will move on to other types of guns. A pump action shotgun can do a lot of damage and it's not difficult to use.

It is less efficient at killing than an AR-15. That means less people die at any given event.

If you ban all guns period, inches will find other ways to kill people.

Correct. Less efficient ways to kill.

Here in Canada, we had an incel who drove a rented van down a pedestrian sidewalk and killed 11 people.

Ok? Snowplow example above.

Guns have been prevalent in society for centuries but mass shootings are a relatively recent phenomenon. Why? Because there were no incels in the old days.

Wrong. Guns now are more efficient at killing and civilians have greater access to them.

The only way to solve the "incel mass murderer" problem is to address the social conditions that turn young men into incels in the first place. But strangely, no one seems to be interested in doing that. And that's because acknowledging that the social engineering experiment of the past 50+ years have been an abject failure and have led to tragic results is politically more difficult than blaming inanimate objects.

Not the only way. Mental health and gun restrictions are not mutually exclusive. Both can be applied concurrently.

 

[Bokanovsky]

Its called preventive measures. An Incel with an AR-15 has been the most destructive out of any person due to the convenience of getting one and the firepower/range advantage it provides.

No offence but this is a stupid argument. If it turns out that, statistically speaking, a Honda Civic is the most popular choice with bank robbers for a getaway car, do you think that bank robberies will decrease if that particular automobile is banned?

 

[Billtx49]

If you ban "assault weapons", incels will move on to other types of guns. A pump action shotgun can do a lot of damage and it's not difficult to use. If you ban all guns period, inches will find other ways to kill people. Here in Canada, we had an incel who drove a rented van down a pedestrian sidewalk and killed 11 people.

Guns have been prevalent in society for centuries but mass shootings are a relatively recent phenomenon. Why? Because there were no incels in the old days. The only way to solve the "incel mass murderer" problem is to address the social conditions that turn young men into incels in the first place. But strangely, no one seems to be interested in doing that. And that's because acknowledging that the social engineering experiment of the past 50+ years have been an abject failure and have led to tragic results is politically more difficult than blaming inanimate objects.

Exactly. This thread proves why events like this will continue. Instead of a debate over the 393 million privately owned firearms in the US, these events should inspire a discussion about improving mental health in our society. The primary driver of these types of killing events.

 

[Gamisch]

Are you afraid of being hit by a car or struck by lightning every time you leave the house? The chances of you being killed in a mass shooting are actually lower. Better lock yourself up in that basement. Wouldn't want to risk getting attacked by a rabid squirrel should you venture outside

View attachment 8571

View attachment 8572

The moment it become a daily routine where people plow their truck into crowds, then yeah. Thats the moment you need to make adjustments. A quick google check learns this happens occasionally, let's say every 6 months on average. Compare that with mass shootings.

Its your fellow American getting slayed on a daily , but I as a distance observer seem to feel more for them than you guys over here do.

Also wanna add , it seems easier to get a gun in the US of A than a truck.

It's all ****s and giggles untill it the gun violence literally hits home.

It's amazing you guys are blind for this. In Europe you simply don't have to worry some crazy maniac has a gun. There are guns, but it's a severe crime, a extremely hot potato nobody wants to hold on to it too long.

 

[Jake_Gyllenhaal69]

No offence but this is a stupid argument. If it turns out that, statistically speaking, a Honda Civic is the most popular choice with bank robbers for a getaway car, do you think that bank robberies will decrease if that particular automobile is banned?

bank robberies and mass shootings are two different things

Exactly. This thread proves why events like this will continue. Instead of a debate over the 393 million privately owned firearms in the US, these events should inspire a discussion about improving mental health in our society. The primary driver of these type of killing events.

Then what’s this plan because I haven’t heard anything yet other than just use a grenade lol

 

[EyeBRollin]

No offence but this is a stupid argument. If it turns out that, statistically speaking, a Honda Civic is the most popular choice with bank robbers for a getaway car, do you think that bank robberies will decrease if that particular automobile is banned?

This is an even dumber argument. And statistically speaking, insuring a Honda Civic is more expensive than other comparable compact cars.