“I Love you” and the razor’s edge

[sazc]

So you reverted back to your basic programming which is manipulation.

R you unable to go beyond ur basic programming unless taught by men ?

Continued attention whoring

I'm bored. Better things to do. Later

 

[Spaz]

This post alone implies that you have tunnel vision and are unable to see things outside the comfort of your own self justifying (erroneous) narrative.

I see guidance and field reports from members, members who are not you, who have taken this type of information and applied it in practical ways and have been successful with women.

On the contrary, I see members, members which include you, who refuse to apply critical thinking to the information obtained here, and the one thing you all have in common is that you don't post anything about REAL LIFE experiences. You stick to the rhetoric, repeating the jargon, refusing to expand your thinking, because it's your safety net. And you are unhappy about your current situation concerning the opposite sex and you validate the belief that it's not you, it's them, with the rhetoric.

Successful members don't need to do this.

All of this is obvious. It's easy to see who's actually gaming and framing, and who's hiding, by reading the posts and seeing the content that exists in the posts and, more importantly, the content that never exists in the posts.

Happy holidays

Let's see, only 3 or maybe 4 people that has posted any evidence, which is Hank hill, Amante, Guru and Spaz.

Of which only Spaz and Guru has consistently posted. And we both received the most negative reviews whilst producing the most results in real life.

Like you said. The irony of it all.

 

[AJ84]

So @AJ84 and @sazc have you found a single shred of item created by any women ?

There's gazillions of created items on planet earth through the ages

thermoelectric power generator

 

[sazc]

Let's see, only 3 or maybe 4 people that has posted any evidence, which is Hank hill, Amante, Guru and Spaz.

Of which only Spaz and Guru has consistently posted. And we both received the most negative reviews whilst producing the most results in real life.

Like you said. The irony of it all.

I wholly agree with you that @guru1000 @HankHill @Amante Silvestre and a few others have successfully integrated this ideology into real life. What's more, they seem content, even pleased, with their female interactions.

You are wholly dellusional if you think you are remotely in their group/league

Wholly dellusional if you think your council on this site will help any man achieve that kind of success

You just don't get it

 

[AJ84]

Gave birth=women

Nurtured with the feminine imperative from the ages 0-5 = women

Unplugging from the feminine imperative and mentored into masculinity from the ages 5-adulthood = men

They went on to be great men.

Those men who were just "nurtured" by women went on to be Incels

The truth must really be frustrating....

Oh you have proof of boys being mentored by only their fathers after age 5 do you? You were around then for the upbringing of each great man? You are a time traveller perhaps? Hahaha you are a funny guy though.

 

[Ranger]

Let's see, only 3 or maybe 4 people that has posted any evidence, which is Hank hill, Amante, Guru and Spaz.

Of which only Spaz and Guru has consistently posted. And we both received the most negative reviews whilst producing the most results in real life.

Like you said. The irony of it all.

When I read posts and thread like this, it unveils the depth of the imperative.
It’s amazing when I read it in the posts by women. The structural articulation of language used is very deceiving.
Doesn’t make me love women any less. I just shift it out of my universe and what’s left is the observable truth. Strange.

 

[Ranger]

thermoelectric power generator

All based on scientific discoveries made by men. This does not mean women aren’t smart. That’s a huge subject. I’m aware of power generation.

 

[AJ84]

This is scientific fact. There are always exceptions. Women move on much better than men. In every facet.

If women move on so much better then where does this widespread concept of the alpha widow fit in?

 

[AJ84]

All based on scientific discoveries made by men. This does not mean women aren’t smart. That’s a huge subject. I’m aware of power generation.

A woman created the concept and another woman actually built it. If men made the discovery why didn’t they go on and create and build it themselves? What stopped them from doing that?

 

[sazc]

If women move on so much better then where does this widespread concept of the alpha widow fit in?

OH that's another poster entirely with a completely different set of beliefs.

One thing you need to understand here @AJ84 , they don't even agree with each other, lol

 

[Ranger]

If women move on so much better then where does this widespread concept of the alpha widow fit in?

That very first pair bond is very powerful. Helen Fischer has done extensive work on it. In a nutshell, her wiring starts reconfiguring to mate with this man undefinately.
In some cases she is forever unable to rewrite with another man.

 

[Spaz]

I wholly agree with you that @guru1000 @HankHill @Amante Silvestre and a few others have successfully integrated this ideology into real life. What's more, they seem content, even pleased, with their female interactions.

You are wholly dellusional if you think you are remotely in their group/league

Wholly dellusional if you think your council on this site will help any man achieve that kind of success

You just don't get it

And here comes the high level manipulation.

Just a couple of days ago you and AJ were both condemning Guru when he went against the feminine imperative.

Today he's a hero and I'm being condemned because I debunked the feminine imperative on love.

I'm proud to be in both your shiet list of @ssholes.

 

[Ranger]

A woman created the concept and another woman actually built it. If men made the discovery why didn’t they go on and create and build it themselves? What stopped them from doing that?

Faraday, Tesla and and a couple of others I can’t remember created the foundation. The world and technology actually went in a different direction.

 

[Ranger]

And here comes the high level manipulation.

Just a couple of days ago you and AJ were both condemning Guru when he went against the feminine imperative.

Today he's a hero and I'm being condemned because I debunked the feminine imperative on love.

I'm proud to be in both your shiet list of @ssholes.

LMAO. Arguing against biology and social structuring is like trying to revive the dead.

 

[Spaz]

When I read posts and thread like this, it unveils the depth of the imperative.
It’s amazing when I read it in the posts by women. The structural articulation of language used is very deceiving.
Doesn’t make me love women any less. I just shift it out of my universe and what’s left is the observable truth. Strange.

The feminine imperatives is at real risk here.

Hence the venomous responses u r seeing.

Rather cute in an amusing way LOLLL!

 

[Ranger]

The feminine imperatives is at real risk here.

Hence the venomous responses u r seeing.

Rather cute in an amusing way LOLLL!

Borders on terror.

 

[guru1000]

@guru1000 I think I follow what you are saying. Recognize the true intent behind the words "she desires me in an extreme manner" and that will empower you to reply in kind.

I fully support what you are saying. In fact, I think that it's the best explanation of this situation that I've ever heard. I urge you to start a thread on this topic as I feel you (and a few others) are best equipped to give real world guidance on the topic.

That said, from what I am understanding, the members find themselves in situations where the female is imposing extreme feelings on them, sometimes even telling them "I love you", and the timing is just not there for the member to reply in kind BUT they recognize that this is a delicate, Make It or break It moment, and need to understand how to reply, affirming but not committing, so as not to break the moment.

Any phrases, responses, guidance, etc you can offer there?

Again, I urge you to start a thread as this response will get buried and it's an important dynamic to cover.

Graz

I don’t believe it’s quite complicated as to introduce a new ideology/way of thinking or thread.

The problem only exists because most interpret/focus on words rather than intent. The issue arises as words themselves are limited in scope and further “corrupted” by social understanding or misuse which ascribe disparate interpretations to a word. Convolute this with our own proclivities/biases and thus our own interpretation of the word. A seemly word salad but great truth in the above.

Goes back to the discussion of truth and lies. What truly distinguishes truth from lie if the intent belies the words? For example, when she says, “I love you,” in most cases, she doesn’t love me in the sense to put my needs before her own, but rather she desires me in an extreme way. So why doesn’t she just say that, Is she lying? Well she’s describing her feelings in the best way she knows how to given her understanding of these words. So when an individual speaks to me, I try to understand the greater motivations and intent rather than the words themselves.

As to how to reply: Any answer that does not compromise her willingness to desire you in such a way serves both you and her ... even if you need to reciprocate, “I love you too.” Though, her “love” means she desires you greatly and your “love” means you want her to feel safe in her feelings to desire you greatly and have no intent to wrong her.

 

[Spaz]

Borders on terror.

LMAO. That's hilarious !

 

[sazc]

And here comes the high level manipulation.

Just a couple of days ago you and AJ were both condemning Guru when he went against the feminine imperative.

Today he's a hero and I'm being condemned because I debunked the feminine imperative on love.

I'm proud to be in both your shiet list of @ssholes.

I actually gravitate wholly toward the way @Amante Silvestre handles his women.

When it comes to @guru1000, yep, there are points of disagreement between us, but it's, again, easy to see where he has blended all points of information into his dating life, and can council well.

@HankHill is a fairly new poster, but also seems to have a solid sense of his frame, and has integrated ideology successfully.

There are other posters as well.

IMO, you, in the other hand, never post about blending the information on this site with real world application, continue to devolve every discussion into some "which gender is better" argument, and you, as opposed to the other posters I mentioned, always lack finesse and maturity when you post

 

[Spaz]

I would like to know what the core argument is on this thread. That one sex's "feeling" of love is more intense? I can't tell what people are arguing about anymore.

They're irked when we claimed that women's ability to love is limited to just survival unless she is taught to love in a deeper sense of the word.

In essence, Feminine love = survival of her and her offspring's.