Is it really cheating?

Vulpine

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
134
Age
49
Location
The Castle Fox
dakota said:
Hello, we are just now getting a good grasp on identifying genes and their implications yet somehow these cavemen that at best we can hypothetically construct their lives... were aware of good and bad genes? what construed good and bad anyhow back then?
Modern Me:

I'm 6' and very muscular.

"Caveman" Me:

I'm 6' and very muscular.

I would say that cavemen could recognize genes and DNA.

Modern Me:

I have good eyesight, good coordination, and good stamina: I am a good hunter.

"Caveman" Me:

I have good eyesight, good coordination, and good stamina: I am a good hunter.

:confused:
I guess that I don't understand what your issue is.
 

Phyzzle

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
1,967
Reaction score
35
Now that being said, let's get back to the original question posed:

Is it really cheating?
From the way "cheating" is used in the English language, yes.

If you want to redefine words (Cheating means getting caught. Cheating means anal sex on prime numbered days.), then you can define cheating however the Hell you want.

In that case, is it cheating? Well, yes or no, whatever the Hell you want.

But since we're speaking English here, not pig latin, or Speed Dawgenese, it's definietely cheating.
 

Vulpine

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
134
Age
49
Location
The Castle Fox
You guys and your definitions. Ok, Webster...

Let's speak some English then.

Cheat:
1. To violate rules in order to gain advantage from a situation.
2. To be unfaithful to one's spouse or partner.


If we determined that 1.) there were no rules to violate, and 2.) one can have sex with many partners and still remain faithful to all of them, then what would you call it? You certainly can't call it "cheating" because that term doesn't accurately describe the situation.

Oh, now I suppose you want to define "faithful"...

Adjective

faithful
1.) loyal; adhering firmly to person or cause
2.) having faith
3.) reliable; worthy of trust
4.) consistent with reality


Noun

faithful
1.) The practicing members of a religion or followers of a cause


Ok, you'll want to dwell on #3, huh? "worthy of trust"? Well, to dwell on that we need to define "trust"....

Adjective
trust
1.) Held in trust; as, trust property; trustmoney.

Noun
trust
1.) An equitable right or interest in property distinct from the legal ownership thereof; a use (as it existed before the Statute of Uses); also, a property interest held by one person for the benefit of another. Trusts are active, or special, express, implied, constructive, etc. In a {passive trust} the trustee simply has title to the trust property, while its control and management are in the beneficiary.
2.) A business organization or combination consisting of a number of firms or corporations operating, and often united, under an agreement creating a trust (in sense 1), esp. one formed mainly for the purpose of regulating the supply and price of commodities, etc.; often, opprobriously, a combination formed for the purpose of controlling or monopolizing a trade, industry, or business, by doing acts in restraint or trade; as, a sugar trust. A trust may take the form of a corporation or of a body of persons or corporations acting together by mutual arrangement, as under a contract or a so-called gentlemen's agreement. When it consists of corporations it may be effected by putting a majority of their stock either in the hands of a board of trustees (whence the name trust for the combination) or by transferring a majority to a holding company. The advantages of a trust are partly due to the economies made possible in carrying on a large business, as well as the doing away with competition. In the United States severe statutes against trusts have been passed by the Federal government and in many States, with elaborate statutory definitions.
3.) Assured resting of the mind on the integrity, veracity, justice, friendship, or other sound principle, of another person; confidence; reliance.
4.) Credit given; especially, delivery of property or merchandise in reliance upon future payment; exchange without immediate receipt of an equivalent; as, to sell or buy goods on trust.
5.) Assured anticipation; dependence upon something future or contingent, as if present or actual; hope; belief.
6.) That which is committed or intrusted to one; something received in confidence; charge; deposit.
7.) The condition or obligation of one to whom anything is confided; responsible charge or office.
8.) (law) An estate devised or granted in confidence that the devisee or grantee shall convey it, or dispose of the profits, at the will, or for the benefit, of another; an estate held for the use of another; a confidence respecting property reposed in one person, who is termed the trustee, for the benefit of another, who is called the cestui que trust.
9.) An organization formed mainly for the purpose of regulating the supply and price of commodities, etc.; as, a sugar trust.


So, uh... #3 smells pretty good... no wait, let's use #5. Oh jeez, I think #7 is the best one for this situation. No, because we'd have to clarify "confide" and what exactly is confided. Um, let's see, we can't use #5 because of "present or actual": actual means actual, not assumed. Well, see, and even in #3 they went and used the term "assured". If someone's trust was based on something they assumed or perceived (mistakenly) and not an assurance, then by definition, what they had wasn't trust.

So, that defies the definition of #3 for "faithful". And by doing so, defies the definition #2 for "cheat". All you have left is defiinition #1 for cheat...

Shall we define "violate", "rules", and "advantage"?

azanon said:
Call it what you want, but why should I impose these additional standards arbitrarily upon myself just to see if i can still pull off "making her/them stay". Why make something unnecessarily hard? I dont pick up multiple chicks to impress someone. I pick them up because I want them, and no other reason. Thus, it is pretty illogical to make something unnecessarily hard upon myself.

If you have rules, and i dont, then i'm more powerful than you, not less powerful. Name a rule of yours, and you've just potentially named something i can do that you cant/wont.
^^^that is some beautiful stuff there!

:cheer:
 

RedPill

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 13, 2005
Messages
794
Reaction score
50
Location
Midwest America
How to tell her you're not exclusive:

:rock: "Baby, by the power vested in me, I now pronounce you one of my plates."

Her: "Huh? I don't get it." :confused:

You: "Oh, that means I can get with other chicks if I want to. We're not exclusive." :)
 

GirlCrazy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Messages
658
Reaction score
1
Age
58
Location
Spokane, WA
It depends on what your definition of the word "is" is.
 

Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Phyzzle

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 19, 2006
Messages
1,967
Reaction score
35
You missed one:

Faithful: Engaging in sex only with one's spouse or only with one's partner in a sexual relationship.
(Answers.com)

2.) one can have sex with many partners and still remain faithful to all of them, then what would you call it?
I would call it "the art of seducing a four-sided triangle".

That is, you have to change the definition of English words to pull it off. But hey, I'm not gonna go out of my way to stop you.
 

Francisco d'Anconia

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
15,502
Reaction score
63
Location
Galt's Gulch
GirlCrazy said:
It depends on what your definition of the word "is" is.
Oh you did not go there! :woo:
 

Latinoman

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
4,031
Reaction score
57
I don't care about the cheating morality of the discussion.

But let's be honest:

If you are in a committed relationship and you sleep around...then you are cheating. No need to rationalize that. Is that wrong? Maybe...maybe not. I don't care. All I know is that is cheating.

If you are married...and you sleep with somebody other than your wife...then you are committing adultery (even if she knows and encourages you to do it). Adultery is adultery. No need to sugar coat it or find technicalities.

What I find VERY bizarre is a man considering the idea of his woman sleeping with another man to "recharge things". No offense, but if you cannot keep that woman "recharged" or "interested" solely on you...then you are doing something very wrong. In fact, you are not the appropriate partner for that particular woman. All that said...you can feel free and send her my way! (kidding).

For the same token...men have something called testosterene. And it is men's nature to have several women...until society viewed that as "wrong". All said, what makes a man great is his ability to self control or his ability of avoiding hurting those that love him.
 

Create self-fulfilling prophecies. Always assume the positive. Assume she likes you. Assume she wants to talk to you. Assume she wants to go out with you. When you think positive, positive things happen.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Top