Women, just like children, have a tendency to ask some pretty silly questions....
Why answer them? Why give them any importance? Why not simply ignore them while giving them an amused look?
I admittedly would get frustrated at what I labelled "dumb" questions. However, what I observed was that frustrating was coming from labelling their questions "dumb". How could she be so dumb after all, right? But there was an expectation not been met. The expectation been that the questions or mentality "shouldn't be dumb". And when there's a disparity between expected behavior and received behavior frustration can blossom. It may be just a question of semantics but the word "silly" seems to work better. There's innocence in silly. There's no expectation not been met.
Ignore silly questions.
It sometimes has the secondary effect of driving her crazy and notching up the tension...
It also prevents you form entering into her frame and jumping through her hoops, especially when it comes to silly interview type questions. Silly interview type questions are without tension and end up been a supplication frame. She'll later say there was no spark and label you boring. This self entitlement....believing you are there to amuse her, like a clown..... must be mocked.
When she's persistent (or perhaps the tension becomes too much for you to bear...) and you feel like you've got to answer? Be like a politician. Politicians answer indirectly. Or to put it a better way...a skilled politician will answer the question that he feels the interviewer should have asked him. Rather than taking the bait from the interviewer and being lead, the astute politician answers in an oblique way.
It saves time and cuts down on silliness.
Why answer them? Why give them any importance? Why not simply ignore them while giving them an amused look?
I admittedly would get frustrated at what I labelled "dumb" questions. However, what I observed was that frustrating was coming from labelling their questions "dumb". How could she be so dumb after all, right? But there was an expectation not been met. The expectation been that the questions or mentality "shouldn't be dumb". And when there's a disparity between expected behavior and received behavior frustration can blossom. It may be just a question of semantics but the word "silly" seems to work better. There's innocence in silly. There's no expectation not been met.
Ignore silly questions.
It sometimes has the secondary effect of driving her crazy and notching up the tension...
It also prevents you form entering into her frame and jumping through her hoops, especially when it comes to silly interview type questions. Silly interview type questions are without tension and end up been a supplication frame. She'll later say there was no spark and label you boring. This self entitlement....believing you are there to amuse her, like a clown..... must be mocked.
When she's persistent (or perhaps the tension becomes too much for you to bear...) and you feel like you've got to answer? Be like a politician. Politicians answer indirectly. Or to put it a better way...a skilled politician will answer the question that he feels the interviewer should have asked him. Rather than taking the bait from the interviewer and being lead, the astute politician answers in an oblique way.
It saves time and cuts down on silliness.