devilkingx2
Master Don Juan
so you just totally gave up on having an argument huh? you said the same wrong thing like 4 times.Wrong again. It is totally relevant because money was a factor in the current situation of that person. Meaning, without money, that person would be in a worse situation.
There is no way for you to win. But you can keep trying if you want.
Money was a factor in improving that person's situation. Therefore, money is important in that situation. Therefore, you are wrong.
The tools cost money. You only have them because someone paid for them at some point. It doesn't matter who spent the money. What matters is money is a factor in making the situation BETTER for that person.
There is no avoiding money. Unless you want to be a mountain man living with wolves.
Here in the modern world, money is very, very, very important and it effects all facets of life.
There is no getting around it. Keep trying if you want.
since you've taken it to such illogical heights, "without money" could only mean an economic system without money, which could be a barter based economy which has existed many times in the past (think: i'll trade you my donkey for a dozen carrots, with the value being solely whatever is agreed upon by the participants of the trade)... which would mean that you are STILL wrong.
otherwise, we've already went over how you could survive without money, and the fact thtat you have to start making exceptions "Unless you want to be a mountain man living with wolves" further proves my point.
plenty of people irl live in the middle of nowhere. the midwest is full of that.