CyranoDeBergerac
Master Don Juan
PRL, I can't begin to sort the crap from the tripe in this post. While completely avoiding any gratutious or unmeritted flaming I can honestly say that is the most foul piece of convoluted and unsubstantiated logic that I have ever seen you pursue on this forum.Originally posted by PuertoRican_Lover
The main issue in the 21st century will not be sexuality, rather it will be one of economical and political dynamics where nations will vie for power to have influence and control over their own regional resources, without the interference of European nations (including America).
In the 21st century and beyond, India and China along with the rest of Asia will be at the forefront of the mental resource war and will dominate and have intellectual, scientific, and economical influence across the globe. The US and other European nations, in their declining intellectual and economical state and dwindling world influence, (because of their dwindling mental resources due to their low birth rate) will try to prevent this loss in superiority, even if war is necessary!
The emphasis in this thread regarding the declining birth rate, is only relevant to the developed nations (i.e. Europeans) where whites are the majority. Every other Peoples inhabiting the earth have a increasing birth rate and are extensively populated. Also, this issue doesn't concern Hispanics and Blacks in America, their families are larger than the average white family for many reasons already listed here.
What Pook is concerned about, is the mental capital that these countries rely on to maintain and increase economical development in their own country and to hold on to their existing superior political status in the world - this issue is only a concern to White European nations, since they are the ones mostly affected.
European nations have been in a decline and losing their grip on the world power scene in the last 60years.To this I say don't fret, because China, and other Asian countries, along with India will be where the new mental capital will come from in the next 100 years. Most scientific advancements in the last few hundred years, in all fields of human endeavor have been derived from European minds. This will change soon as these other countries build their infrastructure and better their educational systems.
American and Britain are desperately trying to maintain their status as ‘leading’ nations by fabricating the current invasion in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and trying to control the resources in the Central Asian region for dominance of the oil supply.
One of the main objectives of the current war is to not allow the abundant oil resources in that region to get in the hands of China and other European and Asian nations who the US fears would surpass us economically in the decades to come, and thus become a greater power politically and undercut the influence of the United States in world affairs. This was a preemptive oil grab to keep it away from our competitors on the world market. Chavez in Venezuela said that hew ill stop selling the US oil if the CIA tried to do another coup.
Pres. Bush himself said his purpose of the war was to try to control the whole Middle East region by changing their governments. Israel is behind this move and welcomes this takeover wholeheartedly, because it benefits them well in getting rid of their enemies once and for all.
Israel was the instigator behind this whole current conflict, working in tandem with the US. Everyone in the world knows this except Americans, because our media is tightly censored and controlled and only mainly used for entertainment and propaganda purposes.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, in his arrogance, explains this preplanned Middle East / Central Asia takeover in his book, “The Grand Chessboard” WRITTEN IN 1997!. It gives you a step-by-step account of what the US plans to do to dominate that region. Every Head of government in the world knows that this is the real purpose of the war and this is why they did not form a coalition with the US. They actually were against Bush!! Bush said “Either you are with me or against me!!!” Oh well we know the answer to that don’t we – the world is against him / the US!!!!
Oh yeah, back to the declining birth rate. This a non-issue on a global scale, and only concerns European nations in fear of losing their world dominance and stranglehold of the undeveloped nations of the earth. Asia with China and Japan at the forefront, along with India will take the place of Europe and America as being the new leaders in mental resources and scientific discoveries.
A new world war will envelope the earth because America, Britain and other European nations will want to dominate other nations against their will for world dominance – that was what the last two world wars were about, why not the third World War – it has been building up for this!!!! There will be a major population decrease in the billions!!! No such thing as overpopulation!!
Your argument can be summarized as 'screw whitey', despite the fact that the very reason you can voice this opinion, and the reason you're doing it in English, quoting a Book that was written by Carter's former national security advisor is because the very system for which you cry "The king is dead, long live the king" has been around long enough to have a sufficient impact anyway.
The global declining birth-rate is strictly a European problem? Why do you think these countries have only noticed marginal losses in their population where they've noticed anything other than gain at all? Immigration, as CLOONEY said has propped up the populations of these countries. If anything the decline in the birth-rate poses less of a problem for the 'European countries' than it does for those countries with developing economies, like say Puerto Rico who has profitted mightily from America's tolerance and her many blessings. The simple fact that we haven't annexed Puerto Rico and made her our fifty-first state, instead preferring to let her have the choice of how she should live and under what auspices should be argument enough to refute your outdate cries of imperialism.
You're arguments are so absurd that I cannot think upon them but I am reminded of an angry revolutionary who's ideas are shaped not by fact or reason, but by unresolved anger issues with his father and a complete inability to take any responsible look at their own state of affairs, preffering instead to be ruled by feelings of being shorted by society. Get help. Now.
-CyranoDeBergerac