Where's the counter argument to what I said? Have any? or do you simply use lame politically partisan buzz words?piranha45 said:
We all know this basic crap already. It's basic human decency. We have moved on to asking better, and deeper, questions about this situation. We're not talking right and wrong, we are/were having a discussion.Jaylan said:
I think sometimes, on SoSuave, some guys want to promote responding to our sexual desires as being manly. But you have to have some sort of filter on them, you have to run them through your intellect, that's what makes us human. It's wrong to follow our every sexual impulse just because it's "natural". You can't just get up and bang some chick on the table in some business meeting just because the urge strikes you.speed dawg said:
Maybe it has to do with our culture. In some cultures, a 12 year old girl has reached adulthood, and some 30 year old dude might take her for a bride. In our culture, women are expected to make decisions for themselves, and in their early teens they are still dependent on their parents. So maybe that's the difference.speed dawg said:
Its right. All of it is right. After all, might makes right!Jaylan said:
Part of the reason the sexual marketplace is where it is, is because many guys have no impulse control, and thus have lower standards as well. Ive been guilty of it before...but I try to be better. I do definitely have lines I dont cross though.zekko said:
Alright then, Ill remember the next time I see you complain and try to swing a conversation into partisan buzzword commentary.piranha45 said:
That is true, we do not need "long drawn out conversations" to prove or disprove the allegations against Jared or anyone. What we do need are "systematic and objective fact finding investigations". As someone who works in law enforcement and who has done computer forensics on child porn cases, I do applaud Jared for making the decision to plead guilty on his own. Computer forensics at the legal/court level is a timely process even on the 'easy' cases. I.T. people and law enforcement people do not do it the same because there is so much documentation and rules to follow on a law enforcement case that I.T. cases are not necessarily bound to do. Jared could have had law enforcement spend dozens of hours doing a deep investigation when he knew he was already busted. Jared was certainly entitled to said investigation and had every right to say "prove it". But he obviously knew that the evidence would not speak in his favor.Jaylan said:The might of American law enforcement says we don't need long drawn out conversations about why Jared and his pedophile friend do what they do. Just toss em in jail and let them enjoy all the footlongs and mayonnaise they can handle.
And in prison we know how much might makes right ey? Enjoy the footlongs and extra mayo Jared
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
This is a fairly minor point, but if I recall that movie correctly, he pulls back when she reveals that she is a virgin. Before that, she had done some big talking, and he was okay with banging her when he thought she was a bit of a sleazy girl. It wasn't that she was a teenager that stopped him, it was that she was a virgin. He realized she still had an innocence that he didn't want to take.samspade said:
Supposedly there was some text message form Jared that said "the younger the better".. Hard to know if said text message is fact or fiction. I believe 17 is legal in Indiana where Jared is from but not sure about NYC where he traveled to..
