your body type is not as important as....

[Kineti[C]harm]

Originally posted by MVPlaya
Do you do "Parliamentary Debate"?

I did Congress and International Extemporaneous in High School, I was top 5 in Cali in the former and top 5 in the Bay in the latter. In college I do Parli, me and my partner kick some ass... do you do Parli? If so, will I see you at the National Championships this year at Cal-State Northridge (NPDA's) on May 10, 04?

I live in scandinavia, not the US =) When it comes to debates/discussions I participate in any subject I have a background for participating.

 

[Befuddled]

well..'iqqi' .... hmmm.... glad to see u've 'seen the light' so to speak. Now image how much time you could have saved if you had'nt put up those reduclious obstacle courses for guys to begin with.

im sure the 'short-n-skinny' community would like to thank you for making it so difficult for them to reach your pedistral in the begining. By the way, what did you realize ?...now that youve lowered your standards to human-level ?

 

[Kineti[C]harm]

There is nothing wrong in being picky and superficial.

 

[MVPlaya]

Originally posted by Kineti[C]harm
There is nothing wrong in being picky and superficial.

Exactly, and ƒuck Dr. Phil.

 

[Befuddled]

Oh... i never said there was anything wrong with superficiality. i personally am not into fat chicks, but thats just me.

But i do tend to pick my women according to the sports they play and the length of their finger nails (sarcasm). there is such a thing as extrems. i think when you go down to the kind of sports a person plays.... there's probably a lot more 'superficial' in you than 'character'.

Not picking on iqqi in particular.... just about every other girl is the same .

Cheers.

 

[Kineti[C]harm]

Well I'm the kind of person that is REALLY into details and stuff so I always notice clothingstyle, brands, how the makeup is put on, how her hair is done etc. This matters some.

 

[MVPlaya]

ƒuck Oprah too

Originally posted by Befuddled
Oh... i never said there was anything wrong with superficiality. i personally am not into fat chicks, but thats just me.

But i do tend to pick my women according to the sports they play and the length of their finger nails (sarcasm). there is such a thing as extrems. i think when you go down to the kind of sports a person plays.... there's probably a lot more 'superficial' in you than 'character'.

Not picking on iqqi in particular.... just about every other girl is the same .

Cheers.

I ain't hatin' on you. What I'm saying is that we're all here to have fun, and please, are you gonna tell me that the 300 pound UG that you stay away from is because you don't like her personality? C'mon. On the sports note, nobody said don't date soeone because of a sport, but simply, sports make women more attractive. Its you conversed our statement. We meant we wan't for example track women because they have nice asses (from doing track), not... we wan't track women because they do track. If they got nice asses it's all good, just that track girls tend to look nice (after you filter out the dikes).

 

[Befuddled]

what about women who play ...volleyball ? swim ? surf ? etc,etc...they have great bodies too . thats what im getting at. we're all here to have FUN...with reasonably attractive people, right ?

it's been my experience that the sensationalism that surrounds football (in particular) seems to have gotten many many women n girls going gaga, JUST CAUSE IT'S FOOTBALL. you ever notice that ? that not only gets in the way of the groopies having fun, but also prevents those of us who are built like football players and are reasonably attractive from having fun either ! lol.

it's just seems like it's an unneccessary/inhibitive requirement to get to the goal....which is almost always ....FUN.

for an analogy.....bear with me on this....
NASA wants to get a man on mars. women who like football players are doing the selection....guess who gets picked ? guess why the mission fails ?

The mission is another word for 'fun'/'love'/whatever....now tell me what was wrong with that selection process ? maybe the mission to the rest of us, fun, is preety clear.... unfortunately the ones doing the selecting dont seem to thnk that way. THAT IS THE PROBLEM. and i applaud iqqi for seeing that....better late than never. u know ?

 

[MVPlaya]

You didn't answer me:

Would you ƒuck a 300 pound woman with great personality and high IL who wants to ƒuck you?



About sports, I don't discriminate against sports, nor do I discriminate against those who don't do any. I like certain bodytypes and how they got them I don't care. Besides, you are talking about a Mission to Mars, I'm talking about a Mission to my Bedroom. The only way you fail is if you don't make it past the screening test... marriages comes later, Holmes.

 

[Befuddled]

300 lbs lady... nope....even if she did play volleyball.

Mission to mars was an analogy trying to communicate the type of screening process you need to get to ur goal. goal = fun. qualification is not football player. kapeesh ? i never said u dont need to be 'attractive' or whatever. i just dont see how, being a 'football player' = fun to women. i cant explain it any simpler than that.

Cheers.

 

[B9]

Originally posted by Kineti[C]harm
Being scandinavian works good... I've noticed that american girls love scandinavian boys, not quite sure why though...

I have no proof of this, but I have a feeling it is because of our dashing good looks and natural charm.

 

[iqqi]

Originally posted by TesuqueRed
I don't think her point was compromising her standards--more that she was a "girl" who had a basic type---probably the same as all her girlfriends had---and now she's more of a woman and finding that what she responds to is something much different and deeper (and mysterious) than before.

thanks tesuque, you know what i am talking about.

Originally posted by 00kevin
this is very rational, but women don't think that way.

this is an immature statement.

Originally posted by 00kevin This is insightfull. you are just writing this message to help yourself justify your actions. I feel sorry for this "short guy" as you call him. he may of been one of the best guys you ever had but the truth is you would never take him seriously. I'll bet he is an AFC over you too. If these guys are so great and what you say is true why are you not still with them?

i would have stayed with both of them. they were the two guys that i had oneitis for this past year. perhaps you don't recall, the short guy was the guy who had just gotten a divorce, so he had too much baggage to get serious so soon, and the skinny guy was the mentalman with the 20 years his senior sugarmama. there were "other circumstances" in the way of our happily ever afters.

and any guy that i let touch me, i take seriously.

you are taking things waaaay out of context. all i said was that i liked bigger buffer boys. its not like i said i think short and skinny guys were lepers, its just that body type wouldn't attract me. and the POINT was that what did attract me was their sensuality (in the context of bodies and body language). comprende? i wasn't compromising my standards, its not like it was that serious (my "type").

Originally posted by 00kevin one more thing iqqi. i know your type so well. hmm.. let me see. what are your stats? 140-150lbs (a little bit of chunk), 5'6" ish. maybe some blonde hair.. yep. tell me if i'm wrong. do you like volleyball and wish you were taller?

is this a joke? well if it isn't, no i do not fit any of those descriptions. not at all.

Originally posted by mvplayaSo what you are telling us is that body type matters until women turn 30?

um...my profile says i am in my early 20's.

and body type still probaly matters. i was just trying to explain to you that if you are sexy (sensual), that transends body type.

Originally posted by mvplayaif these guys were... ahem... "sensual"... would you go for them?

link

 

[drixsa]

its amazing how many people claim to be "DJ's" yet cannot have a respectful or an intelligent conversation with a lady.

when i first saw this post blank i knew that a bunch of dumb a$$es would be responding to it trying to come off as funny yet ending up looking like dushebags.

 

[Julian]

Mission to mars was an analogy trying to communicate the type of screening process you need to get to ur goal.

WORST ANALOGY EVAR!

 

[B9]

Originally posted by drixsa
its amazing how many people claim to be "DJ's" yet cannot have a respectful or an intelligent conversation with a lady.

Indeed....

 

[myfriendblu]

LOL why are you AFC's giving this AW any attention at all? Leave her ridiculous and mind-bendingly dumb and useless posts alone. Who friggen cares who this AW falls for. i sure don't

 

[Bonhomme]

A gal says what's on her mind ...

and ends up getting flamed.

How silly!

Keep posting your thoughts, Iqqi (and others). Sod the haters.

 

[Befuddled]

Originally posted by Julian
WORST ANALOGY EVAR!

way to get the point space man. most relevant post 'evar'.

 

[eroq]

So the point of iqqi's post was that overall senuality was the key factor? Its just that the football types ooze more senuality than the short, skinny guys, so she usually picks the football player. Good thing I'm Scandinavian and built like a rock.

 

[iqqi]

Originally posted by eroq
So the point of iqqi's post was that overall senuality was the key factor? Its just that the football types ooze more senuality than the short, skinny guys,

nope. i find that the bigger studlier guys are more sexual than sensual. the difference being they focus only on sex, not everything else. rocks aren't sensual. they don't move.