Tazman says,
Since you stated you do believe men and women ARE different, in what ways are we different in your opinion?
When I stated that it was more based upon present-day positions and power. Men have more wealth and more power than women do today as a collective whole. Men also have more historical contributions and successes. Men also have more physical power than women as a collective whole.
Tazman says,
Also, is this not a male oriented site? Why would the men who come here need to focus on the good things about women when that's the original attitude that brought them here to begin with?
In my opinion, if a guy came here as a result of having problems with women, it's NOT because he thought women were good that he was having problems, but instead it's because he didn't know how to turn women on.
There's no extremes, you don't have to be a jerk to turn women on while on the flipside, you don't have to be a nice guy to turn them on either. You can remain loving and continue to cherish women WHILE holding onto the natural things that turn them on and continue to have success. Matter of fact I would argue, it's NOT the jerks or tough guys that get MOST of the girls, the guys that get MOST of the girls are those that have found a way to remain loving or "nice" while at the same time creating intense ATTRACTION in the woman.
I am also firmly against the "rich debate" around here, with guys saying the guys that get all the women are the rich guys. Less than 5% of the entire POPULATION in the country makes over $100,000 a year and the birth rates are not decreasing. In other words, there's just NOT enough rich guys to go around to **** all the women. So that argument doesn't make sense either. Furthermore, IF a woman is with you because of the strength of your financial balance sheets, if you go broke does she then leave? Did she ever like YOU AS A PERSON anyway?
Again, just my opinion lol, I'm not trying to indoctrine anybody nor promoting myself as a category authority on this subject. I only speak from my own experiences.
Tazman says,
Some of the men who are in this discussion are in good relationships with women they care about and trust, which from what you stated would make them hypocrites, right? Atleast the ones who disagree with you.
Tazman this is the basis of my agrument. If you look around at the stances of alot of the guys here it's always something EXTREME like:
"American women are low quality."
"You can't trust American women."
"Women are all slvts."
"Women are not marriage material."
It goes on and on.
Here's the obvious question, have these guys had experiences with the over 200 million women in this country? I understand the concept of a representative sample from scientific method related experiments, but how can you randomly sample and MAKE ACCURATE CONCLUSIONS about something so BROAD as social dynamics?
Think about that. Can you REALLY put this into a box?
Different women like different guys. This group of women might not like this group of guys.
These groups of women might be more better suited for relationships, this group might not.
How can you group the entire gender into a few groups, when the gender is SO BROADLY spread out amongst different cultures, tastes, values, morals, backgrounds, and influences?
I don't know how many black guys are on this forum, but as a black guy I will be the FIRST to tell you, 90% of the "tips" in the Don Juan Bible will NOT work on a black woman lol.