Abbott
Master Don Juan
Have you considered inflation? DeathDealer is saying the truth here. I don't know the exact numbers but I do know that the buying power of minimum wage has been going down.
Yes, you are correct that the actual literal amount of money paid per hour today would be more than what would've been paid in the past (in 1930 when minimum wage was introduced it was $.30/hour). However, the amount of stuff that you can buy with that money is less now than it was before, so for all practical purposes minimum wage has gotten worse, mainly because it hasn't been keeping pace with inflation. In 1968, I've heard that the minimum wage then, if adjusted for inflation, would be about $8.45/hour (2003 dollars), which is 64% higher than todays minimum wage of $5.15 (I heard that minimum wage will rise to $6.15 on January 1st, 2005, so the difference would be 37%).
Also, I've heard that during the 1990s, executive salaries rose by a huge margin. Duh! But what's interesting is that if minimum wage increased at a rate similar to the rate executive salaries increased, it would now be about $25/hour, or 385% more. That's also $52,000 a year, which is MORE than the average household income of 2001 ($42,228/year). Sickening, really.
I don't believe that DeathDealer was trying to appeal to laziness. Just that he was trying to say that times are different and some things ARE harder to do now than they were before (only he didn't have as many figures as I have here). Honestly, I don't favor laziness either, but I do know that it IS harder now.
Minimum wage is bad, and college is now practically mandatory. In addition, federal grant money for tuition isn't as good as it used to be, combined with skyrocketing tuition costs. The result? Many students have obscene amounts of debt and negative net worth. This smashes their credit which makes it hard to get a mortgage for a house (because with all the student loan debt it'll be too hard to just buy the house in a reasonable amount of time).
If anyone can read this and not be completely infuriated, then you, my friend are either stupid or heartless.
Ben
Yes, you are correct that the actual literal amount of money paid per hour today would be more than what would've been paid in the past (in 1930 when minimum wage was introduced it was $.30/hour). However, the amount of stuff that you can buy with that money is less now than it was before, so for all practical purposes minimum wage has gotten worse, mainly because it hasn't been keeping pace with inflation. In 1968, I've heard that the minimum wage then, if adjusted for inflation, would be about $8.45/hour (2003 dollars), which is 64% higher than todays minimum wage of $5.15 (I heard that minimum wage will rise to $6.15 on January 1st, 2005, so the difference would be 37%).
Also, I've heard that during the 1990s, executive salaries rose by a huge margin. Duh! But what's interesting is that if minimum wage increased at a rate similar to the rate executive salaries increased, it would now be about $25/hour, or 385% more. That's also $52,000 a year, which is MORE than the average household income of 2001 ($42,228/year). Sickening, really.
I don't believe that DeathDealer was trying to appeal to laziness. Just that he was trying to say that times are different and some things ARE harder to do now than they were before (only he didn't have as many figures as I have here). Honestly, I don't favor laziness either, but I do know that it IS harder now.
Minimum wage is bad, and college is now practically mandatory. In addition, federal grant money for tuition isn't as good as it used to be, combined with skyrocketing tuition costs. The result? Many students have obscene amounts of debt and negative net worth. This smashes their credit which makes it hard to get a mortgage for a house (because with all the student loan debt it'll be too hard to just buy the house in a reasonable amount of time).
If anyone can read this and not be completely infuriated, then you, my friend are either stupid or heartless.
Ben