Homoseuxality is natural

[MindOverMatter]

haha, man, PRL is gonna rip you a new one when he finds this thread.

 

[rgeere]

I read through the article, though it isn't really saying or proving anything. It seems more like a statement of an observation that doesn't appear to understand what it is observing.

 

[PuertoRican_Lover]

Hahaha Shorty, was this a paper you wrote in third grade??

I only read the first paragraph of your so-called "paper" and it had a major error in it (can anyone point it out). I would have given you a "F" for a failing grade and Faggot and a "H" for being a Homo

Your professor is obviously a homo for him to give you an "A" for a grade!

So you are saying there is a gene that makes men put their penis in a man's @ss????

You are a FOOL to the greatest degree!!!

Homo- the unnatural order of things!!

 

[PuertoRican_Lover]

Originally posted by MindOverMatter
haha, man, PRL is gonna rip you a new one when he finds this thread.

Hahaha, I just got the gist of this joke a few minutes after I read it --- nice one bastard, I had a good laugh on a homo joke!

 

[Bling]

:crackup:

 

[Bling]

Originally posted by Joe The Homophobe
What really causes homosexuality? It is not such a widely known fact that farmers are pumping estrogen into chickens and the same goes for many other foods. Estrogen being the female hormone, testostorone the male hormone. Homosexuals have higher levels of estrogen, which should explain why they act and sound feminine. The estrogen is causing a mental inbalance whereby the male thinks like a female (since he has more estrogen than testostorone).

I don't think homosexuality is right either, but how does that explain women? Do they have a mental inbalance of testerone? If so, from where?

 

[undesputable]

im a homophobe and im not afraid to say it, actually im quite proud im such a homophobe. im also a feminisphobe, and also im quite proud to say im a feminisphobe. all feminist and homos can die go to hell today for all i care.

 

[diplomatic_lies]

If you think about it, nearly everything we do is unnatural.

Dating is unnatural. Sex outside breeding is unnatural. Computers are unnatural. So is eating most foods.

 

[Alpine]

It's well documented, homophobics have repressed homosexual tendancies. Those certain of their sexuality are unconcerned about the threat of homos because they have no interest in them.

Homophobia is very common in teenagers as they wrestle through their quest for sexuality identity.

On one level they sort of know it, on the other it is deeply repressed, a sure sign of this conflict is the expression of anger towards confrontation of these facts.

Ironically, the best way to come to terms with these feelings is to accept them. Now what this doesn't mean is you have to go out and shag blokes, but you do have to accept these feelings are a part of you.

 

[simon]

Originally posted by Joe The Homophobe
Blah blah blah. Scaremongering 101

I suggest you go and read up on those oh so harmful chemicals at http://www.cosmeticscop.com/ .

Here's a quote from that website:
"It is true that propylene glycol in 100% concentration is used as antifreeze, but—and this is a very big but—in cosmetics it is used in only the smallest amounts to keep products from melting in high heat or freezing when it is cold."

Unless you're swallowing your shampoo, there's very little chance of becoming ill from using products containing these chemicals.

Stop spreading this alarmist ****, and stop being so ****ing gullible.

Dr. Rapp's website reads like an advertisement. Citric acid is bad for you? Better stop eating oranges then. Oh no...lactic acid!! I better hope that I don't respire anaerobically!!! And...**** me...malic acid? These apples really are killing me.


Back on topic...homophobes make me laugh.

 

[Gus]

edit: NEVER-EFFING-MIND

 

[Jariel]

What consenting adults do between themselves is their business.

The only things I oppose are the in-your-face parades and the promotion of gay promiscuity as it portrays homosexuality as sleazy and devious and harms their cause. For the same reason, I hate gangsta rap, as it hinders the cause of racial rights and affirms stereotypes.

I have gay friends, some of who are in really stable and loving relationships, and are a pleasure to be around.

Who cares if it's natural or not. I mean if everything had to be natural in order to be accepted, we'd all still be living in caves, hunting wild animals.

 

[undesputable]

Originally posted by Alpine
It's well documented, homophobics have repressed homosexual tendancies. Those certain of their sexuality are unconcerned about the threat of homos because they have no interest in them.

Homophobia is very common in teenagers as they wrestle through their quest for sexuality identity.

On one level they sort of know it, on the other it is deeply repressed, a sure sign of this conflict is the expression of anger towards confrontation of these facts.

Ironically, the best way to come to terms with these feelings is to accept them. Now what this doesn't mean is you have to go out and shag blokes, but you do have to accept these feelings are a part of you.

no....see thats all bull ****. those are just theories that phsycologists make so we wouldnt have anything against gays. Gays are know for:

1.HAVING SEX IN THE BUTTHOLE.
2.HAVING SEX WITH MANY MANY PARTNERS. Promiscuity to the max
3. As a result of having butt sex and having it with so many partners they start epidemics of many STDS, the most serious being Aids. It is more likly to contract Aids from the butt hole than through normal vaginal sex.
4. Homosexulaity goes along the lines of feminism. Women try to usurp the mens role, which they are able to if theyre gay, and men become more feminized.
5. Trying to get more homos on their side, homos go out and try to seduce straight men.

I dont know about you man, im proud to say that im quite disgusted by that behavior so i can say that im a homophobe, and no i dont have any oppressed homosexual tendencies. All those theories is just a way to get society to accept homosexuality....theyre tricking you into believeing being gay is OK.

 

[Señor Fingers]

Originally posted by ShortTimer
Quite often when I post on the internet I get the feeling that people don't understand what I'm trying to say.

Maybe you should learn to spell better, Mr. "Homoseuxality"

As far as you paper goes, I think your teacher fancies you. Better watch your back! (Unless you are into that sort of thing)

 

[Alpine]

Here's another stat for you.

Did you know one in seventeen fathers leave their families to go have gay relationships.

Now I'm not saying this, but just suppose your Dad is one of those 1 in 17. Would he stop being your Dad?

Here's another thought.

Who is the biggest threat to society, someone who murders a Gay for being gay, or a Gay who is a Doctor, Firefighter, war hero, film star that you admire etc etc?

I'd prefer a Gay friend over some angry Punk who is unsure of his sexuality anyday.

 

[undesputable]

Originally posted by Alpine


Who is the biggest threat to society, someone who murders a Gay for being gay, or a Gay who is a Doctor, Firefighter, war hero, film star that you admire etc etc?

I dont see any point to that questions, but to answer it, the biggest threat would be a gay doctor, firefighter, war hero, or film star (i wouldnt admire him cause hes gay).....

I dont know why you know so many statistics about gays or the reason gays are gays, seems like either you dont see absolutly anything wrong with being gay, or youre trying to find a good excuse to tell everybody that youre gay. People say that kids who grow up without a dad are very likley to be gay, well i grew up without a dad, i had a couple of stepdads tho...But look im straight as a ruler, I personally dont buy into that theory either. The main reason gays become gays, is bc society makes it seem like theres absolutly nothing wrong with it, that is the COOL thing to do, and tries to publish as many theories as they can to give gays an excuse. Well **** that...

 

[simon]

Originally posted by undesputable
2.HAVING SEX WITH MANY MANY PARTNERS. Promiscuity to the max

Just like countless people who frequent these boards.

Originally posted by undesputable
5. Trying to get more homos on their side, homos go out and try to seduce straight men.

Hahaha. Any 'straight' man who is seduced by an EVIL HOMO is not straight.

 

[Alpine]

Undisputable,

Look, I've never brought up a gay topic on this board, ever. You and Homophobe keep on going on about homos, not me. Maybe you two should move in together.

Although you don't realise it, I and many others here are trying to help you understand that the idea that being gay is WRONG, is just a belief.

There is tons of modern research and has been known since the beginning of man that homophobia stems from sexual insecurity, and has been fuelled by modern religous interpretations.

I'm not saying you want to brown your meat, merely that you have some unresolved questions about who you are.

As I say blokes who have no stirrings for the boys, don't really give a monkeys what they get up to. If you become open minded about what I have just written I'm sure you will end up feeling happier and ironically more of a man.

 

[Engetsu]

Originally posted by Sazuki
So when two male animals start having sex, or an entire male species start having sex after eating from a tree that induces homosexual tendencies they can keep on doing that for 10 billion years without change(they need to mate with some females now and then though). A chance mutation inside the genome is resposible for new behaviour. (Again, has never been observed.)

I would just like to correct something here. It is more likely for a mutation to occur during pregnancy, because that's the period where the few molecules of DNA and RNA are duplicating rapidly, increasing the chances of an error during transcription and a mutation at the same time. I don't think total homosexuality is caused by a mutation, since it has been observed since the Ancient Greeks, and if it was purely genetic, it would have been eliminated through natural selection, since homosexuals do not transmit their genes. It is also possible for the "homosexuality gene" to have disappeared and reappeared during another mutation, but that is veeeeery unlikely.

But all in all your reply was the most on the dot out of the whole thread. I like the way you think, but I disagree with your personal view.

Also...

Originally posted by ShortTimer
This is so hilarious: "pseudo-science" indeed. I'm sure if there was any pseudo-science in there my PhD philosophy professor would have noticed it and not given me a 97% for a grade.

Both you and Sazuki are wrong. Your article is not pseudo-science nor science, it is simply philosophy, which is a rational reflexion on anything. Basically, as long as there are arguments, you can say anything in philosophy. That's why it's completely pointless to bash the article, but rather present alternatives to it, since it is nothing more than pure philosophy, and you can't discuss the origins of philosophy.

If it was a Sociology essay, then YES I'd have been flaming your ass like Aids in Ethiopia... But I can't really say much more than what Sazuki said.

 

[Don Juanabbe]

If people want to be gay, that's there problem, just do it well the f*ck away from me.