history lessons

[joekerr31]

most male politicians are like women to me.

they flip flop to whatever suits them at the time, they dont lie but they don't tell the truth either, they are overly concerned with what everyone thinks about them and don't spend enough time developing their own substance as a human being, etc.

i do think hilary clinton will win next year. she's an ok broad. she's not your average woman - i bet if you asked her opinion on most women she'd rip in to them.

i'll give her credit, she's actually in there playing the game. unlike most women who just sit on the sidelines and b*tch about how they've been short changed in life because their husband doesn't make 10M a year.

all that said, i think all the candidates this year, including clinton, are your typical phoney politicians. Although i like Ron Paul, that guy is funny.

 

[iqqi]

i know how, but can not get the lug nuts off because i am not strong enough. there is only so much strength in my 100 lbs ... however, while trying to loosen the lug nut, i will admit to be openly angry that i could not get the thing to budge and had to resort to paying someone to do it for me.

I "resort" to using my woman powers.

I have a whole arsenal of woman powers, that I fine tune daily, and use all the time.

I F*CKING LOVE WOMAN POWERS. I said it.

Where the f*ck is the "batting eyelashes" emoticon???

 

[penkitten]

oh just one other thing...

"i am woman hear me roar" means about as much to me as

let them eat cake?

 

[ketostix]

dont you find it strange how many guys on here are so focused on needing a woman, and yet, in reality, a man doesn't really need a woman for anything other than getting laid and sharing an emotional bond?

i can tell you this much. i can cook better than a woman, i do my own wash, etc.

a woman honestly doesn't enhance my life in any other way other than if i enjoy her company and the sex i get.

but when i think of the benefits a woman gets from me? i help her think straight when she's emotionally upset. if things need lifting no problem. she gets protection when im walking with her at night. she gets the potential of me as a provider for her and children (if she plays her cards right). etc.

seems a bit lopsided to me. women must scratch their heads at how, in exchange for basically sex, they get so much in return.

Joekerr totally knocked it right out of the freaking ballpark.

When you consider a smaller portion of guys have several women occupied sexually, most men seem to be able to go a lot longer in the "desert" without women than women do without men. Add to this all the women who have their orbiters and their AFC admirers which is of some emotional benefit to the woman but only a drain or a negative to men and it's clear who's getting the raw end of the stick and who's getting athe better end of the deal.

 

[iqqi]

a woman's only protection from a man's physical strength is other men..

bull the f*ck sh*t!

Some women have a GUN.

 

[joekerr31]

Very very interesting point. Could the manipulative nature of women have something to do with the fact that they must be able to have a "safety net"?

well from a evolutionary perspective its pretty simple. here you have a caveman woman facing some pretty horrible realities around her. strong males that would capture her and maker her their sex slave or whatever. she also would have a hard time hunting compared to a man, etc.

so she would learn to manipulate male attention. heck, gorillas do this. a female will send mating singles to a number of males, who will then fight each other, and then the winner f*cks her.

women are designed and have evolved, to manipulate men through their desires. where it gets f*cked is when women pit men against men, sparking that old evolutionary response where the two men fight against each other.

you'd think we'd have evolved beyond all this, but we haven't. and until men start demanding more from women other than them simply flashing their p*ssy at them, things are never going to change.

 

[Last Man Standing]

all women secretly are angry that they are physically weaker than men. women just hate the fact that at the end of the day they can't stand up to a man face to face.

they do the best they can with it, they admire a man for it, they will harness a man's power on their behalf (kind of taming a wild horse) - but all the while they recent that while having equal intelligence to a man, they are none the less subordinate due to physical strength.

a woman's only protection from a man's physical strength is other men.

even when guns came on to the scene this didn't change anything (since most people aren't murderers at heart).

never underestimate the role simple physical strength plays in the huge difference between the genders.

I said this before - and this is the truth and is at the heart of why the feminists are motivated to "weaken" the male in other areas!!

 

[joekerr31]

bull the f*ck sh*t!

Some women have a GUN.

agreed, but most people aren't murderers. so a gun isn't much use. what are you going to do, point a gun in someones face every time they take your parking spot?

 

[penkitten]

I "resort" to using my woman powers.

/QUOTE]
i resort to cussing and hitting the tire with the tire iron thing and getting more pissed off , and then maybe i can be soooo pissed off that i can loosen the lug nut on my rage alone because i am out in the cold rain trying to change this tire in the dark and seven guys have passed by and did not stop to ask if i was ok. i wouldn't have asked them to change it for me, but i would have asked if they had a cell phone that i could use to call someone that could come help me like aaa .
but what pisses me off for real, is on the way home, you will see some other chick break down, and she gets out and puts one arm on her hip and waves her other arm up one time and three cars pull right over.
at least i tried on my own...

 

[iqqi]

and until men start demanding more from women other than them simply flashing their p*ssy at them, things are never going to change.

I wonder if you realize that just because you haven't been doing this...

well nevermind. (saves breath)... most of the points on this thread from you guys are STOOOPID.

 

[iqqi]

agreed, but most people aren't murderers. so a gun isn't much use. what are you going to do, point a gun in someones face every time they take your parking spot?

Are you serious? I think the whole taking a parking lot space thing has more to do with balls (NOT LITERALLY) than size...

 

[ketostix]

agreed, but most people aren't murderers. so a gun isn't much use. what are you going to do, point a gun in someones face every time they take your parking spot?

This reminds me of my brother-in-law who was a retired detective. He wasn't happy at all that they started loading the police force with women. He said about women cops, "If all you can do is pull your gun and shoot then you're in trouble.."

 

[iqqi]

at least i tried on my own...

Honestly... in this situation and others like it, I just ask nicely. And MAYBE bat some eyelashes.

It so happens to help that I am cute, female, and 100 lbs-ish.

Men love that sh!t anyways.

 

[joekerr31]

Honestly... in this situation and others like it, I just ask nicely. And MAYBE bat some eyelashes.

It so happens to help that I am cute, female, and 100 lbs-ish.

Men love that sh!t anyways.

hahaha. you don't even realize how this comment readily exemplifies the pathetic state of female thinking now a days.

here a man stops, helps you out, fixes your tire for you, and your perception of the event would be "men love that sh*t anyways" (ie. men love to help a damsel in distress, why should i be thankful them. i bat my eyes, they fix my tire, fair trade).

THIS is EXACTLY how most women think today.

 

[penkitten]

there are many women who will not be with a man who can not do something for her or better her life.
this was instilled in her from a child, probably by a bitter mother or grandmother or whatever that all men were dogs.
now mind you, no one instilled, be independent and get an education so you will not have to be tied down with a man that you do not desire to be tied down to, instead they instill, make him give you what you deserve.

and this is generations old coming to surface now.
since the dawn of time, each mother taught her children something, and they taught theirs, etc....
now we have mothers teaching their sons to do whatever makes their wives happy and to comply and we have daughters learning to stomp a foot and make a sad face and the world is your oyster.

 

[joekerr31]

now we have mothers teaching their sons to do whatever makes their wives happy and to comply and we have daughters learning to stomp a foot and make a sad face and the world is your oyster.

this is what i've said for a long time. women get what they want by behaving like children - throwing tantrums, crying, saying 'daddy i love you', etc.

as for men being taught by their mothers. to be honest, i think for most men no one teaches them anything. i think they do whatever they can to make their wives happy because they are deep down hoping that she will start to behave like their mothers use to (who loved them unconditionally).

men will often work VERY hard to win a womans unconditionally love. and then when it never comes, when her tactics remain those of manipulation instead of commitment and trust, men often realize 'oh my god, what kind of ungodly creature have i chained myself to?"

hehe

 

[iqqi]

here a man stops, helps you out, fixes your tire for you, and your perception of the event would be "men love that sh*t anyways" (ie. men love to help a damsel in distress, why should i be thankful them. i bat my eyes, they fix my tire, fair trade).
.

And here you are thinking that because a man stopped to do something nice for someone who needed it, or displayed MANNERS, that he is ENTITLED to something.

??

You shouldn't DO SH!T for someone and EXPECT something in return unless there is a CONTRACT. People like you are the WORSE types of human beings.

 

[penkitten]

joekerr, i think there are alot of men out there that women think the same thing about.

 

[iqqi]

Add to that the stigma that the "nice" guy carries around with him...that the world OWES him something for all the niceness he gives away. That's why women get CREEPED THE F*CK OUT by nice guys...because nice guys often offer "niceties" unsolicited, then expect some kind of gratitude in the form of affection.

It's really no different than the pedophile giving a little kid some candy in the hopes of earning his trust and using it for his own twisted agenda. CREEPY!!


The nice, caring, "giving" guy is actually not a "giver" at all...he's a pressure-salesman. He's a guilt-tripper, who uses his "niceties" to try to FORCE women, via socially ingrained notions of obligation, into a relationship she wants NO PART OF. Sh!t, you may as well just get right to the point and use duct tape instead of this kind of coercion. At least then it's clear that she's getting ABUSED.

That's right, Mr. Nice Guy. You are ABUSING women with your "I was nice to you, you owe me" attitude. She doesn't owe you SH!T, no matter how often you listen to her problems or fix her computer or help her with her homework. You want a woman to OWE you affection, go downtown and pick up one off the street...then her pimp will MAKE her put out for the money you were "nice" enough to pay her.

There's nothing wrong with being NICE, so long as you do it because YOU want to do it and not because you think it earns you sh!t in this world. Because it doesn't.

READ THIS ONE HUNDRED TIMES.

 

[ketostix]

And here you are thinking that because a man stopped to do something nice for someone who needed it, or displayed MANNERS, that he is ENTITLED to something.

??

You shouldn't DO SH!T for someone and EXPECT something in return unless there is a CONTRACT. People like you are the WORSE types of human beings.

Well you're saying you should get something for nothing. Talk about entitled. That's not how it works. For you to get something for nothing means the transaction wasn't win-win. It was win-lose and the other person got ripped off.