Who will win Super Bowl XL?

Who will win Super Bowl XL

  • Pittsburgh Steelers

    Votes: 20 60.6%
  • Seattle Seahawks

    Votes: 13 39.4%

  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
869
Reaction score
2
Location
***** palace
Seattle Seahawks... AHHAA LOST cuz steelers deserver to win, don't make it the refs fault all the plays were fair called if u don't like it too bad. The reason why seahawks lost is terrible coaching in the end of 2nd quater and the last play. They could have kicked it and made a field goal then kick a 10 yard one to get the ball back if they were lucky but they didn't. Alexander did pretty well but he still got shut down he had no key play in the game. BUS OWNS OMG HE should have been MVP too bad he's gonna retire he was unstoppable today. GJ PITS! :cheer:
 

reyalp

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
598
Reaction score
1
Location
southern usa
I was pretty impartial, but Peternorthisagaypornstar, you seem to be gloating a bit much over such a close game. Maybe you should stem that back a little bit.
 

oakraiderz2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 26, 2002
Messages
4,626
Reaction score
28
Age
38
Location
Colorado
This is hard for me to say but....F*CK THE STEELERS! Wow, i feel better.
 

PRMoon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2003
Messages
3,739
Reaction score
41
Age
44
Location
-777-Vegas-777-
I think we should all be reminded the gamblers creedo.

"On any given sunday ANY football team can defeat another, there are no absolutes"

Bad officiating, bad play calls, injuries, hell even a single play can determine the winner of a fooball game. That's the nature of the 10 yard fight. The amont of factors that go into any sport really that determine the outcome are why we have placed odds on the game and gambling exist at all.

That being said I can't wait for the 06'-07' season to start. I love this game.
 

seanchai

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
766
Reaction score
5
Age
39
Location
Seattle
Refs were TERRIBLE. That said, these Seahawks played like last year's Seahawks. Not a good game.
 

Bonhomme

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
3,957
Reaction score
16
Location
Land of the Ruins
Yeah, there were a few calls that were questionable, at best -- I think that first offensive pass interference that erased a Seahawks TD was the worst of 'em -- BUT, above all, the Hawks just plain fvcked up, and were seriously out-coached by the Steelers.

Running 2 plays in a row when they needed 20 yards to get the 1st down? Letting the clock run out at the end of the BOTH halves? Sheeit, there was enough just in those things to cost them the game!

The Steelers, on the other hand, made a few brilliant moves that won them the game. The reverse-pass, excellent! And Roethlisberger's canny running kept several drives going, however badly the passing game was flopping.

The game in a few words: the Hawks handed it to the Steelers, and the Steelers TOOK it.

Congrats, Steelers!
 

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Re:

Sorry, but some 'conspiracy' was afoot to hand this over to the Steelers...

http://www.superbowl.com/gamecenter/recap/NFL_20060205_SEA@PIT

Go there to see the stats that SEA had won.

SEA
*Won the turnover battle.
*Won the time of possession battle.
*Won the yardage battle.
*Drove down the field better with vanilla plays.

Calls in question...
*If the camera angle on Roth's run-in wasn't conclusive, how did the ref see it 15 yards away in fast mode?

*You're telling me a little shoving isn't allowed on Darrell Jackson? Did you see Ike Taylor shove around Darrell? Where do the refs draw the line at offensive pass interference and just game play?

*Jeramy Stevens SHOULD NOT talk any ish, since he can't back it, and he never has. Porter was right to speak up, but Stevens can't back it. I knew he'd get popped all game.

I'm sure PIT fans are happy to have a Superbowl, but the nation would rather have had the PATS. At least it would have been competitive AND entertaining. Watching the 1st half, SEA owned the game. ROTH couldn't move it. And he wouldn't have, were it not for the refs and some poor calls.

Nice half time show, where'd they dig up the dead 'Stones?' Do you think any of the girls in the crowd knew who they were?

TERRIBLE Ads, too. Were there any good ones?

Wait, wait, wait...Parents grumbled about the whole Timberlake/Jackson debacle, that lasted 5 microseconds...but LOADS of sexual commercials, violence, and improper innuendos, PAID millions for and no one barks? So the idea of a COVERED boob is bad, but the suggestions of loads of sexual commercials, violence, and improprieties, does NOTHING?

Since MTV's been kicked from half time preparation, it's been bad. The most delightful part of my night was spending it with family and 50 other people watching it on my uncle's new 61" HDTV and surround system, with endless beer, SOCO punch, food, and laughs. Otherwise, I'm glad I didn't go, nor spend the dough on the shirts.



A-Unit
 

doctoroxygen

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
581
Reaction score
4
On point with those stats, A-Unit. The PI on D-Jack was called AFTER Chris Hope whined to the ref behind him. The Roethlisberger TD was called too quickly and concretely to be a legit decision. And a personal foul on a "below the belt" tackle? Come on.

Nobody knows the Seahawks, the game was already going to be lower rated, and Jerome Bettis is from Detroit (hadn't you heard?). In other words, there's no way the NFL was going to allow a Seattle team to win. A sickening end to a terribly officiated playoffs.
 

Supreme1

Don Juan
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Age
39
Location
Quincy
super bowl

Yeah, didnt really seem like a usual super bowl. Not that exciting.
Was boring as hell till the 2nd half things started pickin up. There were all steelers fans there! Looked like a steelers home game.

But i felt like i was watchin a preseason game instead of the super bowl.

Haha the Rolling Stones looked old as hell...
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
869
Reaction score
2
Location
***** palace
Originally posted by reyalp
I was pretty impartial, but Peternorthisagaypornstar, you seem to be gloating a bit much over such a close game. Maybe you should stem that back a little bit.
HAh close game my a*s, seahawks were down 2 whole touch downs that's not close. Cmon it's the steelers who beat the colts and luck was on their side. It was a bad game after all, half time show sucked since sound quality was horrible and the dancing was just plain homosexual... the commericals dissapointed me only few were funny... some were just retarded like the hummer and pepsi commercials. Guess they ran out of filming money when they bought the slot.
 

Bonhomme

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2002
Messages
3,957
Reaction score
16
Location
Land of the Ruins
Only good commercials were the hospital one where they killed the bug and the Grizzly Man parody.
 

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Re:

Guess what?

Guys, Pats are going for a 3peat. I will NOT recognize the Superbowl 40 debacle.

11 points?

Come on, they missed 2 field goals. And HOW many td's were called back for artificial calls, completed concocted with conspiracy in mind? Any other game, FINE. But even BIG BEN, admitted "I never got in. I went to the sidelines and told coach 'I don't think I go in.' But we would have gotten in on the next drive." Well that score is not assured, so who knows?

Parcells admitted it was terrible.
Madden did the same.

It's UNDENIABLE.

Years ago, the tuck rule would have lead me to believe the Pats were destined to win 2001 Superbowl. BUT, this is truly eye for an eye. What, did the refs feel bad during the Colts game that if Polamalu's hadn't worked out the way it did and the Steelers didn't make it, the refs would be slaughtered for a poor call??

A-unit
 

Survivor

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 11, 2000
Messages
763
Reaction score
25
Age
48
Willie Parker's run was the ref's fault?

All of the punter's punts went for touchbacks. Was that the ref's fault?

Two missed field goals. Was that the ref's fault?

Randle El's pass was the ref's fault?

Ike Taylor's INT was the ref's fault?

Is is the ref's fault that both Holmgren and Hasselbeck forgot what 2 minute drill was?

Motormouth Jeremy Stevens chokes on a fat one and drops 3 of 4. I guess that was the ref's fault too, right?

Yes, the officiating sucked. Granted, Rothlisburger did NOT score that TD, but good teams can win despite poor officiating. Steelers did just that against Indy.

This will just have to be a lesson to coaches everywhere that part of game preparation is finding out beforehand which referees are officiating your game, what their historical tendancies are for making various calls, and adjusting the game plan accordingly.

Good coaches HAVE to game plan for both the opponent AND the officials.

Congratulations Steelers. Now if only my Cowboys can find a good kicker.....
 

Men frequently err by talking too much. They often monopolize conversations, droning on and on about topics that bore women to tears. They think they're impressing the women when, in reality, they're depressing the women.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

reyalp

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
598
Reaction score
1
Location
southern usa
Originally posted by PeterNorthisawesome
HAh close game my a*s, seahawks were down 2 whole touch downs that's not close. Cmon it's the steelers who beat the colts and luck was on their side. It was a bad game after all, half time show sucked since sound quality was horrible and the dancing was just plain homosexual... the commericals dissapointed me only few were funny... some were just retarded like the hummer and pepsi commercials. Guess they ran out of filming money when they bought the slot.
You have a lot to learn, kid.
 

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Re:

Everything you posted, Survivor, was ALL the Steelers did, and not ONE call went against the Steelers in some dramatically material way. Not one. There wasn't a call back of a TD. There wasn't a questionable fumble, or a questionable INT. Nothing.

From the get-go, this was the Steelers bowl, no matter what. YES, good game-planning holds up; that's what got them this far. But that's where the buck stops. It was "Bettis' home coming", a Pittsburgh Superbowl if you observed the fans, and Cowher was offer this one on a silver platter since he was owed it from the previous on botched calls AGAINST him.

Pitt got schooled in all important categories, yet came out on top. Also, SEA was the LEAST penalized team in the league. UNTIL they meet PITT, who is one of the more penalized teams in the league, and they walk away with 7 penalties for 70 yards. WTF? Most of the calls were questionable at BEST, yet their outcome on the game was HUGE.

Sure, they pissed 2 field goals. But give props to a guy who KILLED it more than 60 yards, but was off only a few yards. Having to make 50 yards time after time is an irregularity in the NFL. Only Neil Rackers of recent memory had that consistency as of late, and he'd only made 1 per game, because that was the only way AZ could score.

It's a travesty to American sports for that to occur. Ben got schooled by SEA his completion % and false touchdown, horrible. Yards per carry was the only bright spot offensively for PITT, and that's because Parker's 75 yard run BOOSTED the stats. Other than that, Bettis managed his pedestrian 3 yards/carry, while Shaun squeaked out 5.5.

SEA was doing great, with just vanilla work in the 1st half. Without any gadget or trick plays SEA had the game managed properly. It was only at the 2minute rundown they had complications. And by the time it was 2minute rundown in the 2ndhalf, the game was out of reach. It was out of reach at the 6 minute mark in the 4th.

PITT can gloat all they want, but I'm proud to say NE owns 3 of the last 5 now, and will consider NEXT year to be a 3 peat if they do it, because of this terrible display.

How fitting would it be to have NE vs DAL, Belichick vs Parcells, Brady vs Bledsoe?

That would be a Superbowl worthy of watching, and ANY team making history is better to watch than trash tv of this past one.

Mark it down, PITT won't come close to the Superbowl next year, REGARDLESS of what they do. If they lose Whisenhun, Bettis, Randle El, and a defensive player, they don't have it in the bag. I like Big Ben, but he coasted most of the Reg. Season on the rushing attack and solid D. Randle El is a free agent, and he'll likely want big money now that he's won a superbowl. PITT had a hard enough time signing Ward, who's been a consistent #1. It's doubtful Randle El stays now.

Nor do I think Indy makes it, since they're not going to sign Edgerrin James, which is totally foolish since it was Indy's D + James that got them to 13 wins without much throwing of Peyton. It isn't like they have a dual threat of backs over there, and James is the perfect back; he catches AND runs, and is consistently one of the top 5 in the league. And for that reason, they never made it to the next stage because they abandoned the run vs Pitt and mismanaged game control.

SD had a chance, but that went out the window when Brees went down. NOW they can't trade Rivers and recoup their lost investment, since who knows if Brees will be ready (his injury is similar to Penningtons, and he can't throw worth a damn). Trading Rivers for picks would have put them over the edge, since they have a force on Offense and a great young D.

No Next Year will be the year of Den, Ne, Mia, Dal, and possibly KC. Indy and Pitt will compete, but they'll fall from where they are now. Buf will be terrible unless they get some WR and OL help. NYJ is done. And Oak is busted without a NEW QB, stick a fork in Collins. Forget Green Bay, they're too far off. Bal is unsettled.


A-Unit
 

Survivor

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 11, 2000
Messages
763
Reaction score
25
Age
48
Re: Re:

Originally posted by A-Unit
Guys, Pats are going for a 3peat. I will NOT recognize the Superbowl 40 debacle.
NFL Rule 3, Section 21, Article 2, Note 3
If the player loses possession of the ball while attempting to recock his arm, it is a fumble.
I guess I don't have to recognize the 02 AFC Championship debacle either...
:D
 

A-Unit

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
1,515
Reaction score
43
Re:

You can recognize whatever pleases you.

However, clarification should be mad for those that didn't watch it, who have preconceived notions about it, or are decidedly against it.

It was ruled 'tuck' because it appeared to be an incompletion / tuck fumble, based on what Brady was doing. I will admit, it's a weird rule, but then again, rules govern the grey area so people aren't forced to make a decision under intense pressure that could be miscued.

Normally a forward motion of the hand is identified with an incompletion, so it seems fitting to call it a tuck rule. Isn't that refs are always watching for when a QB goes to throw? Was his hand in forward progress as being hit or not?


A-Unit
 

PRMoon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2003
Messages
3,739
Reaction score
41
Age
44
Location
-777-Vegas-777-
Here's a little fuel for the fire.

"The game was properly officiated, including, as in most NFL games, some tight plays that produced disagreement about the calls made by the officials," NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said in a statement.

Full article here

Honestly I could care less about the officiating or which one of these teams won. I only bet on regular season NFL games and college games so I don't have a "favorite" team anymore, just teams i like to bet on.

However as a gambler I can say I see questionable/missed calls have cost me a fortune. You just gotta learn to shrug it off and realise sometimes the ball bounces in your favor and other times it smacks you in the face.
 
Top