The Homo Movement in America Is Out of Control, Rex Got Flashed

[Alle_Gory]

Men in the west are emasculated because they have no power. It has been stripped of them.

It was given away by ignorant betas. Power cannot be taken away.

The traditional family as destroyed by feminists and a misandric court system, not by income levels or job availability, or an affordable house.

The traditional family requires all those in order to exist. The traditional family is the woman stays at home and takes care of all that, the man goes and works. Low wages means you need both partners working to survive.

And I'm not talking about houses, I'm talking about housing in general... apartments, condos, whatever.

The feminists never built a house, they just torched the man.

The feminists have whatever power we give them. And the power they have is given down by the government. The corrupt, inept and suffocating government filled with beta males. There's very few effective men in government, most are just whiny old men.

I'm surprised anything gets done with the fossils in charge.

I'll keep yelling until I'm blue in the face, don't worry about that. Thanks but I'm all full on sage advice from over analyzing, "It's all too hard" Keyboard jockeys, 11 years my junior. As a matter of fact listening to "equalists" is what got us in this sh!t fight in the first place.

There's nothing wrong with equality. What we have is not equality, what we have is special treatment for certain groups.

Keep yelling till you're blue, but does that change anything? Will you have an effect?

 

[( . )( . )]

Keep yelling till you're blue, but does that change anything? Will you have an effect?

You bet your leftist indoctrinated lifestyle ass it is, the internet has been a Godsend for this. Yeah sure it's a validation haven for attention seeking facebook sluts but at the same time it's red pilling young men daily. Make no mistake the pendulum is going to swing back.

And yes I'm congruent, you needn't concern yourself with that. I speak of this off the internet also. I don't think I could call myself a man if I didn't.

 

[Love Me Do]

Alle Gory, why do Liberals always lose?

Ask yourself that.


Liberals are losers.

 

[Alle_Gory]

I speak of this off the internet also. I don't think I could call myself a man if I didn't.

I can respect that.

 

[Burroughs]

When asked about the reasons for the British navy's supremacy Winston Churchill replied “rum, buggery and the lash.”

the faggot movement is systemic

 

[Boilermaker]

alle; you look like you are having strong opinions on a matter where you don't have a lot of information.

As a rule: Facts first, opinions later.

You may disagree with Mr. Tits, but you need to get up to where he is right now in order to fight back. He clearly has thought (and read) more on this subject than you.

You don't have a case ... What is your one-line summary? How do you back that up? What are your references on this?
I would go and read more before lashing out another meaningless response.

 

[( . )( . )]

When asked about the reasons for the British navy's supremacy Winston Churchill replied “rum, buggery and the lash.”

the faggot movement is systemic

Winston Churchill, a great man now seen as a right wing "extremist". Phuck Disney, this is the man we should have frozen. Here's some more.

The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

We contend that for a nation to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle.

Bessie Braddock: “Sir, you are drunk.”
Churchill: “Madam, you are ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.”

Nancy Astor: “Sir, if you were my husband, I would give you poison.”
Churchill: “If I were your husband I would take it.”

You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else.

Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.

The whole history of the world is summed up in the fact that, when nations are strong, they are not always just, and when they wish to be just, they are no longer strong.

 

[Jaylan]

Lmao @ some of the illogical and unproven "facts" some of you are throwing around. Let me just say, as someone who knows international business, feminism is not the cause of low wages. Greedy corporations who care about profits are the reason. As a population inside a country gets bigger, theres more competition for work which means less wages...and then once countries start expanding overseas, they see that other nations dont have much for wage laws so they put jobs over there.

Feminism has nothing to do with why corporations are so greedy. And countries that US companies generally outsource too have never truly had feminist waves like we have had here...so low wages are not the fault of feminists. Its the fault of corporate greed and poor regulations that dont protect American jobs.

 

[Bible_Belt]

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162...e-group-blames-shooting-on-reckless-rhetoric/

Conservative group blames shooting on "reckless rhetoric"

August 16, 2012

(CBS/AP) WASHINGTON - The president of a conservative group blamed "reckless rhetoric" from organizations who disagreed with its opposition to abortion and same-sex marriage for a shooting that led one guard wounded.

At a press conference Thursday, Family Research Council president Tony Perkins made the comments a day after Floyd Lee Corkins, II, allegedly opened fire inside the lobby for the influential Christian organization's D.C. headquarters.

"Corkins was given a license to shoot an unarmed man by organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center that have been reckless in labeling organization hate groups because they disagree with them on public policy," Perkins said, referring how the law center, which tracks and litigates hate groups, labeled the FRC as a hate group in 2010 because of what it called its anti-gay stance...

 

[Voice]

I'd consider myself more moderate-conservative or even libertarian. I have yet to come across a gay person in my life that has somehow threatened my masculinity. I could honestly care less about gay people getting married or fvcking each other in the ass. In fact, I could care less if a guy wanted to marry a fvcking chicken. As long as it's not my chicken I don't fvcking care. How does it effect me? I've met plenty of gay people who are generally good people. I've met some gay people who aren't good people. I've met gay people who I wouldn't mind having a beer with and some gay people who I have absolutely nothing in common with. I've also met a lot of gay people who are MORE masculine than some of you vaginas on this board. I know it sounds like I know way too many gay people, but hey I went to a liberal university.

To OP: How does having some random, crazy, insane person running with his d1ck flapping around threaten your masculinity? I would probably be offended or rather shocked and disgusted, but I wouldn't in turn hate all gay people because some random homo happened to forget to take his antipsychotics.

The reason why there is so much hate in this world is because people generalize about groups of people who aren't like them. Stubbornness and laziness is largely responsible for people not judging others as individuals.

 

[Alle_Gory]

Alle Gory, why do Liberals always lose?

Ask yourself that.

Liberals are losers.

You're on thin ice after you spammed us with that porn "blog". I voted in your favor, to keep you here and not ban you. Should I do the same next time?

Second warning. Contribute if you like, but this is worthless crap. This website if for 13 years of age and older.

Your blog is also bad and you should feel bad.

What is your one-line summary?

Everyone is deserving of equality and freedom. Nothing less, nothing more. Their freedom ends where mine beings.

How do you back that up?

I don't know... the Constitution, the Bill of Rights?

Low wages are a result of feminism (increasing the supply of the labor pool), unions for pricing labor out of the market, and the fiat currency system with the power of compound interest on the debt.

I know, I already mentioned this. As far as unions... unions don't make for low wages. Unions make for higher wages by clawing money away from executives and shareholders.

Housing is still affordable, it just may not be the house you want, but it's still affordable (problem is, peopel don't care what they afford, they just buy what they want on credit). Nor are income levels and job availability the primary cause of destroying the traditional family.

I disagree with this, because you prove my point a little bit later...

It is caused by removing the accountability from people. They all have the latest cars, flat screens and i-tools. Never caring about the debt they amass or living within their means. Why do you think there are so many advertisements with the "Buy now, no payments for 36 months"? So that people can have things now and be enslaved to them later. THAT is what requires people to work two jobs to support a family (whether it is both parents working or one parent with two jobs).

Well, the problem is if we didn't have this crap people would be out of even more work. Imagine if you will, all the crap in the world is no longer produced. Now what? Where are the jobs? You buy a stove, that thing lasts forever, the stove makers need less workers. Bam! People on the street.

Gadget makers, as seen on TV garbage, no longer needed. Bam! People on the street, most in China but there are executives and designers here.

The latest iGadget? Bam! Everyone working for Apple on the street. Apple no longer exists. Everything replaced with standard OEM hardware and commodity Linux, like the Army uses. Built to last, not be pretty.

Retail stores? Now you need less. More people on the street.

So while I agree with you about what the right thing to do is, the effects of doing that are pretty severe.

Maybe this is why so much money was thrown away during that bailout on useless crap.

My brother is a teacher with three children and a wife. He is the only worker in the house. He lives within his means and they don't have the latest awesome i-tool. But they do fine as a traditional family with their own house, two cars and even a retirement fund.

And you proved my point. Your brother can afford to have a traditional family. He can afford to keep his wife at home. And he can afford to be at work kicking ass like men should be. Imagine if this happened on a larger scale and most families could afford to live with just the husband working.

Socially things would be more stable because men would run things. Most women REALLY want to work, do they?

 

[Jaylan]

Jaylan,

So where have you traveled on business? What countries do you have sites in? I have been to Shanghai, South Africa, France, Switzerland, UK, Hong Kong, Mumbai, and Brazil all on business. I work with them all on a weekly basis actually.

But if you haven't done that much in that arena, what knowledge do you have regarding economics? One of my degrees is in economics.

Feminism DOUBLED the labor pool in the US. When you shift the supply curve right, you get lower prices. It is a simple economic fact.

Corporations pay the market price. Opening up the US also worked to lower the price of labor even more. Hence lower wages.

So if you started buying gas at a cheaper gas station, does that make you greedy?

Why is a corporation greedy when they lower their costs?

I can cite sociological and economic reports that back up my last post (reports from financial and educational institutions). Do you have anything to back up your point of view aside from personal anecdotes? If not then this discussion is over. Also, you talk about feminism doubling the job pool....um...immigration had a huge affect on wages, as well as outsourcing. Please look at some national population figures, as well as outsourcing wage figures.

PS - Ill present the information that backs up my claims if youd like to continue this discussion. And please, this time stay on topic and dont deflect by making any character attacks.

 

[Alle_Gory]

Also, you talk about feminism doubling the job pool....um...immigration had a huge affect on wages, as well as outsourcing. Please look at some national population figures, as well as outsourcing wage figures.

Those ALL have an effect on wages and employment. ALL OF THEM.

 

[Jaylan]

I'm not sure what point you are talking about, but any family can live with just the husband working they just choose not to. We are just in a "everything for me, right now" mode of thought. The concept of "no yet" is lost on people.

Im not sure where you live, but in many areas of the country, its hard to live off of one income and still live comfortably with two kids. And this is without two cars and designer clothes.

You mean the same financial institutions who promote debt for creating prosperity?

Feminism doubled the labor force without increasing the consumer demand via population growth.

Immigration is different because it also introduced another consumer at the same time.

Consumer demand? You mean cheap immigrants who buy very low cost products at mega corps (like Walmart and others) which hire immigrants and also outsource jobs to other lands. And many immigrants send a lot of their money to their home country. I dont see how they are really stimulating the economy.

Besides, far for women than immigrants were joining the workforce during the growth of feminism, as shown by the two charts below.

In fact, immigration was among it's lowest points when feminism started to really gain traction in the 50's, 60's and 70's.

http://www.freeby50.com/2010/10/historical-look-at-womens-participation.html
http://www.cairco.org/reference/us-population-data

This graph seems to exactly show what I originally said

Look at the population growth from 1970 to 2010...and look at the jump of women (especially moms) in the workforce as well during that same time. They seem to happen along the same time, and Im saying uncontrolled immigration and outsourcing had a much larger affect on American wages than feminism really did. As both graphs see a large jump near the same years, its obvious a lot of those women came from the immigration pool (many legally of course)

Feminism didnt allow women to all of a sudden be able to do every single job American men could do. But outsourcing and immigration sure made it so other men who werent born here, could do the jobs American men were tailored for. Despite Feminism....back in the 50s 60s and 70s, there were still largely cultural measures in place that made it so certain jobs remained womens work, and certain jobs were dominated still by American men. Immigration and outsourcing through a wrench in that.

Outsourcing began later, and was an additional cause to the lowering of wages. But again, why is a corporation not allowed to lower their costs?

Why not blame the corporations. They are at the bottom of this. Not women....not feminism. I dont give a damn if American born women want to work to help sustain their family. I applaud that. I will however be suspicious of a company that ships production to Korea, Mexico, and China...or a company that largely highers undocumented migrant workers.

Those are the larger culprits here

PS - My anecdote is proof that a family CAN live off of one average wage. You don't need national statistics to prove that, you need an EXAMPLE.

As I said....many places around the country, its near impossible to live off of one income. Not everyone lucks out on a high paying job.

You want wages to go up? Tell Fender to stop making Mexican made, and Korean made Stratocasters. They wont because they want to have cheap workers to make cheap products. They arent like the Rickenbacher company which only makes guitars and basses in their American plant at good wages and a fair price given their craftsmanship. You can also tell Walmart to make sure all of their workers are legal Americans.

American women not working will make it tons harder for a lot of families to get by.

Those ALL have an effect on wages and employment. ALL OF THEM.

Lets say feminism did have this huge effect on wages like some people think. Even if it did affect male wages, did it still not increase family gross income? Its become a lot more expensive to live in America over the last few generations...problem is greedy companies would rather cut costs and ship jobs out of country, or give them to immigrants who will work for peanuts.

For people to sit and blame feminism and homosexuals as the big evils that changed so many things in this country is disingenuous in my book.

 

[( . )( . )]

Gaylan the habitual defender of feminism and faggotry

For people to sit and blame feminism and homosexuals as the big evils that changed so many things in this country is disingenuous in my book.

That's because your a lesbian.

 

[Jaylan]

That's because your a lesbian.

I see you have provided us with a typical pathetic character attack because you can offer no rebuttal to my comments. Why behave immaturely and make baseless character attacks? If you feel so strongly about your beliefs, engage me in a debate. All I ever see you do is get upset and slander people when they disagree with you. Either be a mature 36 year old adult and respond to my points, or dont waste thread space.

 

[( . )( . )]

I see you have provided us with a typical pathetic character attack because you can offer no rebuttal to my comments. Why behave immaturely and make baseless character attacks? If you feel so strongly about your beliefs, engage me in a debate. All I ever see you do is get upset and slander people when they disagree with you. Either be a mature 36 year old adult and respond to my points, or dont waste thread space.

My apologies, but come on mate to be fair it was an easy mistake to make.

Get it right =)

you talk about feminism doubling the job pool....um.

For people to sit and blame feminism and homosexuals as the big evils that changed so many things in this country is disingenuous in my book.

The smiley faces, the "um" the "wow...just wow" chick speak faux shock shaming type attitude all your posts seem to have, the affinity you have toward feminism and the faggot agenda. I just presumed you were a chick.

 

[Jaylan]

I must be missing something here. Why are my use of smileys to convey tone being labeled as feminine, yet you say nothing when others do the same thing or when others outright insult people they debate? It would seem to me that you are only critical of these things if they accompany a position that you disagree with.

Again, it still seems you are unable to be an adult and actually refute the points I have made. In which case I wont waste time responding to someone who again falls back onto character attacks like "faggot" and "chick faux shaming"

If anything, I constantly see you shame others for disagreeing with you...as is the case at this very moment. Hypocrisy at its finest.

 

[Alle_Gory]

If anything, I constantly see you shame others for disagreeing with you...as is the case at this very moment.

Yeah, he gets pissy sometimes. Deal with it. Try throwing his own sh*t back at him. Most people can't stand that, makes them snap after awhile.

 

[( . )( . )]

I must be missing something here.

That ones too easy...must ...not.


Live love laugh teehee xxoxx