Would You Marry A Bisexual Woman?

[Latinoman]

Brad may be off the market and doing things that some would consider AFC but he's doing the things that are necessary to keep a "family style" committed relationship viable. If you are in a successful relationship and DJ needs to "adjust" some of his DJ traits to nurture the relationship. This does not mean that he needs to stop being a DJ! And for the record, I divorced that woman because of issues that had nothing to do with her sexuality.

I am a HUGE fan of Brad Pitt. I love all his movies and like his style in his movies (characters are DJs).

But the fact remains he is currently acting AFC (and "acting" on this case means LIVING REAL LIFE!). Here is another fact, those two kids that were adopted by Angelina Jolie (some kind of Holliwood fashion nowadays) were not his family. He made them his family once he adopted them. That on itself is an AFC move.

How many times has RolloTomasi writen about "single mothers" and the men that marry them?

A man should not go to AFC extremes to keep a "family" that is not even his own. A man should not sacrifice his masculinity for ANY woman either.

That's the American "male role model" (puking!).

All men calamities have one of two LEGAL origins: sexuallity or alcohol.

 

[Latinoman]

If I had the opportunity, I wouldn't settle for A bisexual woman.

Instead, I would marry TWO!

(...dare to dream!)

Why would you marry one? Why not just keep her for several years?

That's the point I try to make. Why men feel the need to marry ANY woman.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

If I had the opportunity, I wouldn't settle for A bisexual woman.

Instead, I would marry TWO!

(...dare to dream!)

And in the words of the once popular Ricardo Montoban... "Welcome to Fantasy Island!!!"

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

I am a HUGE fan of Brad Pitt. I love all his movies and like his style in his movies (characters are DJs).

But the fact remains he is currently acting AFC (and "acting" on this case means LIVING REAL LIFE!). Here is another fact, those two kids that were adopted by Angelina Jolie (some kind of Holliwood fashion nowadays) were not his family. He made them his family once he adopted them. That on itself is an AFC move.

How many times has RolloTomasi writen about "single mothers" and the men that marry them?

A man should not go to AFC extremes to keep a "family" that is not even his own. A man should not sacrifice his masculinity for ANY woman either.

That's the American "male role model" (puking!).

All men calamities have one of two LEGAL origins: sexuallity or alcohol.

Is it that you have something against commitment, family, pre-existing family, movie star stereotypes or what?

 

[Fantasy]

Fantasy...so you want to choose the woman that is going to be your partner for the rest of your life and more importantly the mother of your children based on "how hot" she is and on "how great she is in bed"?

Um, No. I could give you a very detail break down of the past six months but my pen would run out of ink. I just wanted to brag about how hot she and great in bed she is. I ask one of my buddies about this and, strangely, his situation parallels mine. I didn't know the girl he just broke up with was hot, great in bed, and bisexual. He even told me how dirty she talked in bed and how she liked to watch girl-girl porn with him just like mine.

I ain't going to lie, she ain't very domesticated but we have a great time together.

6 months isn't such a short time man. It depends on how much time you spend with someone. Some people are together for years but only spend enough time with each other that will only add up to days. It is all about how much you get to know about a person while you are with them and how much time you spend getting to know them.

On the Brad Pitt thing...You guys should give him a break, man. The guy is a married man. As a married man, there are different rules to you deal with to be a great husband and father.

BTW, Francisco, you are being mighty elusive there.

 

[Bonhomme]

I'd marry her and her girlfriend.

Quit bragging, Francisco.

 

[blueguy]

Where are you from? A girl in a 6 month relationship (started back in February) who is possibly about to get married actively arranged to isolate and cheat w/ me, but I didn't do it. I later called her a few times in the evening, and she asked me not to call in the evening because "he's around me a lot, and that doesn't look too good." lol. I dunno man, 6 months isn't very much. And why is she so eager to get married after only 6 months? Does she think you'll break up with her if you wait another year?

 

[wayword]

On the Brad Pitt thing...You guys should give him a break, man. The guy is a married man. As a married man, there are different rules to you deal with to be a great husband and father.

Why should he get a break cuz he went totally AFC and married a 2-timing ho with 2 kids? Just cuz he's a celeb? Sorry, but he is a sad example of how badly American guys are getting tooled these days by American divas...no matter how good their intentions or efforts are.

LOOK, Angelina is basically just using Brad as a cuckolding nanny for 3 kids who aren't even his! :crackup: Now, if THAT'S not AFC 2 the MAX, then I don't know what is!!!

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

BTW, Francisco, you are being mighty elusive there.

Yeah... Your point is????

Let's just say I was much less experienced and was still wearing my Captain Save a Ho cape (i.e., a "nice guy"). I have nothing ill to say about her because she did show me specifically what type of woman she was. I just chose to ignore the warning signs. Again, it had absolutely nothing to do with her sexuality.

 

[decades]

It depends. but don't just examine her sexuality. look at the totality of her behaviors. what I can tell you is that I believe her "bi-sexuality" is more a function of her sexual boundaries. Bisexuality is a belief system. Everyone has the potential to have same sex relations but most do not follow through on this.

I think her sexual boundaries are flimsy. I think that is a danger sign and could be trouble for you down the road. I think people with weak sexual boundaries are more apt to have sex with "anyone" same sex, other sex, friend, foe, stranger, multiple partners, you name it...so examine this woman in every way you can, not just sexually. you may discover some red flags. Marriage based on primarily on sexual compatibility is not going to cut it.

regards

 

[Latinoman]

On the Brad Pitt thing...You guys should give him a break, man. The guy is a married man. As a married man, there are different rules to you deal with to be a great husband and father.

I was a married man for over a decade and a half. I know exactly the rules to be a great husband and father are. And let remind you of one thing: he was already married once too. And he is not 29. He is 42 years old. He should know better. She adopted those kids when she was with another MEN. It should be THEIR and HER responsibility...not his.

To go back to your original point. There are women out there that are great for wife. Others that are great to be mothers. Others that are great to have for several years KNOWING well you would never marry her (e.g. fun women that are great for fun and sex - but are not great for motherhood ). And so on.

The question in here is this...why do you need to marry a woman that cannot be satisfy by a man to the point that she needs to get herself off by another woman?

Do you know how Latino men from countries in the Caribbean (not the ones that were born and raised in the U.S.) view this kind of thing? Some of us (not all) are very masculine in nature. I for one never understood the fascination of men in the U.S. and Western Europe for "bisexual" women. In fact, we (I) like threesomes...but the way we view threesomes is like this: men having sex with BOTH women.

We don't view it like this: two women having sex with each other.

I personally find this a "nick" to masculinity. A man should be able to satisfy his woman 100%. To the point that she has no sexual desire for other woman or man. The only one unsatiable should be the man...to the point that he and only he (thanks to testosterenes) should be able (if he was moraly inclined) to have a "wife" and a "mistress". This is how Men were in our society. We don't have many of those in today's society. Today we have "m"en that needs "outside help".

Think about that from a non-bias point of view.

It comes down to this...who cares about Francisco or your buddy's relationship with bi-sexual woman? At the end...it is YOUR decision. YOU and only YOU pick who would be your wife and who would carry your last name. You know? The same name that your dad, grand dad, great grand dad, and your children will be carrying. Is she worth of such honor?

 

[Latinoman]

Is it that you have something against commitment, family, pre-existing family, movie star stereotypes or what?

Nope. The more AFCs out there...the more of a "unique" man I become. A Prize. So, technically I have nothing against all of those things one way or the other.

I'm here simply to share some opinions. It is hard to get people out of the Matrix. And quite honestly, that's not my intention either. I simply spread the seed...if it comes up and flourishes, then fine. If it dies...fine too.

 

[Vulpine]

I simply spread the seed...

That's cool, just don't get any of your seed on me.

 

[wayword]

Do you know how Latino men from countries in the Caribbean (not the ones that were born and raised in the U.S.) view this kind of thing? Some of us (not all) are very masculine in nature. I for one never understood the fascination of men in the U.S. and Western Europe for "bisexual" women. In fact, we (I) like threesomes...but the way we view threesomes is like this: men having sex with BOTH women.

We don't view it like this: two women having sex with each other.

I personally find this a "nick" to masculinity. A man should be able to satisfy his woman 100%.

Well, think about it - the Matriarx here has made sexual matriarchy "cool."

It's cool to date MILFs (CUCKOLD).
It's cool to date bisexual women (a man is no longer good enough).
Lesbians are cool (men obsoleted here).

Basically, matriarchs have got men so brainwashed here that we are now actively cheering on our own sexual disempowerment and obsolescence! :crackup:

 

[squirrels]

Depends on her other qualities. If she's the "make out with strange women at the club" type of bi, then no. But if she's a committed mate with wifey-motherly qualities who just happens to have a lesbo-streak, then you could probably work it. Just don't kid yourself.

I know a couple of people who have "open" marriages and still have a strong relationship. But it's a rare breed...so like I said, don't kid yourself into believing something. Pay extra close attention to the red flags.

 

[Latinoman]

I know a couple of people who have "open" marriages and still have a strong relationship.

"Open marriage"?

If you are married...sex with a person other than your partner is adultery.

Now...I'm not saying that I agree or disagree with it. I am just saying how it is view by the church (assuming you are married by the church).

 

[squirrels]

"Open marriage"?

If you are married...sex with a person other than your partner is adultery.

Now...I'm not saying that I agree or disagree with it. I am just saying how it is view by the church (assuming you are married by the church).

If he was religious, he wouldn't be asking about marrying a bisexual girl in the first place.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

I was a married man for over a decade and a half. I know exactly the rules to be a great husband and father are. And let remind you of one thing: he was already married once too. And he is not 29. He is 42 years old. He should know better. She adopted those kids when she was with another MEN. It should be THEIR and HER responsibility...not his...

Sounds like you have a bit of bitter personal history still scurrying around.

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

If he was religious, he wouldn't be asking about marrying a bisexual girl in the first place.

Hey, hey, hey, hey.... No supplying of kindling for a flame war!!! :woo:

 

[Francisco d'Anconia]

Nope. The more AFCs out there...the more of a "unique" man I become. A Prize. So, technically I have nothing against all of those things one way or the other.

I'm here simply to share some opinions. It is hard to get people out of the Matrix. And quite honestly, that's not my intention either. I simply spread the seed...if it comes up and flourishes, then fine. If it dies...fine too.