lol...fun stuff. I think that debates like this are what put the "laughter" in manslaughter. I don't think that it seems all to rational for 2 reasonably str8(I hope) guys to be discussing what makes guys hot. Especially sense, if this site is about anything, its not about the looks. Its your game...leave the looking good to the women...leave the manipulating to the DJ's.
That said, I will through my 2 cents into the topic (in hopes of not spamming)....
I think things can be seperated pretty nicely purely by what it is that the person is trying to accomplish. The sprinter vs. Distance runner example fit it nicely.
Theres no doubt that both guys are in shape, but one needs muscles for burst the other needs endurance for stamina...they train differently but there's no doubt about atheleticism. I don't in the least bit attempt to judge a woman's perspective of sexy I just think at the end of the day its subjective.
Look at certain guys like Usher (since he's been named) dude is ridiculously in shape and works out very hard to attain the figure he has. Is he muscular, no, is he lean VERY. He has the figure that best allows him to do what he does...girls find it hot.
Now look at a guy like Batista (WWE wrestler)..Ridiculously in shape as well and I'm sure he spends much time in the gym to attain the figure he has. Is he muscular yes, and he's lean as well. Women still find him hot. Nuff said.
Either way it goes women will date a guy if he has the necessary tools. As far as the height thing..I think that holds more substantial weight than anythign else said in this thread. Just for experimental purposes...log onto myspace and go through a bunch of profiles of single women. They all tend to have the "what i want in a mate" area at the bottom of their profile...and usually the overwhelming majority of women want a guy thats taller than they are. I'm 6-4 so this isn't a problem I normally have but I've seen women automatically give dudes the snub because they were short.
But on the other hand...thats just funny..so does it really matter?
That said, I will through my 2 cents into the topic (in hopes of not spamming)....
I think things can be seperated pretty nicely purely by what it is that the person is trying to accomplish. The sprinter vs. Distance runner example fit it nicely.
Theres no doubt that both guys are in shape, but one needs muscles for burst the other needs endurance for stamina...they train differently but there's no doubt about atheleticism. I don't in the least bit attempt to judge a woman's perspective of sexy I just think at the end of the day its subjective.
Look at certain guys like Usher (since he's been named) dude is ridiculously in shape and works out very hard to attain the figure he has. Is he muscular, no, is he lean VERY. He has the figure that best allows him to do what he does...girls find it hot.
Now look at a guy like Batista (WWE wrestler)..Ridiculously in shape as well and I'm sure he spends much time in the gym to attain the figure he has. Is he muscular yes, and he's lean as well. Women still find him hot. Nuff said.
Either way it goes women will date a guy if he has the necessary tools. As far as the height thing..I think that holds more substantial weight than anythign else said in this thread. Just for experimental purposes...log onto myspace and go through a bunch of profiles of single women. They all tend to have the "what i want in a mate" area at the bottom of their profile...and usually the overwhelming majority of women want a guy thats taller than they are. I'm 6-4 so this isn't a problem I normally have but I've seen women automatically give dudes the snub because they were short.
But on the other hand...thats just funny..so does it really matter?