Rollo Tomassi
Master Don Juan
I was considering this thread on Sunday morning with my regular coffee - I do my best thinking then - but then the Christmas lights had to go up or I was never going to get to them, so I decided not to post. Funny how the solitude of being alone on the roof of your house makes for such good introspection.
Anyway, what I kept coming back to was Law of Power #17. I know I drop these left & right on SS, but they never fail to frame a situation perfectly:
Law 17: Keep Others in Suspended Terror: Cultivate an Air of Unpredictability
Humans are creatures of habit with an insatiable need to see familiarity in other people's actions. Your predictability gives them a sense of control. Turn the tables: Be deliberately unpredictable. Behavior that seems to have no consistency or purpose will keep them off-balance, and they will wear themselves out trying to explain your moves. Taken to an extreme, this strategy can intimidate and terrorize.
Think about this for a moment; Your predictability gives them a sense of control. Nowhere is this more true than for women, and that's the paradox. By nature, women are security-seeking. Even their biochemistry illustrates this. The potential parent in them needs that dependability, however it's the excitement that comes from unpredictability that stimulates arousal for them. JOPHIL and BLUE PHOENIX's stories are excellent examples. By not resorting to predictable, safe reactions they both trigger that excitement and indignation that gives them an arousal rush.
The predictable response would've been to appease these women in an effort to get back to an amicable state - the state most AFCs think is optimal for initiating sex. All this does is reinforce a woman's sexual agency and affirms what she knows already about AFCs (if not most men in general) - they will tolerate almost anything for sex. That's the implied control in failing a sh!t test. She's experienced this so often that it's a common and universal truth for her, particularly if she's above average in her physical appeal.
So it's the unpredictable guy that is set apart from the appeasers. The unpredictable Man is the one for whom sex is no object and therefore she has no agency over. This isn't to say he's asexual; far from it. It implies he at least believes he has other viable options for sex and intimacy. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant because this is where a woman's imagination - a Man's most valuable tool - proves it's value.
While it may be self-satisfying to walk away from a situation that doesn't meet with your approval, think about the messages this conveys to the woman involved. Her first impression is that your action is disrespectful. "I can't believe he did that!" That initial shock of indignation fires off all kinds of chemical reactions in her - chemical reactions she now associates with you.
Next comes retribution, as amply illustrated by JOPHIL's SW. Although most initial sh!t tests by and large are involuntary for women, the ones that follow the first rarely are. JOPHIL's next test was dealing with SW's attempt at retribution; she wanted him to accept shame and culpability for his act of walking out on her. This is a planned followup for rebuff of the first sh!t test. Generally it's a "you owe me an apology" for my bad behavior principle, and this is the bluff that most guys don't have the stomach to call. Unfortunately it's also the most important test of a guy's resolve, and the one that will put him promptly back into her frame. Sometimes it's more overt as in BLUE PHOENIX's girl crying "What do you want from me?!" line. Those are the real tough ones to pass.
The last phase will be reconciliation. At some point, assuming her IL is peaked enough, a woman's imagination will get the better of her. If you had the resolve enough to pass her retribution tests, odds are she's left with the impression that you have something of value beyond the average men she's used to. If not she'll write you off and save you both a lot of time. But assuming she is, remember that the chemical rush from the first indignation, is still a persistent association with you. Reconciliation comes in the form of her attempting to reestablish that association again. Two weeks later you get the call "Are we still cool? You want to go out some time?" etc. This is the reset. It's at this point that she's covertly surrendering the frame to you once again. Now is the time to reevaluate your investment in the girl and proceed accordingly.
So what have we learned? For women there is no greater stimulant than unpredictability, and no greater suspended terror than the competition anxiety, imagined or otherwise, that results from possibly losing a Man with value enough to pass her sh!t tests. In other words a focused association of unpredictability is an excellent means of displaying higher value.
Anyway, what I kept coming back to was Law of Power #17. I know I drop these left & right on SS, but they never fail to frame a situation perfectly:
Law 17: Keep Others in Suspended Terror: Cultivate an Air of Unpredictability
Humans are creatures of habit with an insatiable need to see familiarity in other people's actions. Your predictability gives them a sense of control. Turn the tables: Be deliberately unpredictable. Behavior that seems to have no consistency or purpose will keep them off-balance, and they will wear themselves out trying to explain your moves. Taken to an extreme, this strategy can intimidate and terrorize.
Think about this for a moment; Your predictability gives them a sense of control. Nowhere is this more true than for women, and that's the paradox. By nature, women are security-seeking. Even their biochemistry illustrates this. The potential parent in them needs that dependability, however it's the excitement that comes from unpredictability that stimulates arousal for them. JOPHIL and BLUE PHOENIX's stories are excellent examples. By not resorting to predictable, safe reactions they both trigger that excitement and indignation that gives them an arousal rush.
The predictable response would've been to appease these women in an effort to get back to an amicable state - the state most AFCs think is optimal for initiating sex. All this does is reinforce a woman's sexual agency and affirms what she knows already about AFCs (if not most men in general) - they will tolerate almost anything for sex. That's the implied control in failing a sh!t test. She's experienced this so often that it's a common and universal truth for her, particularly if she's above average in her physical appeal.
So it's the unpredictable guy that is set apart from the appeasers. The unpredictable Man is the one for whom sex is no object and therefore she has no agency over. This isn't to say he's asexual; far from it. It implies he at least believes he has other viable options for sex and intimacy. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant because this is where a woman's imagination - a Man's most valuable tool - proves it's value.
While it may be self-satisfying to walk away from a situation that doesn't meet with your approval, think about the messages this conveys to the woman involved. Her first impression is that your action is disrespectful. "I can't believe he did that!" That initial shock of indignation fires off all kinds of chemical reactions in her - chemical reactions she now associates with you.
Next comes retribution, as amply illustrated by JOPHIL's SW. Although most initial sh!t tests by and large are involuntary for women, the ones that follow the first rarely are. JOPHIL's next test was dealing with SW's attempt at retribution; she wanted him to accept shame and culpability for his act of walking out on her. This is a planned followup for rebuff of the first sh!t test. Generally it's a "you owe me an apology" for my bad behavior principle, and this is the bluff that most guys don't have the stomach to call. Unfortunately it's also the most important test of a guy's resolve, and the one that will put him promptly back into her frame. Sometimes it's more overt as in BLUE PHOENIX's girl crying "What do you want from me?!" line. Those are the real tough ones to pass.
The last phase will be reconciliation. At some point, assuming her IL is peaked enough, a woman's imagination will get the better of her. If you had the resolve enough to pass her retribution tests, odds are she's left with the impression that you have something of value beyond the average men she's used to. If not she'll write you off and save you both a lot of time. But assuming she is, remember that the chemical rush from the first indignation, is still a persistent association with you. Reconciliation comes in the form of her attempting to reestablish that association again. Two weeks later you get the call "Are we still cool? You want to go out some time?" etc. This is the reset. It's at this point that she's covertly surrendering the frame to you once again. Now is the time to reevaluate your investment in the girl and proceed accordingly.
So what have we learned? For women there is no greater stimulant than unpredictability, and no greater suspended terror than the competition anxiety, imagined or otherwise, that results from possibly losing a Man with value enough to pass her sh!t tests. In other words a focused association of unpredictability is an excellent means of displaying higher value.