Reputation is not useless. If a good amount of people use reputation properly, it works. If you bring down an idiot, but raise a great post, it helps to create the balance. Going into the Member List, and clicking the "Reputation" header will show you the top reputation earners.
Over time, if everyone starts and keeps using it properly, it can show someone that knows what they talk about.
What we really need is the number to show.
I agree with the
idea of a reputation feature being useful but I don't think the one we have makes much sense.
Like I said we have 3 different levels that I know of: an "unknown quantity" a "distinguished road" and "off the scale"
Now really, don't we need more than those three to cover such a wide variety of posters? Also, what's the order? Is being on a "distinguished road" better than being "off the scale"? Is being an "uknown quantinty" better than "off the scale"?
They need to cover the Reputation feature in the F.A.Q. page or somewhere else.
Also, I tried looking for my username on the ranking. I couldn't find my name within the first four pages and I was well below some made up troll jibberish like "#$%%(#" or other crazy listings like that. I guess I'm not Mr. Popular on this board but it is obvioius that a lot of trolls have been on here messing with reputations. What good is the Reputation System if it's so easily manipulated?