Tenacity
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,926
- Reaction score
- 2,194
I understand about the "legal" reduction of taxes through using various entities, but my question is during a divorce proceeding where the woman was a stay at home wife.....her attorney will argue that her marketplace skills have been destroyed over the 10 years of marriage. Most Judges would throw out the pre-nup in that situation, so were/are your attorneys able to counter this and if so....could you share how or send over some links in relation to their techniques? I would like to know personally because I never understood how they get around this.Its all rolled into an LLC with multiple layers/business. Similar to what Bible Belt talked about. I asked those questions to our financial planners/attorneys. My family spends a lot of money trying to hide money. If you can figure out how to hide it from the GOVT, you can keep it from women as well.
This is one MAJOR thing I agree with Poon King on. I honestly do not see what a man benefits or gains from signing a marriage contract that does not and can not come from outside of the contract.Even when the risk is eliminated.. the question still remains.. WHAT is the point?
I'm not about living in fear. I don't avoid marriage out of fear. I avoid it because I see no logical reason to get married.
Using the various attorneys, entities, structuring, etc., to save on taxes and boost corporate/business profits along with individual income is one thing......but to go through all of that to marry a chick that can leave you at ANY TIME for ANY or NO reason (due to the No Fault Divorce Amendment) makes no sense to me.
The only way I can see it making sense is if you come from a very strong family culture where everybody gets married, and in order to stay in the "family trust" or get the "family benefits" you too have to participate in said legal arrangement.
Other than that, I don't see what the benefits are at all.