Sure, so basically the red pill is flawed because it simply idealizes a lot of things that are false about human nature. Work ethic and ambition are almost genetic traits, of course they can be improved up to a certain point, but this notion that you can flip a switch and become an extremely successful, handsome witty guy from whatever baseline you are starting from is simply not true.
The RP template:
To become a top-shelf man, you gotta do whatever women supposedly want you to do, even though many women have abysmal taste. That is, you’re only a top-shelf man if women approve of you, not whether you are actually a good man (no, I don’t mean Mr. Nice Guy).
You don’t need to do or be all of these, but they are RP approved. Not all are inherently wrong or bad, but are all done to meet the ever changing whims of women, which change every five to ten years.
1. Start your own business and earn a minimum income of $200,000.
2. Go to the gym (the new “take a shower” and “clean your room”).
3. Hold frame.
4. Get tattoos.
5. Be a criminal or scumbag.
6. Act like a woman.
7. Constantly “improve” oneself. How, nobody knows.
8. Be a clown, MC, or comedian out of work hours.
That's why there is so much content in which people are in roundtable discussions or on the street asking what women want. Pathetic!
Whatcha gotta do is improve yourself so much that you out-alpha some of the most desirable alpha men on earth: Tom Brady, Vladimir Putin, Ben Affleck, Will Smith, Brad Pitt, Jeff Bezos, Kevin Costner, and some others I can't remember, all of whom were left or publicly punked by their women. According to RP'ers that's because despite their power, fame, and money, they didn't know how to hold frame. (Blame the men, blame the men.) Or, let me guess, they were "making up for their lack of personality with those attributes.
What I consider both pathetic and hysterical is that the female race (and yes, they are like a race unto their own, as Mencken and Schopenhauer spoke of them) has the male race on edge in sexual hunger games, with its members trying to out-alpha one another to get to the top of the heap. That's why we see men turning on each other.
"Most men are losers."
"Most men are pathetic."
"Heehee, the barrier is so low now, man. Most men are so lazy that you're gonna succeed by doing the bare minimum."
"These guys have wage jobs."
According to RP'ers, men who attend work are inferior and are "just over broke," as if there are no jobs that lead to wealth accrual. Last I checked, my friends, family members, and I are not broke, with some being high earning.
One guy on here declared our enemies are our fellow men. So the female race has managed to get men to hold contempt for one another. This is fascinating and comical. Even much of the RP content is intended to indue envy and resentment and feelings of inferiority in the listeners. That's why Andrew Tate bellows into cameras telling men how low he thinks of men.
I remember Stirling Cooper in a clip saying that being an employee is bad because he as an entrepreneur in the past would be worried about how he would make pay roll, as if all employees are working for some scrapping hustler. I suppose the didn't realize that's not a good pitch for entrepreneurship either.
Also, the archetypes of Chad and Tyrone and idolization of "top shelf" men has gotten pathetic and homoerotic. As I said, the article by Rollow, "Men Who F-ck," if one were to read it without knowing who its author was, might think it was romance fiction written by a woman. Some posts on here read like that too. "Heehee bro, I was in da club in Miami, poppin' bottles, just cold chillin' with da fellas. This one handsome fella, he was swimmin' in hoes. Tall, dark, shredded, connected, he slays hoes on the daily. My boy told me he's worth 50 million. He walks in da club and all eyes are on him. All the guys want to be like him."
This is unsustainable.
Inb4: "This sounds like an inkwell rant."
