SW15
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- May 31, 2020
- Messages
- 13,941
- Reaction score
- 11,627
These days, a lot of longer term couples exist from Tinder, Hinge, Bumble, OkCupid, Plenty of Fish, and Match.its like once girls know u use the internet to find partners, they will always hold it against you in some subtle way. u will never be seen as a catch like the men from her real life, you will always be 'proving' yourself to her. the girls are also more likely to have personality issues, be lower smv etc
In these relationships, I think you're right that the woman subtly knows that she's higher value than the man. The man had to resort to an internet website or a swipe app to get her. That might be more of a thing in the older couples formed from 10-15 years ago on the older platforms than in newer relationships, but I think it's still a thing in LTRs formed 2-7 years ago on swipe apps.
Alpha males don't have to go on swipe apps to meet women BUT alphas these days have it easier on swipe apps than they might in real life. If you're a 90th percentile male or higher, you can sit at home in your underwear, swipe, and get more matches/conversations than you could even get in real life. There are certain efficiencies for the top tier from the swipe apps.the girls i met in real life from bars and day approach have been significantly hotter and higher value than any girl i have met online.
they were also higher interest, and held interest in me for longer, put more effort into chasing me, sh!t tested less, and saw me as alpha rather than a beta provider, and were more feminine.
this isnt just a random observation. its a real trend. the hotter, younger and better women have been from approaches and the worst ones have been from online
For most men on swipe apps, they are resorting to swipe apps because they aren't meeting enough women in the real world, not for the greater efficiencies.
While a top guy can bang more 5-6.5 women online than he could in real life with less effort, a guy who is in the 8-9 range who wants an actual relationship with a woman in the 8-9 range is still better off doing real life approaches.
In 2002, a lot of 7's and 7+ women weren't online. They were mostly at the bars. Non-bar approaching was a niche activity then as it is now.It was actually pretty good back in 2002 compared to today. I could more easily get dates with 7's then (who looked like their pics). Obviously I'm 20 years older but conversely, I get more IOI's walking around today (due to having game and a better vibe) than I did back then.
That being said, if I had game back then I wouldn't have resorted to online due to the low number of women using it. But it was considerably easier back then to get a 7+ woman's attention if she happened to be online dating.
In 2002, I was 19 and in college. My options were meeting women on campus or at off campus apartment parties. The off campus apartment parties resembled night game at bars specifically because of the way I did it. In many cases, private residence parties are social circle game. In college, there are random people showing up to random apartments that are known to be bigger party complexes and just socializing and doing approaches. I did more random approaching at off campus parties than random approaching in the dining hall, walking on campus, or in extracurricular activities. It would have been better if I had focused more on the non-off campus party approaching methods and done more daygame type stuff on campus. It wouldn't matter today because any romantic relationship I would have formed during college would have ceased to exist by the time I turned 25. I might have had healthier interactions though.
Why didn't you have as much game in 2002? You were already 30 then. It's good for you that doing online then was more fruitful than doing tech-assisted dating now.
In 2005, I set some dates in the DMs on MySpace and it was easier then to that than DMs now on Instagram or Twitter.
Last edited: