Agreed but how often do these females actually think of the consequences? Not very often.
I don't think women think of the consequences very often. Female promiscuity rates have been increasing since the 1970s. Females have also been experiencing more mental health issues in recent times at times. It's likely that the two occurrences are related to each other.
I could have been a serial killer for all this chick knows, yet she was happy and willing to rock over to my place with bottle of wine in hand.
That's unsound thinking on her part.
It seems like women are more willing to take that risk rather than to go out to a bar alone and meet men. In bars/nightlife venues, women are almost always in groups of 2, 3, or more.
During the worst of the pandemic in 2020-early 2022, there were stories emerging of women going straight to a man's home for a date/sex rather than risk a public meeting venue. The pandemic might have loosened the stigma around doing that, a stigma that was common from the 1990s-2010s.
I suppose this loneliness epidemic that we have in the Western world, to some degree forces females to make irrational decisions, they normally wouldn't make.
Lack of community, meaningful friendships, traditional family structure etc.
It's either another night of loneliness at home on NYE.. Or forget the consequences, and have someone to spend time with for the night.
And yes agreed, it's used to be a night out at the bars on NYE, but that required time, money, effort, social skills.
These days, a swipe to the right, 10 minutes conversation, and the deal is done.
Women are more social than men, but even they start to lack community and meaningful friendships in a lot of cases after age 30. Unattached women 30+ often have friends in LTRs, marriages, and marriages with children. These 30+ women lack options with friends and are willing to go on first dates with unknown men in time slots they wouldn't have considered giving up to a new man in their peak years (Fri/Sat nights, holiday/holiday adjacent time).
The conventional wisdom for a time was that first dates (especially ones arranged via tech) were meant for off nights like ordinary Tuesday-Wednesday nights.
Swiping and texting while sitting at home to get laid is easier than going out to a bar and meeting people like it was done in the 1970s-2000s.
Since you struck out twice using Roosh's strategy, I'd say that speaks volumes as to how seriously Roosh's New Years theory deserves to be taken.
Roosh mentioned in that article that he had night of January 1 lays from efforts in 2010 and 2011.
In 2010, January 1 was on a Friday night. In 2011, January 1 was a Saturday night. That likely helped him out a bit. He also mentioned having a wingman in 2011.
Roosh thought it could work any year in a bigger city. Bigger cities often have active nightlife venues on every night of the week.
In the first year I tried it out, January 1 fell on a random weeknight that year. I also tried it out that year with no wingman because none of my friends that year had interest in going out on the night of January 1. Almost all of them had spent all their energy going out on December 31 (New Year's Eve) that year. I remember being out alone, no wingman, finding few approach targets and thinking it was generally a lousy time. It was a tremendous disappointment.
It could be argued that I had a problem with venue selection that time. I was out on Dallas' biggest nightlife venue street at the time when I tried it the first time. I think venue selection was the least of my problems that night.
I think having no wingman and January 1 falling on a random weeknight that year were the bigger problems.
The second time I tried it was also a weeknight January 1 with no wingman either.
Having a wingman helps a lot in bar approaching. Guys with fewer wingman options who approach solo are generally better off doing daygame where women are isolated from their friends. That's even true with daygame having its own set of problems (untarget audience and earbuds in certain venues).