speed dawg said:
What are we going to do to oppose it? We are completely crippled in this regard and no one will unite because of the public consequences. I'm not risking being fired when I have a family to support.
The average person doesn't even care about immigration and even will deny it is or could be a problem. They vote for Obama and other democrats all the way down to the local politician level, which is voting for immigration and sanctuary cities for aliens. People could sign up for numbersusa, maybe send some easy faxes to their congressmembers. There's no consequences for telling politicians you want immigration law enforced, and you want less legal and illegal immigration.
The reasons there can be consequences for opposing anti-white progressivism is because whites are not united, not the other way around. Whites are still 62% of the population and own allowing this crap to go on. Even smaller towns in KY are getting muslim refugees seeded there. Go to Refugee watch website and see all the white towns all around the country being seeded with somalians and other muslims and immigrants.
The republican congress recently was going to withhold funding to DHS to block Obama's illegal amnesty and benefits for illegal aliens executive action. But the public would not support the republican congressmembers doing that. Congress can shut must of this stuff down with the power of the purse and with legislation but the public is not supporting that.
Remember though, people only want to die-versify areas with money. There are plenty of 100% white areas in KY and WV that can't be diversified because no one will go there.
So really the only way to stay un-die-versified is to not broadcast money and resources everywhere.
The government isn't putting illegal aliens and refugees in upper middle class and higher areas. It's putting them in working class, middle and lower middle class white areas. Of course they can't dieversify every poor rural area and there would be no need to ruin what is already in ruins. But the cities are being dieversified in non- upperclass areas and the suburbs of northern and previously very white areas.
You can live in a nice area, but the dieversity is still infesting most areas of the city, still costing you in tax expenses for numerous reasons, still taking up jobs, still causing living expenses to rise, still clogging the roadways where half the drivers are now towel heads or one of the 50 shades of brown.
This confirms my theory that liberalism/socialism is ALL firmly based in jealousy and envy. Even still, you have to have a big group to do that. That's why you have white flight, because no one can afford to take huge losses on their real estate so when one house in a neighborhood falls, they all do.
Yes it's about jealousy and envy but if you're white and male, progressives are still jealous even if you have a minimum wage job. Not everyone can afford to or is in a position to white flight. Like I said, so many immigrants or aliens have been let in that there's few places to fly to, very exclusive areas of the city or rural backwaters with no jobs and opportunities. Don't you see the elites are making it so there's no way out but for the wealthiest? They're actually making thing worse for themselves too but as long as it's not as bad for them as it is for everyone else then it's good for them.
Just one example, everyone should pressure congress to pass H.R. 140 (the birthright citizen act)
should-foreign-citizens-be-given-us-citizenship-because-their-parents-decided-visit-disney . That alone would be a big solution.