That’s an interesting statement. I have OBSERVED that the past matters in a great deal of things.
male or female. Different categories but the past absolutely matters
Ones past is the barometer by which one can estimate and adjust for as a certain or potential repeat. Good or bad. It’s an indicator of their personal survival strategy.
Let’s take a young woman just as an example. Girly typical. She encounters her first lover. Tons of sex. This does nothing harmful to her as long as all of it is consensual. So let’s say he starts enamored over her, this is a reasonable normal outcome. Or she wants a different man.
This is the make/break point by which she will start formulations of and to her personal survival strategy. Women are socially locked in to their female survival genetic encoding from birth just like men.
This is how she adds to or removes things from her methodology of sorting and adding or eliminating things. For the most part it is below her awareness but much of it isn’t. Socially it is all in her awareness. Instead of looking to herself, as a woman, she puts it into social deliberation and debate by her peers (girlfriends).
This is one of the largest differences between men and women. Many a boyfriend and husband has been wrecked by this social aspect of her survival. This is a horrible adaptation left over from tribal life. You take social driven women and put them together and you can have the most brutal destruction known to the world.
Men as they come of age they become more self aware of their decisions and the effects. Some are now converted to the feminine version of passing all their ills onto the other sex. Don’t worry about them, they are out of the game. Ridiculous men.
I will keep this in context. Instead of keeping her own council and selecting her own decisions, she defaults to the social norm. As a good person she knows she should be, knowing full well that men love very differently and are this easily manipulated for her to achieve her goals, she decides to engaging other men with the hopes of being bred (all sex is the dramatization of pro creation) by them. True she may have the Disney lover paradigm in her head, but the power social pressure is too great. She knows the boy thinks that they are boyfriend/girlfriend in his head. She KNOWS!!
But she follows the female social convention and just fuks other boys. Her boyfriend finds out and falls the ground thinking he is damaged. She sees the result of her actions and feels guilty for a day. Maybe longer. Then she gets some fuks in. Then she has two boys double team her. She wants to stop because sometimes she feels bad. So now she wants another boyfriend as she starts college. Social pressure makes it nearly impossible for this to end well for any type of boyfriend. But she gives it a go anyway. Soon she is getting pounded out by multitudes of men (EXTREMELY COMMON)
The boyfriend gets crushed and thinks he’s damaged. This time she only feels guilt for about 5 minutes. SHE KNOWS that he thought they were boyfriend/girlfriend. However, her BIOLOGICAL dualistic sexual strategy combined with the existing destructive social structure, she is completely under the control of the environment that she exists in.
Men being linear thinkers are infinitely more able to linearly think his way to more healthy deductions and far less associative reasoning. This keeps him more able to maintain individuality and individual thoughts and decisions. Well, we all want sex. Lol
This sets her sexual survival to this pattern of conduct. It was successful and had no serious repercussions like the ones men are subject to. STDs, pregnancy? Can be easily handled. Despite the fact that when she is coupled with a provider/boyfriend, she is extremely likely to go bareback when with the lover. Thus giving him 1st position to impregnate her.
In effect, she has now set her conduct to the rest of her life. Despite crushing her sexual value, and encoding poor survival neuro pathways into her physical structure she cannot stop. In a marriage or relationship further along, when she pairs up, her dualistic sexual strategy kicks in, she will be defenseless against it. She will default to her learned sexual survival strategy in an effort to fix or correct the loss of her Disney dream world.
By now she has perfected the invalidation tactics such as gaslighting to near perfection to not only hide her conduct but to protect her inherent dualistic sexual strategy. The social propaganda solution through feminism is in perfect alignment with that biological dualistic strategy. It is designed to destroy. Men are then programmed that invading her privacy as she sucks and fuks through her life and labeled controlling and all kinds of other such nonsense, they actually and stupidly go along with it.
“As long as his resources are involved it is ALWAYS his business and she has zero privacy.”
Any man who goes along with the social convention that he must “trust” or be labeled the stupid labels such as controlling, is a god damn fool. As well she has every right to inspect his so called privacy as well. Only a pathetic stupid woman would allowed her provider’s privacy when she knows his actions are suspect. A woman is given the right to control through manipulation and influence her provider. When a man does it? Prepare for hell on earth. Even if he ejects her to the curb, the state will still reward her with your resources and in worse case scenario, bill the whole nation with a tax bill to reward her.
Absolutely every inch of her past matters. In fact if every man was given a 30 minute mind video of her escapades he would, in most cases never, ever marry her. Women know this or they wouldn’t lie about it or hide it from her future life partner. End of story.
