No. The observations have to be significant enough in scale to be empirical. The 20 people you know are not representative of the 330 million Americans.
Yet, I have not seen any evidence that young healthy people are dying, or that hospitals across the world are overflowing. So in fact the burden of proof is on you, if you want to play that game.
This is exactly how conspiracy theorists approach data.
Yes it is, and it's silly - I have never believed in a single conspiracy, even the JFK assassination. . It's pretty easy to dismiss conspiracy and the type of arguments I'm making - for instance, when people ask "where is the parts of the plane that hit the pentagon?" - you can refute with photos of the debris that were taken. Or when people say "burning jett fuel cannot melt steel beams" - you can refute by stating it doesn't melt them, it warps them.
So I ask you the same questions as a point of discussion, after all, shouldn't it be easy to dismiss my claims like any other conspiracy nut in the past was? Yet so far, you've avoided answering both questions. Why are people allowed to make claims that young healthy people are dying from Covid, or that countless hospitals are "overflowing" with covid patients, when there's basically zero evidence of either?
There are many topics that are impossible to verify scientifically, because modern science has become so corrupt by dogma, ego, and bias. I used to be like you and only believe in something if it has a seal of approval in the form of a meta-analysis of 20 double-blind controlled studies with massive sample sizes. This is a myopic way of viewing the world and discovering truth.
And please link us to all the public figures that died due to COVID-19 vaccinations.
This would take me considerable time. There is no database of this. The only recent one I can remember is Willie Garson, who died of 5 months after getting the shots from very rapid pancreatic cancer development.
