HaleyBaron
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
- Messages
- 2,506
- Reaction score
- 2,122
What a stupid article no offense. Blacks commit a large amount of crime and either they're majority ugly or the this article ignores them.
New to the SoSuave forum? Start your journey to becoming a dating rockstar with our essential guide.
This comprehensive resource will give you the tools and strategies you need to overcome obstacles, build confidence, and attract the women you've always wanted.
Don't let another day go by without taking control of your dating life - start now and get ready to experience the success and fulfillment you deserve.
Thanks for visiting, and I look forward to your success!
What a stupid article no offense. Blacks commit a large amount of crime and either they're majority ugly or the this article ignores them.
People who think like you..Protection of your life from what?
RightWhatever you say dude. You have no clue, but whatever you say.
e. Nothing in subsections b., c., and d. of N.J.S.2C:39-5 shall be construed to prevent a person keeping or carrying about the person's place of business, residence, premises, or other land owned or possessed by the person, any firearm, or from carrying the same, in the manner specified in subsection g. of this section, from any place of purchase to the person's residence or place of business, between the person's dwelling and place of business, between one place of business or residence and another when moving, or between the person's dwelling or place of business and place where the firearms are repaired, for the purpose of repair. For the purposes of this section, a place of business shall be deemed to be a fixed location.
No, we care about preventing incels from committing mass murder.The people that are for restricting firearms only care about freedoms that concern them. It's ironic that the ideals they are against are the ones allowing them to keep their freedoms.
Less efficient means is fewer deaths.They'll still commit mass murder. Just by different means....
That is called a slippery slope logical fallacy. That argument could be applied to any law. A society doesn’t function if it isn’t governed by laws.Those potential "fewer deaths" are not justification for allowing a snowball effect of personal freedoms being taken away by a power hungry government, that only cares about it's preservation.
Dude. You still need a CCP license. Call your local police dept., and you will see.
The law is very clear.Dude. You still need a CCP license. Call your local police dept., and you will see.
e. Nothing in subsections b., c., and d. of N.J.S.2C:39-5shall be construed to prevent a person keeping or carrying about the person's place of business, residence, premises, or other land owned or possessed by the person, any firearm,
We have east Europe as border, and they've been through many wars . That's the main reason there are guns in Europe.
You guys say you have to be ready to fight the "" tyranny of the government " because 300 years ago that might have been relevant. Or use the nazi invasion as a argument.
The question is ,how you gonna fight a Apache type of helicopter?
That's the trade off. You
choose a government which represents the core values and believes of his citizens. It's clear as day you guys are the cause for what's going on in the States.
Same with the homelessness problem. Over here you'll get arrested for sleeping outside. Even in the forest you'll need a permit. USA is a 2nd world country at best.
Land of the free my ass
First gun crime in 60 years. 1 death.It does work. (Also the killer was a former soldier, so he had training)