ilikecharlene
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2012
- Messages
- 336
- Reaction score
- 8
I often find PUA gurus are very condescending, in how they evaluate people and life in general.
I understand, like most people, that being a beta male is not good (duh). And for a number of valid reasons this is so (people are attracted to strong/confident people in general). But even if somebody is beta, so what? My honest view of sex/dating/relationships is that yes, people want sex and companionship, they'r natural, but often it's something society says we should chase after (especially our very sexualised culture). If needing/wanting sex is a true absolute, then explain asexuals, celibates, or monks? I don't believe there is a universal human nature, but that's a topic for another discussion.
Is it, to some extent, a high school mentality? Since because a PUA (or any dating coach) has a lot of dating experience, they presume themselves better for getting *****?
I understand, like most people, that being a beta male is not good (duh). And for a number of valid reasons this is so (people are attracted to strong/confident people in general). But even if somebody is beta, so what? My honest view of sex/dating/relationships is that yes, people want sex and companionship, they'r natural, but often it's something society says we should chase after (especially our very sexualised culture). If needing/wanting sex is a true absolute, then explain asexuals, celibates, or monks? I don't believe there is a universal human nature, but that's a topic for another discussion.
Is it, to some extent, a high school mentality? Since because a PUA (or any dating coach) has a lot of dating experience, they presume themselves better for getting *****?