Man with power can easily be beta, barack obama

[VikingKing]

Lol what power does Obama have? Being PRESIDENT? That's it, right? :crackup: Oh what else? Power over a specific group in the population - which is black people or anyone who favour's black people, at least in terms of race :crackup:

Enlighten me pls :crazy:

Ok either your not an American, or you retarded.

Checks and balances. The normal division of branches is into a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary.

The president is an example of the executive branch. On an individual level, executives have more power, but the legislative branch has far greater power as a group, but not much on an individual scale.

Look at it as proportions.

Your welcome for the education.

 

[Syrio]

Its not even that complex Syrio.

Any man who is emotionally ruled by a woman is a faggot. It doesn't matter if he is a Burger King burger flipper, Jay-Z (who is also a beta fag) or the President.

Obama being liberal vs. conservative doesn't matter. Many men from both parties are huge p*ssies with no balls at all who let women dominate them.

I don't disagree with what you're saying. I mean, I think the way you phrase it is misleading but I understand your point and I agree with it. However, nobody here has enough information at all to say that Obama is "emotionally ruled" by his wife. You can't watch someone speak on television and observe their body language and then make definitive deep assumptions about them as a person. MAYBE he is "emotionally ruled" by Michelle and MAYBE he isn't - none of us have any way of knowing and none of us have any information that would even sway us slightly to either side. Jumping to conclusions based on the way he phrases a speech or answers a question that he most likely prepared for ahead of time suggests absolutely nothing about his "alphaness" or "betaness".

I'll make a super simple and logical analogy - trying to figure out how "alpha" or "beta" Obama is, based on the limited knowledge of him that we all have, is like trying to solve this equation: A = B^5000 - 7 where A is how "alpha" Obama is. Solve for A. B represents the "alphaness" of his behavior in real life outside of his public appearances. You don't get that value because YOU DON'T FVCKING KNOW IT. You get to subtract 7 though because apparently his body language and behavior on television suggests he is beta (according to people here, not the most reliable source). Those of you who aren't retarded should be able to figure out what I'm saying with this analogy. Those of you who can't don't deserve an explanation.

Clearly, she is. Her faux outrage easily betrays her gender. Men (at least straight ones) rarely write like that.

First of all, calling someone a girl is not an insult. Second of all, you are having some trouble understanding what certain writing styles indicate. My writing style does not suggest that I'm a woman - if anything, it clearly suggests the opposite. Go look at my past posts if you want, but you really shouldn't need to. I know the average intellect of people on this forum is very, very low, but someone like you should still be able to muster up enough brain power to see that my writing style actually suggests the opposite of what you think.

 

[PlayHer Man]

I don't disagree with what you're saying. I mean, I think the way you phrase it is misleading but I understand your point and I agree with it. However, nobody here has enough information at all to say that Obama is "emotionally ruled" by his wife. You can't watch someone speak on television and observe their body language and then make definitive deep assumptions about them as a person. MAYBE he is "emotionally ruled" by Michelle and MAYBE he isn't - none of us have any way of knowing and none of us have any information that would even sway us slightly to either side. Jumping to conclusions based on the way he phrases a speech or answers a question that he most likely prepared for ahead of time suggests absolutely nothing about his "alphaness" or "betaness".

I'll make a super simple and logical analogy - trying to figure out how "alpha" or "beta" Obama is, based on the limited knowledge of him that we all have, is like trying to solve this equation: A = B^5000 - 7 where A is how "alpha" Obama is. Solve for A. B represents the "alphaness" of his behavior in real life outside of his public appearances. You don't get that value because YOU DON'T FVCKING KNOW IT. You get to subtract 7 though because apparently his body language and behavior on television suggests he is beta (according to people here, not the most reliable source). Those of you who aren't retarded should be able to figure out what I'm saying with this analogy. Those of you who can't don't deserve an explanation.

Don't be ridiculous. The fact that he is married alone increases the likelihood he is beta by 90%. Few men marry women for non-emotional reasons.. thus suggesting he is emotionally ruled by a woman (or was at one point).

Then you add his pro-women, pro-faggot politics and the answer is clear as day = Beta fag.

Like I said.. its not that complex. And this is why people here think you're a woman. Your long-winded, over-analysis of simple and obvious concepts suggests you bleed every month. :yes:

 

[Syrio]

Don't be ridiculous. The fact that he is married alone increases the likelihood he is beta by 90%. Few men marry women for non-emotional reasons.. thus suggesting he is emotionally ruled by a woman (or was at one point).

Then you add his pro-women, pro-faggot politics and the answer is clear as day = Beta fag.

Like I said.. its not that complex. And this is why people here think you're a woman. Your long-winded, over-analysis of simple and obvious concepts suggests you bleed every month. :yes:

Marriage does not make you less alpha. I just did like 2 minutes of research and found that the technical definition of an "alpha" organism is the one with the highest rank within a certain society. So technically, regardless of how Obama behaves around women, he is the most Alpha person in the country because he literally is the highest ranking member of society. This has nothing to do with marriage.

I don't really understand why you and other people here look down upon marriage so much. Honestly, it's beneficial. In fact, any person who doesn't get married is "inferior" in the sense that they are drastically lowering their chances of successful survival and reproduction. I definitely plan on getting married and having children and that does not make me beta - if anything, it makes me superior to people who don't want this (people who will be removed from the gene pool).

His politics don't make him a "beta fag"... you just disagree with them.

And as far as it being "not that complex"... I'm not over-complicating anything. You and many other people on this forum oversimplify things and overgeneralize concepts (particularly alpha/beta). Things in life are rarely as simple as they seem. I hope that eventually you understand that.

And lastly this view that my short and simple logical arguments (which you referred to as "long-winded, over-analysis of simple and obvious concepts") are womanly is just silly. You guys seem like you are saying that only women write the way I am writing (intelligently, coherently, and logically). Honestly what you are really saying is that you think women are superior writers to men and you don't even recognize it - you just dismiss intelligent arguments as over-analysis.

 

[MaddXMan]

So knowing that when you die, your surname dies with you - because you never fathered a child to carry on - is not alpha??? In a sense this is like the gay community - they can't have children either and comtemptously refer to those who can/straight people as "breeders."

 

[instantnoodles]

Ok either your not an American, or you retarded.

Checks and balances. The normal division of branches is into a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary.

The president is an example of the executive branch. On an individual level, executives have more power, but the legislative branch has far greater power as a group, but not much on an individual scale.

Look at it as proportions.

Your welcome for the education.

I'm speaking of his influence :yes:

It was sarcastic

 

[Bokanovsky]

Did Barack rally millions of voters? Or did the leftist media machine rally millions of voters on his behalf?

Exactly. Obama is nothing more than a puppet, elevated from obscurity by the special interests that now own him. No different from the old custom of putting a weak/beta king on the throne so that the barons could run the show behind the scenes. He was hand picket for the job, put in front of a teleprompter and proclaimed as the next messiah by the media. I mean, Obomber even got the Nobel Peace Prize...for doing jack sh*t to promote peace!

 

[( . )( . )]

Like it or not, if we were all in a room and President Obama walked in, he'd be the Alpha. He's got the Army. You don't.

Now on a desert island or lost in the woods? Who knows. And who cares.

What's to say he wouldn't fidget nervously and look down like he does when he's around Putin?

Sure, through successful cathedral indoctrination his image has cornered every braindead Westernised chick because free birth control,single mother loans and he just looked really cool when he was dancing with Ellen teehee.

In a room full of men? Be honest, have you ever seen a true leftoid dominate a room? It's no secret now modern day leftism is an ideology based on victimhood, political correctness and redistributing wealth from the successful to the government and a trickle to the dregs. How the fvck is it even possible for a man with that mentality to dominate a room? I've never seen it. To be fair I don't always know the political leanings of every man in a room but 10 times out 10 every libtard I have met will be meek and socially unaware.

It doesn't exactly take a genius IQ figuring out why every sheltered single mother raised herb who joins the manosphere leans left and soon after a few lays/social experience and life lessons almost always turns right. Sure you'll get the odd baby boomer who still thinks of the left from yesteryear and the gaylans but a part from that it's not likely.

Also if this is true (which it more than likely is), couldn't we just game him until he DDB's us?

 

[Syrio]

So knowing that when you die, your surname dies with you - because you never fathered a child to carry on - is not alpha??? In a sense this is like the gay community - they can't have children either and comtemptously refer to those who can/straight people as "breeders."

It's much more about passing on your genetics than your surname, though to be honest I care about both myself. And I don't know if I would say that not doing this is not "alpha" but I would say that failure to reproduce makes you, by definition, inferior. People talk here a lot about "ugly truths", like the belief that women are inferior to men, need to be treated like dirt, etc... well here is one more: the only reason we exist is to survive and reproduce, so if you don't do that, you have failed. Marriage (obviously) is a large part of this.

 

[lgbs2004]

Just looking at Obama's face you can see hi's a beta. On the other hand look at Putin or at Berlusconi's face, you can see both of them are alpha males. In the meantime here in Brazil we have a woman as president, god save us all lol!

 

[( . )( . )]

I'm not disagreeing with your stance in this thread but this a non sequitur.

Pandering to this demographic is what gets you elected and that isn't necessarily beta.

Power by any means necessary.

In fact "alphas" have been throwing other men under the bus for centuries.

Fair enough. On the flip side though lets not forget Putin recently told the faggots and lezzbobo's to take their bullhorns away from the streets and schools and fvck off back to the bedroom. He also appears to be pushing for the return of Christian morality and the nuclear family archetype, and he's more popular than ever. Inversely Obummer still hasn't changed "pandering to this demographic" since he's been in office. He's still licking the ass of our version of puzzy riot.

 

[PlayHer Man]

Marriage does not make you less alpha. I just did like 2 minutes of research and found that the technical definition of an "alpha" organism is the one with the highest rank within a certain society. So technically, regardless of how Obama behaves around women, he is the most Alpha person in the country because he literally is the highest ranking member of society. This has nothing to do with marriage.

I don't really understand why you and other people here look down upon marriage so much. Honestly, it's beneficial. In fact, any person who doesn't get married is "inferior" in the sense that they are drastically lowering their chances of successful survival and reproduction. I definitely plan on getting married and having children and that does not make me beta - if anything, it makes me superior to people who don't want this (people who will be removed from the gene pool).

His politics don't make him a "beta fag"... you just disagree with them.

And as far as it being "not that complex"... I'm not over-complicating anything. You and many other people on this forum oversimplify things and overgeneralize concepts (particularly alpha/beta). Things in life are rarely as simple as they seem. I hope that eventually you understand that.

And lastly this view that my short and simple logical arguments (which you referred to as "long-winded, over-analysis of simple and obvious concepts") are womanly is just silly. You guys seem like you are saying that only women write the way I am writing (intelligently, coherently, and logically). Honestly what you are really saying is that you think women are superior writers to men and you don't even recognize it - you just dismiss intelligent arguments as over-analysis.

You don't have to get married to reproduce OR survive you moron. :crackup:

Marriage was created by society and doesn't exist in nature. There is nothing "superior" about a person who gets married.. especially a man.

And yes.. marriage... as it exists today.. is a highly beta move. The word "alpha" means highest ranking in terms of being sexually attractive to the opposite sex. The man who has the most easy access to attractive females is alpha. If Obama started sport f*cking women left and right he would lose all his power pretty fast. So how much power does he really have then? He isn't even free to f*ck as many women has he wants. Bradly Cooper has access to more hot babes than Obama. If Obama even touches another woman.. he loses his alpha power. So is he really alpha? NOPE.

 

[Syrio]

You don't have to get married to reproduce OR survive you moron. :crackup:

Marriage was created by society and doesn't exist in nature. There is nothing "superior" about a person who gets married.. especially a man.

And yes.. marriage... as it exists today.. is a highly beta move. The word "alpha" means highest ranking in terms of being sexually attractive to the opposite sex. The man who has the most easy access to attractive females is alpha. If Obama started sport f*cking women left and right he would lose all his power pretty fast. So how much power does he really have then? He isn't even free to f*ck as many women has he wants. Bradly Cooper has access to more hot babes than Obama. If Obama even touches another woman.. he loses his alpha power. So is he really alpha? NOPE.

You don't know what alpha means. Here, please enlighten yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_(ethology)

there, now you have the objectively correct definition of an alpha, and you can see that it is not strictly about fvcking women. "In social animals, the alpha is the individual in the community with the highest rank." And YES, we (humans) ARE social animals.

Yes, marriage was created by society. However, the basic concept behind it was not. The basic concept behind it (sticking with a single mate and helping them raise a child) is natural and occurs in many species (obviously including humans). Yes, you can reproduce without getting married or sticking with the woman, but your chances of successfully reproducing lower drastically when you're not there and involved in helping protect/raise the child.

Also are you really trying to question how much power Obama has based on the fact that he would lose his job if he cheated on his wife and it became publicly known? This is the case for basically all politics... if Bradly Cooper were president - or anybody else for that matter - they would be in the same situation. You may argue that if they were single, they would be able to fvck as many women as they want even if they were president. I would say that, one: this is definitely false, and two: I don't think a non-married candidate would ever make it past the primaries let alone become president.

 

[PlayHer Man]

You don't know what alpha means. Here, please enlighten yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_(ethology)

there, now you have the objectively correct definition of an alpha, and you can see that it is not strictly about fvcking women. "In social animals, the alpha is the individual in the community with the highest rank." And YES, we (humans) ARE social animals.

In terms of SoSuave which is a website that is mostly about f*cking women.. the term "alpha" is mostly about f*cking women. That is what we talk about here silly. :crazy:

Yes, marriage was created by society. However, the basic concept behind it was not. The basic concept behind it (sticking with a single mate and helping them raise a child) is natural and occurs in many species (obviously including humans). Yes, you can reproduce without getting married or sticking with the woman, but your chances of successfully reproducing lower drastically when you're not there and involved in helping protect/raise the child.

Bullsh!t. Many men spread there seed and have kids by many different mothers. And those kids survive.

Moron. :crackup:

Also are you really trying to question how much power Obama has based on the fact that he would lose his job if he cheated on his wife and it became publicly known? This is the case for basically all politics... if Bradly Cooper were president - or anybody else for that matter - they would be in the same situation. You may argue that if they were single, they would be able to fvck as many women as they want even if they were president. I would say that, one: this is definitely false, and two: I don't think a non-married candidate would ever make it past the primaries let alone become president.

But Bradly Cooper is not President. And if a man has less freedom to live as he pleases as President than he does as a rich man.. then your average rich man is far more Alpha than ANY man in political office. Politicians are puppets for the rich. Everyone knows this (but you).

A puppet can never be alpha.

You're right about the first part. Of course they'll survive. They're eating. But are they really (emotionally) healthy? Emotional health is one determinant of overall health. Something to think about I guess.

Yeah.. no one said raising "emotionally healthy kids" makes you alpha. Lots of betas have great families and great kids.

We are not talking about what is good for kids or society.. or what is right or wrong... we are talking about what makes a man "alpha" vs. "beta".

v
v
v

 

[instantnoodles]

Bullsh!t. Many men spread there seed and have kids by many different mothers. And those kids survive.

Moron. :crackup:


.

You're right about the first part. Of course they'll survive. They're eating. But are they really (emotionally) healthy? Emotional health is one determinant of overall health. Something to think about I guess.

 

[instantnoodles]

Yeah.. no one said raising "emotionally healthy kids" makes you alpha. Lots of betas have great families and great kids.

We are not talking about what is good for kids or society.. or what is right or wrong... we are talking about what makes a man "alpha" vs. "beta".

v
v
v

Right. Well even then, an alpha in a FAMILY unit can still do this ^_^

 

[( . )( . )]

And if that fails and you still want to have your protests then you've got the KGB to answer to.

A roughhousing in a cell to appease the majority is much more noble(and masculine way I might add) than hordes of squawking PC police shouting "HATE SPEECH" and our livelyhoods on the line for speaking the meany words to appease the minority. One has the well being of a smooth running civilization in it's interest, the other doesn't. Pandering to jilted faggots wanting to spread their deviancy beyond the bedroom or glorifying irresponsible single mothers wanting the state to pick up their tab or angry affirmative actioned fem-****s expecting top jobs with half the input does not make for a healthy society.

 

[VikingKing]

Right. Well even then, an alpha in a FAMILY unit can still do this ^_^

shut up noodles, your a vagina. nobody cares.

 

[instantnoodles]

shut up noodles, your a vagina. nobody cares.

Look at me, i'm noobolgy I have nothing else to say, no other ideas to contribute to the discussion so now I will insult , taking out my failures on them :crackup:

 

[collosuss]

So what is you all real problem with Obama??? I think I know why... you all nuts just not big enough to say what's REALLY on your mind. The only worst than a beta male is a COWARD...