Quiksilver said:
Yeah okay squat/dead/bench are compound exercises but the day after i do heavy squats my chest isn't sore, my upper/lower back isnt sore.
What are you getting at here?
What does soreness indicate? About nothing. I don't get sore much at all unless i haven't lifted for a while. My lower back isn't sore the day after deadlifts.
I don't know how you are keeping your chest lifted or your lower back in place if you aren't using your entire back on a squat. Those things are being worked isometrically. Next you'll tell me my hamstrings and calves aren't being worked either, I suppose. How about that the delts are used in a deadlift?
If you're lifting with 90-100% effort, your CNS can't support maxing out legs/back/chest in the same workout. You make far better strength gains with a split. Full body workouts are more for fitness/conditioning/cardio, or if you don't care about strength gains
Wow, dude. I've managed to do it for 36 weeks. In the Texas Method you do all 3 for a 1-5RM every Friday. One work set each. I've seen no difference in doing squats or deadlifts first either. I squat first if no one is in the rack and if not, which is frequent, i deadlift first. Am I special? I doubt it.
5x5 of all 3 on Mondays.
We're not advanced or elite in strength levels or in progression rates.
I'm no huge advocate of 5x5. It's just a simple system and one way to do things. Lots of methods of doing stuff works. You're supposed to tweak and change things as you progress. Add sets, remove sets, increase reps, decrease reps... whatever gets the numbers moving up again. 5x5 is intended as more of a starting point and adjusting from there... or for a point to return to to start adjusting again when you get lost.
The funny thing is that a lot of sites like the main DC site recommend getting as strong and as big as possible on systems like 5x5 before even touching DC.