Talked with a woman for 2 hours at an Open House

[corrector]

So what?



Still simpin away, are we?

Do not have the time to argue. You mentioned two points on your post. First one was in your words "a colleage:. You then reply saying "so what?: you idiot. Reread your own post.

 

[We_ArE_VeNOM]

On ignore.

Yeah, do that.

 

[corrector]

"No Free Attention" represents Currie's (Alan Roger Currie's) personal philosophy that a man should never allow women to gain full and indefinite access to his non-sexual time, attention, and companionship unless he and that woman are business colleagues,

So what right?

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Dude, why you have to go be a prick about your responses? You clearly care less about the OP’s progress than you do about trying to flex that you’re some badass.

Those of us cheering him on have taken the time to get to know his situation and tribulations, we may not agree on things or how he has proceeded in the past, but we care about his personal progress and path to being more comfortable around females and approaches.

What have you ADDED TO THE CONVERSATION other than your vitriol and off the cuff assenine quips?

I feel that.

But still, no free attention.

If you give her the time, she needs to give you the azz.

It doesn't have to result in a 2-hour convo either.
You have to ask for the # after 2 hours.
I don't give a damn how socially awkward you are.

 

[corrector]

Yeah, do that.

Nah, I no longer think that's necessary. You clearly lost some rep points here by being so comically tone deaf that you should not be getting the better of me that I should have to go there.

 

[We_ArE_VeNOM]

Dude, why you have to go be a prick about your responses? You clearly care less about the OP’s progress than you do about trying to flex that you’re some badass.

Easy there, cupcake.

First off, I give the advice that I give, not because I don't care...but because I DO care.

And no I'm not gonna pat a guy on the back because he built up confidence to have a 2 hour conversation with a female colleague.

That is basically a date, and all I am saying is if you are gonna spend that much time with a female, the least you can do is ask for her DAMN NUMBER.

That can't be too much to ask..and if it is, then perhaps you can coddle, coach, and cheerlead him on to stop acting like women are monsters from Venus when all they are are human beings who won't bite your d!ck off just because you ask for their number or show remote interest in them.

Those of us cheering him on have taken the time to get to know his situation and tribulations, we may not agree on things or how he has proceeded in the past, but we care about his personal progress and path to being more comfortable around females and approaches.

Personal progress is; not giving women free attention.

But that is hard to do when some of you are just happy to have a woman talk to you.

What have you ADDED TO THE CONVERSATION other than your vitriol and off the cuff assenine quips?

What I add to the conversation?

I tell you guys what you NEED to hear, not what you want to hear. That is what I add.

Too much confirmation bias on here as it is.

 

[corrector]

Easy there, cupcake.

First off, I give the advice that I give, not because I don't care...but because I DO care.

And no I'm not gonna pat a guy on the back because he built up confidence to have a 2 hour conversation with a female colleague.

That is basically a date, and all I am saying is if you are gonna spend that much time with a female, the least you can do is ask for her DAMN NUMBER.

That can't be too much to ask..and if it is, then perhaps you can coddle, coach, and cheerlead him on to stop acting like women are monsters from Venus when all they are are human beings who won't bite your d!ck off just because you ask for their number or show remote interest in them.

She is a colleage so I already have her number. My post said that we texted with each other afterwards. How can you text without a number? Did you even read my original post? Do you even read your own posts?

Your post was not about asking for a number. Your post was asking her about sex (ie after she reveals she is with a partner with four kids) in the middle of an Open House. (ie which by the way is the worst anti-seduction thing you could do. These things tend to come organically if there is allot of tension and you start "making out" and going from there. You don't just bring that topic up like that without making things awkward.)

You are looking more like a hater. When someone like me makes a minsicule of progress it somehow threatens you. Lets call it what it is.

 

[RazorRambo24]

What do you mean?

Ignore bad advice. The fact that you are socializing is good. For someone in your position and based off your post history and what I know of you, you're doing good. Just keep being cordial, get more and more used to socializing and hanging out with women and the rest should play itself out.

Dude, why you have to go be a prick about your responses? You clearly care less about the OP’s progress than you do about trying to flex that you’re some badass.

Those of us cheering him on have taken the time to get to know his situation and tribulations, we may not agree on things or how he has proceeded in the past, but we care about his personal progress and path to being more comfortable around females and approaches.

What have you ADDED TO THE CONVERSATION other than your vitriol and off the cuff assenine quips?

Some of these guys live vicariously through books and articles they read about women. I pay attention to what people post and some guys just do alot of talking but you can almost tell they're not really ideal when it comes to having solid experience with women. I think they don't realize their posts speak volumes.

Corrector is talking about a business colleague he had a good time socializing iwth, nothing more nothing less. For him this is great progress as most of us know and are aware of. Some people don't even read anyones posts on here but love to hear themselves talk.. but you can smell the dryness in their experiences or lack of with women from a mile away. Prob why they spend so much time reading about "game" and social dynamics than actually speak of their own experiences.

For someone to come here and sh.t on his progress says a lot about them.

I mean one, he made a BOLD assumption taht there was no numbers exchanged when his post clearly says he texted her after. Also seems like he didn't even really read everything corrector wrote. No need to even pay attention to dudes like that.

 

[We_ArE_VeNOM]

So what right?

"he and that woman are business colleagues,"

Context is important here.

Alan Roger Currie (if you are familiar with his work) had let it be known that..

1. He is (was) not into small, trivial conversations (with men or women).

2. When it comes to women, unless the woman is helping him with his BUSINESS or helping him get money, he didn't spend much nonsexual time with women...unless she was a friend with benefits.

Obviously, if your job requires you to work alongside women, you will have to spend nonsexual time with them and even have nonsexual conversations with them.

But not 2 hour long conversations without attempting to get at her.

That's not how we (guys with no free attention mentality) roll.

Obviously, you do.

So, do you.

 

[We_ArE_VeNOM]

Ignore bad advice.

Yeah, my advice is no free attention.

If that advice is wrong, then I don't want to be right.

Btw, I would respect you more if you talk to me, instead of at me.

I mean one, he made a BOLD assumption taht there was no numbers exchanged when his post clearly says he texted her after.

Yeah, I will take the L on that.

But guess what, even with the number, he is still giving her free attention..attention that she hasn't earned yet.

So despite my blunder on the number tip, the focal point of my argument still stands.

No free attention.

Also seems like he didn't even really read everything corrector wrote.


No need to even pay attention to dudes like that.

He doesn't have to pay attention to me, when he has so many guys like you on here encouraging his beta mindset.

Here is what is gonna happen..

1. Hundreds of texts back and forth with the woman.

2. A few conversations over the phone.

3. A date will be set up, eventually.

4. Of course, he will pay for the date.

5. After the date, no sex.

6. A repeat of 1-5, for at least one to two times.

7. OP will come on the forum, asking for advice for how to progress things.

8. You guys offer your weak advice.

9. I offer my Mode One advice, and criticize him for not doing it earlier.

10. He doesn't listen to my advice, but listen to you guys weak advice.

11. In the end, he still doesn't smash.

12. You guys pat him on the back like," but hey, look how far you've come."

Sounds about right.

 

[corrector]

Yeah, my advice is no free attention.

If that advice is wrong, then I don't want to be right.

Btw, I would respect you more if you talk to me, instead of at me.



Yeah, I will take the L on that.

But guess what, even with the number, he is still giving her free attention..attention that she hasn't earned yet.

So despite my blunder on the number tip, the focal point of my argument still stands.

No free attention.



He doesn't have to pay attention to me, when he has so many guys like you on here encouraging his beta mindset.

Here is what is gonna happen..

1. Hundreds of texts back and forth with the woman.

2. A few conversations over the phone.

3. A date will be set up, eventually.

4. Of course, he will pay for the date.

5. After the date, no sex.

6. A repeat of 1-5, for at least one to two times.

7. OP will come on the forum, asking for advice for how to progress things.

8. You guys offer your weak advice.

9. I offer my Mode One advice, and criticize him for not doing it earlier.

10. He doesn't listen to my advice, but listen to you guys weak advice.

11. In the end, he still doesn't smash.

12. You guys pat him on the back like," but hey, look how far you've come."

Sounds about right.

Like I'm going to pursue a woman who has a partner with 4 kids.

Seriously dude you remind me of this skit:

 

[Travel memoir21]

Hey good job man. Thats progress

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

So much posturing, so much vitriol. Again you can’t help self-aggrandizing pricks like you understand that their precious advice does not apply in this situation.

And listen buttercup anytime you want to measure up I’ll be glad to, in person.

Anytime.

You’d have to actually man up as opposed to hiding behind a keyboard, so chances are you’d never take up the opportunity, because you’re a pathetic little b1tch.

“but a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.”

You’re a greifer of the highest order and no more than a paper tiger.

Anytime b1tch.

Daytime, parking lot, anywhere within a 20 mile radius of SFO. Maybe we can get @Hamurabimbi and some of the other locals to come watch.

Here’s my preemptive response to whatever drivel you write next: “yeah didn’t think so.”

 

[Giovanni SouthSide]

Hey man , props on that. Now a days it’s no easy feat to iron clad a woman to stay engaged in a convo for 5 minutes let alone 2 hours. The woman gravitated to your proximity and conversationalist stimulation on some smooth operator sh1t.
Who gives a damn if you didn’t swak. I would have felt a major female social fix on that one.
All a day’s work to not rust out and keep sharpening the blade.

 

[AmsterdamAssassin]

Being able to talk with anyone about anything will help your game, so be a gregarious conversationalist and you'll soon be smooth talking the ladies.

 

[TheManMasenko]

August 31, 2023

SS hyped a depressed incel for talking to a woman (a person of the opposite gender of male) for 2 hours.

The bar is low.

If you’re reading this message try to figure out what you need to get off this website. For me it’s fitness..anyways..connect your real world experiences with SS experiences. Instead of taking advice on biased forum, go follow your heart (cheesy but true).

And the banging multiple woman a month type of **** you see on here…take it with a grain of salt. Personally, the greatest players I know weren’t on that level as some SS members claim. I don’t believe the players I know would even give two ****s about an online forum for woman or to post their success.

 

[corrector]

August 31, 2023

SS hyped a depressed incel for talking to a woman (a person of the opposite gender of male) for 2 hours.

The bar is low.

If you’re reading this message try to figure out what you need to get off this website. For me it’s fitness..anyways..connect your real world experiences with SS experiences. Instead of taking advice on biased forum, go follow your heart (cheesy but true).

And the banging multiple woman a month type of **** you see on here…take it with a grain of salt. Personally, the greatest players I know weren’t on that level as some SS members claim. I don’t believe the players I know would even give two ****s about an online forum for woman or to post their success.

Haters will hate. You are both a hater of the successful chad and incel. That is pathetic as you can't even hate right.

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

Some men must put down others to make themselves feel good about their own pathetic and potentially synthetic personas.

For example, I could not fathom a world where I can’t bed two attractive new women a month, even at my age. To others, it seems like a fabrication of reality, why? Because they cannot bear the idea that they have not had the experience, their fragile egos cannot handle it.

These also are the same type of people that would make fun of a man for making any progress at all, much less a breakthrough. Crabs in a bucket.

 

[needimprovement250]

Congrats man, things like that can definitely give you a confidence boost. I need something like that too, I haven’t talked to a woman in years unless it was required for work and even then it was only briefly. I’ve only ever had brief conversations with women all of them have been less than an hour.

 

[Millard Fillmore]

I don't know how that was possible, but it happened this past weekend. Spoke with this Cuban lady, who is is probalby a gen-Xer like myself (she's with a partner that has 4 kids) and was shocked to see how I managed to hold on a convo with her for around 2 hours. Granted, she was a mortgage broker and we are all trying to get new clients in this Open House. I was still surprized at how 2 hours went by like that chatting with her and had thought it was going to be crazy ackward and I'd end up using my Tablet to stream some shows. Virtually no awkard silenced within the chat.

I texted her saying it was a pleaure meeting her blah blah blah. She replied to the text and said the pleasure was all hers. (what?) I'm still trying to figure out how it was possible to have maintained a 2 hour chat, when with usual girls in public, I can't even do a 30 second chat. Must be a funny on and off switch somewhere.

What was the longest continuous chat you've ever had with a lady you just met? How many awkard silences had happened within the chat?

Nice work. FWIW, I don't think of pauses or silences as awkward. Let 'em happen. But it sounds like the convo flowed nicely for you and she was "encantada."