"No, actually they are not. Try studying psychology. Try talking to women about what guys they have been attracted to, and don't take the first thing they answer but drill down to what they really liked. Guys are attracted probably 80% looks, and the other 20% personality and other things. However, if the girl falls below a 5 on our scale. Almost no amount of alcohol can overcome. What turns us on and off, is to a large extent visual. If she's a warpig, doesn't matter if she has the best of everything else going for her, it's just not happening. However with women, it's probably closer to 30-40% visual, and the rest is the other things I have mentioned. I have had some friends who were down right UGLY who could pull chicks, but they had an awesome attitude and were a blast to be around."
That's pure bull****. When you see a girl walk into a room, you know if you want to **** her or not, women respond the exact same way. This is from my own experience even if I haven't studied all the psycology that's available. Women are visual, they go for the visual, they are superficial too. Just by bulking I have noted extreme difference in women checking me out, the response too. This without ME doing anything so it has to be visual.
"Your masculinity is projected from your skin. Hmmm... that's interesting. So, if I walk over, hunched over, looking straight at the ground, shuffling my feet, but my skin is great, then I'm masculine? Give me a break. Being masculine/alpha whatever you want to call it has EVERYTHING to do with who you are, not what you are. Because I have a **** and balls doesn't mean that I'm ultra-masculine. If I limp-wrist when I talk, it's not going to make me masculine either. You are a man, by the way you act, the way you stand, the way you talk, the way you enter a room, the way you maintain eye contact, etc. Not with some elusive quality of "what you are" or your skin."
Masculine and alpha is not the same thing. The manliness is not found in your way of walking. If a girl who have very feminine traits would walk like that you would still probably feel a desire to **** her, even with low confidence, think tyler durdens *****. Masculinity and femininty is what we are, not what we do. If you don't agree then there are no point discussing anymore.
"I'm going to have to say that once again you're wrong, men and women are attracted in totally different ways. Believe it's true at your own risk."
Hell no they aren't, have you actually had girls saying when they are drunk... "I wanna ****?", they are as horny, they are as superficial as we are, but they hide it.
What techniques did I talk about? Being a better person is not a technique, it's a lifestyle. I'm not talking about running patterns or any of that crap. I'm talking about making yourself more attractive. Improving your body language. Looking at people more directly. Being conscious of any mannerisms that aren't attractive. Walking and moving slower. The only technique I do approve of is ****y and funny, but that's mostly because it's a blast and it does happen to work. But, once again, once you get good at it, it's not really a technique it's really about who you are. Which leads to another thought. When you first start to learn to DJ, all of these things that you learn may seem like techniques, but after a while they really become who you are. There are techniques to increase your confidence, but after your confidence is higher, is it still a technique or are you actually more confident? I think that goes for much of what is taught here. ****y and funny is a way to talk to women that increases attraction, after a while it becomes who you are.
I agree with you, it's a lifestyle. And C&F that's fun, I am just abandoning it.
Just my thoughts on the idea, I'm open to being wrong.
M