If anything, that post dealt with -economics- and not politics. Can we not add some feature that prevents posters from posting in certain threads if they deviate from the topic at hand???
How often does someone post on particular subject, only to take the whole thread down a new road.
That on Jvesti posted on "men having a choice" spun off 2 or more additional threads on men, their rights, women, their feelings, and something about a new girl who joined the site and wanted some exposure. What gives.
I ask because I was going to reply. I do understand political flaming gets out of hand...where's free speech?
It's a plain, little known fact that the printing of money, inflation, indebtedness and basic system is floundering. Nobody knows it because economics tries to teach the average college graduate that it's a simple balancing of wants vs. needs. That's such bullsh!t nobody realizes. Economics does not account for emotion, first mistake.
Economics aside, the ability to limitlessly print money was devised so we could go to war without disrupting the budget. When we were on a gold standard, even Alan Greenspan remarked on how foolish and dumb and idea of a limitless money supply would be.
Too few people are uninformed, and generally, when a post, or even a public article raises people's 'hot button', it must be silenced, for the public cannot be out of order!! From disorder, will order be created. If such info is squashed, and basic schools do not spread it, how can anyone else know and change??
It's the fact that people don't know this, don't claim to know it, ignore it, or it doesn't get put in the public's face that we continue to spead the rumors and lies.
A-Unit
How often does someone post on particular subject, only to take the whole thread down a new road.
That on Jvesti posted on "men having a choice" spun off 2 or more additional threads on men, their rights, women, their feelings, and something about a new girl who joined the site and wanted some exposure. What gives.
I ask because I was going to reply. I do understand political flaming gets out of hand...where's free speech?
It's a plain, little known fact that the printing of money, inflation, indebtedness and basic system is floundering. Nobody knows it because economics tries to teach the average college graduate that it's a simple balancing of wants vs. needs. That's such bullsh!t nobody realizes. Economics does not account for emotion, first mistake.
Economics aside, the ability to limitlessly print money was devised so we could go to war without disrupting the budget. When we were on a gold standard, even Alan Greenspan remarked on how foolish and dumb and idea of a limitless money supply would be.
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. - Alan Greenspan
FROM THE US TREASURY WEBSITE: "Federal Reserve notes are not redeemable in gold, silver or any other commodity, and receive no backing by anything. The notes have no value for themselves, but for what they will buy.
----------------------------EXCERPT FROM THE US CONSTITUTION, Article I, section 10: No State shall ... coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts....
Too few people are uninformed, and generally, when a post, or even a public article raises people's 'hot button', it must be silenced, for the public cannot be out of order!! From disorder, will order be created. If such info is squashed, and basic schools do not spread it, how can anyone else know and change??
Without paper money, NONE of the financing for wars would be possible. NONE of the money to be thrown into spending for which few tax payers sign off on or know of could be had. This isn't political-specific. But money is politics. You can't dodge the issue. We're not talking parties that do this, because all parties use the collective credit card to finance their own agenda.But with unlimited dollar conversion into gold, the ability to issue dollar claims would be severely limited. Obviously if you cannot finance federal deficits, you cannot create them. Either taxes would then have to be raised or expenditures lowered.
Any country that abandons its hard precious metal standards (gold and silver) as the United States did in 1934 and 1973, respectively, and operates on funny money cannot sustain either a free economy or a free country.
Even when the sneaky bill that created the Fed and eradicated the gold standard snuck through, President Lyndon Johnson realized the error of his ways remarking he "had ruined his country."And if it is true that in 1967, then-president Lyndon B. Johnson emptied Fort Knox of our gold reserves, then all that needs to happen is for the European Union and its bankers to return to a gold standard and America will be left with a mint full of funny money equal to conch shells on the world trade market.
It's the fact that people don't know this, don't claim to know it, ignore it, or it doesn't get put in the public's face that we continue to spead the rumors and lies.
A-Unit