Oh, God.
But wait! There is more!
BeExcellent tells it exactly like it was for marriage - in 1991, when young men could last make a living. Women will choose men who are younger if they CAN but (while the record will show that the moment I got my stripper ex back with her rich daddy she dumped me for a frat boy, note she STILL needed an older man with money) first they will choose to SURVIVE. Without welfare (or rich daddies), women would be doing anything men wanted. Instead older women have a doom and gloom forecast for men lucky enough to have young beauties as they promote this fairy tale about young, handsome, rich athletes (all because they want men their age to be stuck with them).
Neil, you and I know that older men can date younger women. But most people on the street aren't that savvy. They think they're stuck in their age bracket. Look at all the posts here from guys who don't realize they could be dating younger: "I just turned 30, does that mean I can't date girls in their 20s anymore?". Lol, no it doesn't. Statistically, IIRC women tend to date men about four years older than they are. Not surprising, because they're probably in their social group in some way, but are more mature.
1. I figured this wasn't common knowledge, no need to say it. But granted, there definitely are some social retards on this forum so I guess it's fine you spelled it out for them.
Of course, the advantage to marrying a successful man who is much older is that the wife will stand to inherit his money at a fairly young age.
Yeah, men are raised to "man up". But men aren't all that fond of taking care of children, and some might view it as "women's work".
I wouldn't say men age more slowly, women tend to outlive them. They age better, looks-wise, generally.
I recall that I used to read a lot of complaints here from guys who said that girls didn't care at all about what kind of potential they had. The girls wanted guys who had already made it. So they didn't care that the guy was in law school, they wanted the established lawyer. I haven't seen any of these posts recently though, so maybe there's been some change in opinion.
if she is divorcing a man solely because of money and there's nothing else wrong with him (IE there's a huge difference between being a broke lazy deadbeat who only wants to watch TV while dodging the debt collectors and not being a wall street millionaire) she's probably a gold digger and you dodged a bullet by calling her your ex lol.
She married a loser. She chose poorly. That means she doesn't know how to properly vet for quality or she wasn't concerned about the landscape looking into her future. Maybe she assumed it didn't matter since she expected Daddy's money would always take care of her. That does happen.
Exactly. That means these couples get married as they are working toward their futures and they are ambitious but predominantly in the potential phase of life. So the best women chose men who demonstrate leadership and discipline to pursue a good career. I have millennial employees including some doctors and nurses. This is what these folks have done and most are now in the family phase of life in their 30s. My mother-in-law married a man who then went off the to the Air Force Academy where he went through pilot training and became a fighter pilot. You have to be an exceptional man and qualify to get an appointment to the military academies, and to be a fighter pilot. That is what my son plans to do. He wants to follow in my father-in-law's footsteps. So far he is making the grades and doing what is required to get there. It is not an easy path. But men who are serious about doing something worthwhile with their lives start young and go in a direction of discipline and ambition. These are the men who the best young women most value.
Then why do people keep telling me that money doesn't matter when according to what you're saying, it does.
Now hopefully we are getting somewhere. I would concur that you meet people whom you have proximity to. My sister the college cheerleader? She met her husband in biology class as an underclassman at university. They dated throughout university and married several years after they got out of college. My brother-in-law started out as pre-med and ended up in computer engineering, which added time to his degree. Incidentally my sister supported my brother-in-law financially for a number of years after she graduated while he finished his education. She stuck by him in lean times. Now he is extremely successful and they reap the benefits of helping one another through life. I see the same pattern in many other couples I know personally who married young and have stayed steadfast through the years. Some were high school sweethearts, some were college sweethearts, some knew each other growing up together where the parents were friends, etc.
What I'm saying is that a young man generally doesn't have the trappings of wealth. What a young man has is desire, ambition and discipline to obtain wealth and create wealth. If a man wants a traditional family, then he might prefer that his wife NOT work. He might prefer (as my father did) that his wife stay home and tend to the raising of babies, which is a big job in and of itself. My mother had a JD (law degree) they met in law school. My father insisted that my mom stay home and handle the child rearing. It for him was a matter of pride to be able to support a wife and children in this way. Many traditional families are still this way. In fact in professional circles it is sometimes a status symbol that a man is able to fully support his wife & kids without her working. It typically creates the best outcomes for the children when compared to two working parents or single parents. It allows the children to receive the top priority and attention of the stay at home parent. Additionally it also frees the stay at home parent to support the working spouse in his pursuits, which creates financial efficiency.
Well I think making lots of money will help me. Like over $200k/year. And I really don't care if the guys on this forum tell me just to get prostitutes. I think it's just how the world works.
Because it isn't. If he has to he will do it. If he doesn't, then he shouldn't. It follows the same basic idea of just because a man CAN take **** doesn't mean he will. He's tough but he isn't a pushover.
But that's not what I said. When women hit the wall, they hit it HARD and lose pretty much everything they were. A man? Not so much because most of his self-worth isn't based on looks or who he married or what family he came from. And women only live longer because they live easier. Men go to wars, more likely to be homocide victims, suicide victims, die in a car crash, smoke, do drugs, and we have higher testosterone (which negatively impacts your cardiovascular health) and women produce slightly higher amounts of HGh throughout their life as well (which positively impacts just about everything in your body unless you have cancer).
Yeah I remember the same. Maybe those same people have gotten older and actualized their potential so they got nothing to complain about anymore haha
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
Bah you gotta be kidding me. We've all known this before. Want good character? You may have to sacrifice looks to get it. Want good looks? You may have to sacrifice character to get it. The thing is though, I want BOTH. Why? Well I don't mean to sound vain, but because I AM both. I have both traits/qualities. Why is it that the man always has to be the one to downgrade? If I know how to take care of myself and also WILLINGLY CHOOSE to have good morals despite also having the mental capabilities to destroy others and this world, why should I have to settle for one or the other? Why not both? A woman could settle for both much more easily than a man can. She could have even been a slut prior and just moved to a different state where no one knows her there and put on an act. Yet men are more likely to struggle. You as a woman basically just admitted to the fact that there's no more hot virgin women anymore. Yet I recall a while ago you were preaching to us chastity for 'something extraordinarily special'. So good-looking men must abstain yet good-looking women don't? That's the essence of cuckoldry, which goes against all forms of nature.
Good quote. He basically just said to let it happen and do what you can do rather than try to force stuff to happen in order to reach happiness, which is I guess the most important thing anyway.
If you currently have too many women chasing you, calling you, harassing you, knocking on your door at 2 o'clock in the morning... then I have the simple solution for you.
Just read my free ebook 22 Rules for Massive Success With Women and do the opposite of what I recommend.
This will quickly drive all women away from you.
And you will be able to relax and to live your life in peace and quiet.
