Is divorce really as big of a risk as the statistics say?

[itouchyou]

Why do you think so many celebrities got fleeced in their divorces? Were they simply too naïve to not have a prenup?

 

[SW15]

With that said, I would be seeking divorce or at least checking out if I were denied sex in my marriage. I don’t know why men tolerate that.

I don't know why men tolerate that either. It's common in marriages for men to try to initiate sex and rarely get sex from their wives.

This is definitely happening when the relationship is 5+ years long.

Am I wrong in thinking you have conveyed goodness is mostly from sex front and center even though you wrote item 3?

Sex is most important until the man's testosterone drops enough that he is less interested in sex.

If all relationships truly should end after five years, children would be utter fooking basketcases from parents going through one relationship after the other? How would people even parent at all!

Relationships tend to enter a decay phase after the 5 year anniversary (if they manage to even last to 5 years).

There are some relationships that can withstand some amount of decay after 5 years. It's less common but it happens.

It's quite common for relationships to last a long time in the decay/zombie phase. Plenty of couples are still staying together for the sake of the children or based on inertia from the oppressive mortgage and other trappings of married life.

There are some parents that do some amount of relationship jumping.

 

[The_Sea_Wolf]

This sounds great, but why would any woman agree to give you all the leverage? Presumably that's what your post sounds like.

Because you are going to pay for her needs up front, you are going to financially support her.

That is your end of the contract.

 

[zekko]

I don't think you can eliminate the risk, or even mitigate it beyond a certain point. I mean, certain behaviors will probably almost ensure you get divorced, but beyond that I think the roll of the dice is just part of the deal.

I think the only solution is to be so freaking wealthy that even if you lost half your money you'd still be able to laugh all the way to the bank. Like if you were a billionaire, for instance. But it's rare for someone that wealthy to lose half.

 

[Bible_Belt]

Child support obligations are not a valid part of a prenuptial agreement and that's in every state. Anyone telling you that there is a loophole via prenup is some YouTube jackass and not an actual lawyer. In some states, the law will say child support may be waived in a prenup, but that is only if the prenup provides for more generous child support than the courts would order. If making a woman sign a paper got you out of child support, every guy would be doing it.

 

[itouchyou]

Child support obligations are not a valid part of a prenuptial agreement and that's in every state. Anyone telling you that there is a loophole via prenup is some YouTube jackass and not an actual lawyer. In some states, the law will say child support may be waived in a prenup, but that is only if the prenup provides for more generous child support than the courts would order. If making a woman sign a paper got you out of child support, every guy would be doing it.

I get the child support argument, I wouldn't fight that in court. What I'm most worried about is asset division.. I've heard stories of women getting pretty much everything and leaving the man close to homeless.

 

[DJ Novice]

As @SW15 notes the passage of time is the biggest relationship killer.

In my case the single woman I met 20 years ago was not the same 20 years later after having and raising 2 children plus menopause and all the other stressors (mortgage etc.) that a marriage brings. People change over time, attraction fades, resentment sets in over concessions made (particularly over sex) or personality traits that were initially tolerable but are now annoying and different things may become important to each party.

I think staleness/boredom and just being with the same person for so long can’t be overlooked. It’s amazing how your sex drive and desire increases when you date someone much younger and attractive than your ex wife who actually appreciates you. The novelty of someone new is a big factor.

I think divorce is often the price that is paid for being married and raising children but having kids myself the only thing I regret is not having a prenup in place (I did ok as part of the divorce settlement but could have done better).

 

[itouchyou]

I've been looking at youtube for some general consensus on prenups and it seems surprisingly that most people, some even women, aren't opposed to the idea.

I think if it is presented from the man to the woman in a loving way such that the reasoning is delicately provided, any woman with pure intentions would be ok with it.

Brings me some relief, unless you guys disagree?

 

[Bible_Belt]

I've been looking at youtube for some general consensus on prenups and it seems surprisingly that most people, some even women, aren't opposed to the idea.

I think if it is presented from the man to the woman in a loving way such that the reasoning is delicately provided, any woman with pure intentions would be ok with it.

Brings me some relief, unless you guys disagree?

The agreement needs to be drafted with the idea that someday you might be in front of a judge trying to convince them that it is fair so they won't toss it. They like independent legal advice, ie both sides have a different lawyer to consult over the prenup before signing it. And if you are a high wage earner for a stay at home spouse, it is better to provide reasonable and temporary alimony obligations in the prenup than to let a judge decide that later.

 

[BPH]

It's not just the greater than 50% divorce rate, it's also how many of those remaining marriages are happy. Marriage has rather slim odds for long-term happiness. Consider getting a prenup, so you don't have a 50% chance to lose 50% of your assets.

If you're interested in the intersection between red pill and divorce, maybe you should watch Rollo Tomassi ("The Rational Male") interviewing divorce lawyer James Sexton.

This guy's interview with Soft White Underbelly was fantastic...

As for the OP's question, I brought this interview up in a discussion with my cousins regarding prenups.

I have a younger cousin dating a rich guy, and at the beginning of the conversation, she didn't understand what a prenup was and stated she was for it. By the end of the conversation when she realized that a prenup meant she would NOT automatically get half of the guy's worth if the marriage ended in divorce, she changed her mind and said she would not sign one.

I think that mentality is shared by most women, and should make you think twice about making a contractual commitment.

 

[The Duke]

Fellas, there are no guarantees for anything in life. What needs to change is the expectation that marriage should last forever. Thats the biggest fallacy society keeps swallowing.

You can vet everything under the sun and still fail.

Why do we need marriage? Whats the benefit? How do you mitigate risks? Who does marriage benefit most?

Have you ever wondered why a marriage contract isn't more like a business contract? Its the only contract where one side can behave poorly and it doesn't void the contract and they still get a payout. And why not make marriage contracts that go up for renewal every 5-10yrs?

 

[Manure Spherian]

Why do we need marriage?

The primary reason for marriage WAS to establish fatherhood, which is damn important because without this establishment, women can simply run off with men’s children with no ramification. Fatherhood (not simply being a biological father or sperm donor), unlike motherhood, is imposed on women and children, whether people like the way that’s put or not.

Past that the government should not (but it does plenty) interfere with the workings of a home and family.

I think divorced should be allowed and that whoever initiates it without fault of the other spouse should have zero custody of the kids.

And no, I’m not a tradcon.

 

[pipeman84]

I've been looking at youtube for some general consensus on prenups and it seems surprisingly that most people, some even women, aren't opposed to the idea.

I think if it is presented from the man to the woman in a loving way such that the reasoning is delicately provided, any woman with pure intentions would be ok with it.

A woman could say that a guy with pure intentions wouldn't think of a prenup.

I have a younger cousin dating a rich guy, and at the beginning of the conversation, she didn't understand what a prenup was and stated she was for it. By the end of the conversation when she realized that a prenup meant she would NOT automatically get half of the guy's worth if the marriage ended in divorce, she changed her mind and said she would not sign one.

If I'm not mistaken, the woman gets half of the guy's wealth produced during the marriage. It's not like he marries with 20M of family money, he travels and plays video games for a year, making no money, then the wife divorces and gets half of that 20M. She would get half of nothing, meaning nothing.

So the prenup is basically for the rich guys who keep making money after they got married. So this is the part that I don't get: if you're rich enough to consider a prenup, then it means you're experienced in dealing with people and have knowledge of how the world works. That means you should be able to spot a gold digger after the first or second date. Even if she's an Oscar worthy actress, she can't fake it more than a couple months. If she's of poor character, why marry her and rely on a prenup to save you instead of just ditching the hoe and find a proper girl? And if you don't find one, then just don't marry, it's not like it's mandatory.

 

[Divorced w 3]

Fellas, there are no guarantees for anything in life. What needs to change is the expectation that marriage should last forever. Thats the biggest fallacy society keeps swallowing.

You can vet everything under the sun and still fail.

Why do we need marriage? Whats the benefit? How do you mitigate risks? Who does marriage benefit most?

Have you ever wondered why a marriage contract isn't more like a business contract? Its the only contract where one side can behave poorly and it doesn't void the contract and they still get a payout. And why not make marriage contracts that go up for renewal every 5-10yrs?

It used to check bad behavior until no fault divorce.

 

[Divorced w 3]

The primary reason for marriage WAS to establish fatherhood, which is damn important because without this establishment, women can simply run off with men’s children with no ramification. Fatherhood (not simply being a biological father or sperm donor), unlike motherhood, is imposed on women and children, whether people like the way that’s put or not.

Past that the government should not (but it does plenty) interfere with the workings of a home and family.

I think divorced should be allowed and that whoever initiates it without fault of the other spouse should have zero custody of the kids.

And no, I’m not a tradcon.

Marriage was invented to secure the transfer of property, millennia ago during times of war, and its social construct was developed alongside it to merge members of classes to ensure the continuance of lineage and transfer wealth.

If one’s purpose in the relationship is not to ensure the above then they have no business getting married.

It’s lost a massive amount of utility with the passage of no fault divorce. Risk in marriage now is massive.

 

[Aristippus]

To Original Poster,

Women worth your time will agree to any reasonable conditions given the right circumstances and how it is presented.

As far as marriage goes I took a carefully calculated risk when I got married and have been for over 15 years. We have a good sex life and good relationship. Nothing is perfect but there is much more good than bad in our relationship.

You have to find a woman that you're sexually compatible with to make it work. Among other things. Does she act eager for sex? Does she say "Thank you." or make comments about how much she enjoys sex with you? (These are questions you ask yourself when reviewing her behavior.)

In other areas, is she always set on having things her way or does she willing to compromise? Is she willing to work things out after an arguement or to make up quickly? Or does she act hateful for days after an arguement? Does she cook for you on a regular basis and do household chores that women are supposed to do? There are other things to look for. That's just scratching the surface.

 

[Divorced w 3]

If she was rich, why did you end up getting financially ruined?

I’ll add to this, pressure makes diamonds. I got lazy and content living off the family money. I’m a national caliber salesman now at a massive company. My commission this month will be more than a lot of guys will make this year. My side hustle brought in $150k last year. I don’t lose, it’s not in my vocabulary, it’s a disease and I am immune to it. I will fight tooth and nail for my kids. They’re the only reason I get out of bed and fvck her father if he thought he was going to get me to tap out. What I texted that man a couple months into the processing you wouldn’t even believe. I told him what his wife wanted to do and how she wanted to do it. I have many screws lose but losing ain’t one of them.

I still by no means recommend divorce and by extension ill -thought out marriage.

 

[Manure Spherian]

Marriage was invented to secure the transfer of property, millennia ago during times of war, and its social construct was developed alongside it to merge members of classes to ensure the continuance of lineage and transfer wealth.

Yes, that included.