ROOKIE OF THE YEAR said:
Howver, I believe people need to follow what is more reliable. For instance, we know jumping of the cliff is harmful because reliable evidence shows that gravity exists. (Gravity has been tested and proven. Something that Kung Fu lacks.) Something that sosuave.net also lacks. I'm not saying Savoy's people proved their methods are as reliable as gravity because human beings are different and unique. However, we can still distinguish between what works and what doesn't by tons of experiments.
I understand that you want a system that can be applied. Like Kung Fu. There are main techniques and complementary techniques to cover them.
Only problem is that Kung Fu is pretty weak. The best systems are no system. Look into something called Krav Maga. Its a brutal and extremely effective Israelli Martial art, its constantly being updated and refined. They do only what works. Improvisation as well as borrowing techniques from everybody. Kung Fu, Jiu Jitsu, dirty street fighting moves... etc. All losely packaged together into something entirely more brutal but constantly changing.
Now another problem is that Kung Fu is not for everybody. Even if the system IS super effective you have to have the body do do it. Some people are just not ft for Kung Fu but would be fit for a similar martial art that works on their strengths. For example, Jiu Jitsu because its more ground fighting. But to follow a rigid system like that and expect it to work all the time is another problem.
Wish you the best, but we both know this will be a repeat performance because you choose not to evaluate things and think for yourself. You want something pre-digested and contained inside a binder and while there are many available, none of them will really work for you because they are cookie cutter solutions.
But I guess some people like to be lead along by the hand. Not everyone can be a leader after all. If it was like that, the world would be chaos as everyone focuses on their own self-interests. Problem is, you're still following the wrong leader.