Strange post, with some valid and not so valid points
Iqqi has some good points, but she stereotypes across the board. "You" don't do this, "you" don't appreciate that, etc. Just who is "you" anyway?
Case sample, myself. Let's see, I've dated bimbo blondes, highly educated smart blondes, interesting brunettes, mean brunettes, chunky women, toothpicks, and a nice collection of mixes (half black/half Spanish; half French/half West Indies; half Persian/half White), and some sistas.
All of them are INCREDIBLY different in the way they look, think, believe, act, love, etc. And I would think most men have my similar background of dating, a lot of variety without one being totally like the other, unless there's a certain type of woman you always zero in on, and even then they're still going to be different because they're human.
Uh yeah, I like a Playboy picture as much as the next guy. It's called sexuality and enjoying the opposite sex. Plus, it's not as smutty as some mags and I don't feel dirty after looking at it. That doesn't mean I'm going to date women who look like those in the magazines (though I wouldn't mind it!), just like dumb women who go see geeks in nerdy Chippendale's outfits. Looking doesn't mean dating, and so forth.
Iqqi's post did re-affirm my beliefs in how shallow so many women are. They have a stereotype of ALL men and then naturally gravitate towards the worst in the dating scene, then procede to go back to bashing all men. It's a vicious cycle that never ends -- thus the plethora of women's magazines on the market.
For the record, most men I know do appreciate the sights, smells, touch, walk, smile, wink, hair toss, humor, personality, smarts, etc., of women.
The difference is DJ's don't put up with sh-t or believe one ounce of those stereotypes that "WE" are supposedly fitting into.