Well, I was unbiased until I saw this:Wiesman44 said:I haven't ignored it u bum, I just haven't read this thread in a while. Check your PM.
on his website: http://www.salrachele.com/"HAPPY 2010! Less than 3 years until 12-21-2012!"
and
"EARTH CHANGES and 2012. Order Now!"
from: http://www.salrachele.com/priest.htmSal Rachele was re-ordained a priest in the Order of Melchizedek in 1991 in Sedona, Arizona. He has been a member since the time of Atlantis. The Order of Melchizedek is an intergalactic group with headquarters in the Alcyone system, as well as the Pleiades and Sirius.
http://www.atlantisquest.com/Plato.htmlAlle_Gory said:Well, I was unbiased until I saw this:
but I can prove that Atlantis never existed. It was a tool that Plato invented for argument. A story.
There is no other mention of Atlantis before Plato. How can this be? This advanced civilization existing for thousands of years and no one mentions it before Plato and no evidence is uncovered of its existence either geographical or archeological. Surely they must have left SOMETHING behind.Wiesman44 said:http://www.atlantisquest.com/Plato.html
Check out that website. Has a bunch of interesting facts regarding Atlantis, where its located, the evidence that they've uncovered so far that proves it could have existed.
You, my friend, cannot prove Atlantis never existed, nor can you prove Plato was using it as a work of fiction.
My source kicks your source.You, my friend, cannot prove Atlantis never existed, nor can you prove Plato was using it as a work of fiction.
The enduring question, now two millennia old, is whether Plato's account of Atlantis is a description of an actual civilization that sunk beneath the waves, or a tantalizing tale that rose up wholly from the depths of the Athenian philosopher's imagination. In general terms there are three possible conclusions to be made for the Atlantis legend:
the account is entirely factual and inerrant;
it is a blend of fact, fiction, and error; or
it is entirely fictional.
Most cranks and all legitimate scholars alike have jettisoned the first conclusion. Unfortunately these cranks and several scholars agree on the second possibility, but the great pitfall is that each detail of Plato's Atlantis that is cast aside so that it will fit a theory weakens the very premise of having solved the question of whether Atlantis existed. Librarian Rand Flem-Ath thinks Atlantis is really Antarctica; Swiss geoarcheologist Eberhard Zangger thinks Atlantis is Troy. But the more that Plato's dates, location, and other details are changed, the less stands to be proven about the truth of Atlantis. It becomes as ridiculous as arguing that a missing Victorian house in Hackensack, New Jersey was really a Spanish Villa in Mexico City all along, QED.
Scholars who would concede that there is any fact at all behind the Atlantis legend usually argue that Plato has only dimly recalled a Bronze cataclysm in the Aegean Sea, either on Crete or Santorini, but that his account is largely fictional. Yet all the evidence shows, I will argue, that Plato's Atlantis account is beyond a reasonable doubt entirely fictional-a utopian myth concocted to vividly illustrate Plato's political philosophy. Invoking Ray Hyman's categorical imperative of first making sure an explanation is needed before trying to explain a mystery, we can then dispense with any discussion of "explanations" or "sources" for the Atlantis legend
There are important distinctions between Homer's Troy and Plato's Atlantis: the obvious one is that the ruins of Troy have been found where Homer said they were: the proof is in the pudding. Also, the Iliad and its heroes are part of a mythic tradition that suffused Greek art and culture. Pottery shows scenes from the Trojan War and depicts heroes like Achilles, Ajax, and Odysseus. Long-standing local legends and religious myths also allude to many of the characters. Many of the places mentioned in the Iliad were recognized by Greeks of Plato's time. There is even solid evidence that Iliad (and its companion work, the Odyssey) themselves have deep roots into the past. Milman Parry's landmark work in the 1930s analyzing the structure of Homeric poetry and comparing it with oral poetry among the Serbs, demonstrates that the Iliad is essentially an oral poem woven from conventional phrases and lays handed down through generations of Greek bards. Though committed to writing, the poetry itself is a product of oral mnemonic and metric composition.
Plato's Timaeus and Critias, by contrast, are non-traditional: his dialogues are original prose compositions. Atlantis is mentioned by no one before Plato, and was never part of the broader interconnected traditions of ceramic art, poetry, literary allusions, local legends, or monumental architecture. There is no evidence to show that tales of Atlantis were handed down through generations from an age long before Plato.
There is no evidence whatsoever to indicate that Atlantis represented any real place at any time. Where the story contains descriptions or events that resemble historic happenings, it only does so to the degree that any piece of fiction relies on experiences of reality. All of the evidence points to the story being one of Plato's noble lies: useful fictions used to make a point, not to refer to the past.
Atlantis continues to captivate people's imaginations because it offers the hope that lost ideals or some untapped human potential will someday be uncovered, not the masonry blocks of a dead civilization. Scrying for crumbled roads in Bimini or poring over the outline of some terra incognita on a forged map ignore the real Atlantis, the undiscovered country of human ideals.
Wiesman44 said:There are thousands of other people with memories similar to mine..... so i guess we're all just crazy then.