There is a problem with the article - it suggest a false dichotomy:
"The old guard is like: 'Yeah, but you have to care ultimately about the truth,'" Green says. "The Gen Z take is: 'You can tell me your truth and what you think is important.'" What establishes the relevance of a claim isn't some established notion of authority. It's the social signals they get from their peers.
The truth ultimately stands on its own, notwithstanding what peers *or* authority figures think. You can only suspect the author is leaning towards authority over truth when they chastise Gen Z'ers for persuing comment sections before actual articles. In the age of Deep State media, this is actually preferable, presuming you then use your own discernment to form your own views. Not too sure the author wants people using their discernment that much.
"They just read the headlines and then speed-scroll to the comments, to see what everyone else says. They're outsourcing the determination of truth and importance to like-minded, trusted influencers."
Gee, these kids are weaklings for not trusting authority when western corruption is at an all-time high, aren't they? Lolz.