The Homo Movement in America Is Out of Control, Rex Got Flashed

[Jaylan]

I live in upstate NY, one of the highest taxed yet poorest areas of the country.

Nobody said anything about being comfortable. They work hard and have a meager living but they get by.

And if they couldn't, then they shouldn't be having any kids.

I live in the Hudson Valley myself, and I will agree that some areas around here, and especially further up near Rochester and Buffalo, can be poor as hell, yet taxed a lot. I agree people shouldnt be having kids if they cant afford it, but life happens. No one wants to struggle and live meagerly, which is why I advocate a two family household, and want a wife who works full time. Id be ok if she worked part time....but shed have to be bringing in decent change to help in the house.

I'm not defending them, I am just saying they are different because they also bring demand with them, not just labor.

Working women increase demand as well. Consumer sales went through the roof once women had their own cash. They definitely stimulate the economy. Women buy most things for the house anyways...and def do more shopping now that they dont always have to ask hubby for cash.

The graphs show that immigration was tiny compared to women entering the workforce. Most of the labor gain was due to feminism.

Those immigration numbers are annual. That means in the 50's, where there were 2,000,000 immigrants, they were less than 2% of the population (AT BEST), wherease women joining the workforce at a rate of 10% means they were nearly triple that number at least.

Are we viewing the same graphs? In both graphs I see a HUGE spike in immigration and workforce women around 1970 to 2000. How are you missing that? They greatly coincide with one another as well. One could gather that the spike in female employment was helped by immigration spikes...it makes perfect sense.

They didn't have to be able to do every single job men did, they just had to come in and take jobs that were previously taken by men. Labor supply doubled over the course of 30 years due to women. Immigrants totaled 12 million during that time frame. Less than 10% of the population and that's assuming they all joined the workforce.

See, you are arguing about labor supply, but you are forgetting workforce demand. As technology improved and moved away from manufacturing into information and economic based jobs (basically desk work), demand increased for workers.

If half of all women stopped working right now, sure some wages would go up, but it would cripple a lot of families. Not everyone will get super high wages thats enough to raise a family, and companies would have less productivity due to less workers....they would make less money...which means the economy would slow down. If anything, feminism (allowing women to leave the home) and technology helped grow the economy

Admit it, women added far more to the workforce than immigrants did during the growth of feminism. I know you are going to fight it tooth and nail, but that's why you are always the one who ends up attacking character, getting pissed off and calling me a racist because of it.

The problem is you have no hard evidence backing up this position. Your graphs present an "either-or" possibility. One could definitely gather from those graphs that many of the women in the workforce were immigrants. And its true...as my best friends grandmother moved to this country years ago and immediately began working. Many women did...his grandmother worked with many women like herself.

And the only times ive implied that your positions appear to be racist or sexist, is when you say things that are clearly derogatory or offensive. This isnt one of those times though.

Sooooo, you are going to again avoid my question on why corporations are not allowed to lower their costs but you and I as consumers ARE allowed to?

Did I say they werent allowed? No I did not. I said globalization has made the world a greedy "Dollar first, people second" place. And I think governments need to put forth measures to ensure that domestic populations arent taken advantage of. America does a crap job of that in my view.

What is wrong with building plants in other parts of the world? Would you not get gas at a station where it was .10 cheaper per gallon?

Why is it suddenly wrong when a corporation does it?

Its wrong when it impacts the nation negatively. Nations cant thrive when jobs are constantly going overseas. Sure, build plants and cut costs around the world...but the government should make sure corporations are rewarded for stimulating the American economy. Not pulling a Romney Bain Capital move, and buying an Italian company and then funneling its profits through Luxemborg so Italy nor America ever sees any of it...despite Bain being an American firm that profits from our business atmosphere.

Teaching at 35k a year is not a high paying job. Better yet, go to a trade school instead of college and get a job as a plumber or carpenter, they are making a killing right now.

Problem is, too many people have liberal arts majors and don't want to work.

You said liberal arts and I immediately thought "lol women". But hell...a lot more guys are getting those degrees nowadays as well. I mean...we do need teachers and what not...but because of the economic down turn, we arent in a teacher drought, and more college kids need to be smart about what they want for a career.

Its not always about money though. Plenty of kids actually enjoy teaching. Let them have at it then. Money isnt everything, but it sure makes life more comfy.

Why would we have to do that? People save a LOT of money by paying less for goods. That money is then spent on other goods, thus providing more jobs.

Seriously, it makes no sense to say we should pay higher prices for stuff. It isn't any better. Increased productivity means we pay LESS for stuff so we can buy MORE.

Im just not the biggest fan of cheap products being made overseas by underpaid workers when Americans need jobs right now. Im saying that if our jobs werent all around the world, that more Americans would have money for better, higher quality things.

If you have traveled so much, then you know those "peanuts" can buy a lot in India or China or overseas.

They are peanuts to us because our pay is so much more and our cost of living is so much higher. But not so high that a family cannot get by one one wage, even if it is only 35k a year.

But with American cost of living comes American freedom and values. I wouldnt want to live in an overpopulated, air polluted and communist place like China. Unless I could get into Hong Kong...Im not sure how living is there. I know they use different currency and basically run themselves.

No, it means you still need to study economics and travel the world a bit more.

I have studied economics, and I have friends and colleagues who have traveled the world, as much, if not more than you...and theyd laugh if they read this thread talking about feminism and homosexuality as something that ruins a society, economic system or wages.

 

[ScottMustaine]

Men are emasculated because men are no longer needed. The world has been conquered, there is nothing to explore, there are no great battles to be fought or nature to conquer. We are beyond that, to the point where our entire world has become a large park instead of an untamed and seemingly endless wilderness.

Even women aren't needed anymore. We're all pretty much androgynous in our behaviour and appearance and this self selection will affect future generations making them softer and weaker and cuter overall. Yes a larger gene pool means that you have more variation and you will still have genetic freaks that break world records. But overall humans are slowly becoming self-domesticated. Being alive and surviving in modern society requires no brain or willpower or survival instinct. In fact, it's the opposite. Those that thrive do well with less of these characteristics in our society. Those that have more aggressive characteristics are shunned or imprisoned.

There is no solution.

What about the other planets ?


I noticed as well that women like guys who got female characteristics, you know , a tad skinny, no beard, no body hair, female clothing etc etc.

I on the other hand am since the 16th year, a grizzly bear after not shaving 3 for days.

Long fine hair that hits around half of my back actually made me look even more agressive. I look like David Gilmour in his young days. 85% same.

Though trust me, there are still many MANY girls who like guys with male characteristics.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Lawyer ordered to pay $4.5M to gay U-M student

http://www.boston.com/news/educatio...QtzTYdkMjT7Y8n0RW9O/story.html?camp=obnetwork

The U.S. District Court jury ruled in favor of Christopher Armstrong, who claimed he suffered distress after a blog created by Andrew Shirvell accused him of enticing minors with alcohol and recruiting people to become homosexual.

What bothers me most is this:
http://www.andrewshirvell.net/

And that defamation is, of course, perfectly ok. That's what people hate about gay rights - we've passed the point of gay people having equal rights than straight people, and now they have more rights.

I don't hate gays; I hate bullies. I felt bad for gays in the 80s when all they wanted was to not get beaten up. I think that was and is a very reasonable request. I wish the Iranians would stop executing gays. And I would like to think that if I happened upon a gay-bashing, I would fight to defend the victim. But these days, in the court room and especially in academia, it is anyone who disagrees at all with the homo agenda who is now the bullied victim.

 

[Burroughs]

lesbian faked attack...the agenda at work folks..faggots run amuck.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/nebraska-w...-anti-gay-hate/story?id=17057847#.UDWWjc38Kgk

a comment from the site: "This illustrates the slippery slope that " Hate " crime legislation has delivered to us ! Is a homosexual life worth more than a heterosexual one ??? Black more than white ? Equality does not begin with unequal treatment !These "laws" have created a faulse sense of victimization . In this case there was no animosity so Miss Rogers manufactured some , She should be ashamed , as should the so called LGBT " community " People are not " rightous " because of thier sexual orientation ...Burn that rainbow flag , and unite under the Red , White , and Blue!"

 

[Bible_Belt]

There was a shooting at the Empire State Building today. I am yet to read anyone specifically say that the shooter was gay, but it sounds like it to me.

http://newyork.newsday.com/news/nyp...-building-was-disgruntled-ex-worker-1.3924799

Johnson, described as a disgruntled former employee, had worked as a designer of women's (fashion) accessories at Hazan Imports Corp., of 10 W. 33rd St., where he had been laid off about a year ago. Police identified the victim only as a 41-year-old former co-worker. Kelly said the victim and the suspect "had been accusing each other of harassment." He did not provide specifics.

graphic photos with lots of blood:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/n....html?hp&utm_source=buffer&buffer_share=0a621

http://gawker.com/5937627/graphic-photos-of-alleged-empire-state-building-shooter

 

[LiveFreeX]

I concur

as a current resident, I can tell you that things here are MUCH better than they are in the USA.

People make much less money but the economy is geared to them. If you only make 2500 month RMB (the current going rate), you can still afford a 2 bedroom apartment, food, transportation and a bit of extra spending money at the end of the month. My wife has a 4 year degree and can earn about 3000 RMB/month. (she is 23, I am 32) My salary is about 8 times hers.

the rmb is 6.3 to the dollar.

Cost of your average plate of italian sphagetti: 9 rmb.. (restaurant)
Cost of a bowl of lanzhou:la mien: 7 rmb. (restaurant)
Milk tea (bubble tea): 7 rmb.
Visit to the doctor: 100 rmb.
Medication: 20 rmb.
Bus ride: 1 rmb.
Metro: 1.80 rmb.
New button up shirt: 15 rmb.
T-shirt: 5 rmb.
Sneakers: 30 rmb.
PSP: 800 rmb.


I live in the second most expensive city in China.
I use to live in a second tier city, the costs were half of what they are here.
I lived in a 3rd tier city also, the costs are half of the second tier.... out there you can buy a house for 120,000 rmb. In the country side you can buy a house for 20 to 30,000 rmb.

Just like to add that I get bombarded with requests from hot single 20 yearold women for marriage proposals to one night stands. Women here WANT to get married, WANT to have babies and WANT to make families. SurpriseSurprise, next super power doesn't include feminisim.