Faggot NY TIMES WRITER Says MEN ARE WORTHLESS
- Thread starter Burroughs
- Start date
actually, i think the author got the title wrong. he probably meant to say white men are no longer needed. lol.
but really, these articles, like others said, are just meant to get clicks. in the interent era, this is what you get, very lame
attempts to get people on the site, and hope they come back.
but really, these articles, like others said, are just meant to get clicks. in the interent era, this is what you get, very lame
attempts to get people on the site, and hope they come back.
HalfAddict
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2005
- Messages
- 776
- Reaction score
- 29
- Age
- 40
Heh I think I should get a greyhound ticket to Boise, wait in the parking lot of the University until Greg Hampikian and stomp his teeth in :crackup: or perhaps bring a large group with me and crucify him for blasphemy and treason.
greghampikian@boisestate.edu
greghampikian@boisestate.edu
Last edited:
SharinganUser
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2006
- Messages
- 1,777
- Reaction score
- 50
Just sickening. He needs to get his phd taken away if he thinks that men are unnecessary.
Typical feminist product of the university system. It's already been mentioned, these op ed posts are great ways of getting links back to the hosting site. From which come great search engine ranking benefits and more $$.
Regardless of what this feminist tool bag barfs out, women know deep down that men are essential in society, they just hate to admit it. Men may play a limited roll in the actual act of conception, but it's quite the opposite in all other areas of parenting.
Any woman that says otherwise is likely single, fat, unattractive and angry.
Shame on this manb!tch for betraying the gender and for propagating the feminist agenda. Pathetic.
Regardless of what this feminist tool bag barfs out, women know deep down that men are essential in society, they just hate to admit it. Men may play a limited roll in the actual act of conception, but it's quite the opposite in all other areas of parenting.
Any woman that says otherwise is likely single, fat, unattractive and angry.
Shame on this manb!tch for betraying the gender and for propagating the feminist agenda. Pathetic.
zekko
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,009
- Reaction score
- 8,818
Not too surprising, unfortunately. Note that Michael Moore is the biggest critic of males in the video from this thread, even though there are three females on the panel:Findog said:
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=197193
I was watching the news this morning, they were talking about how the presidential candidates are seeking favor from females, because they make up 54% of registered voters. Not only that, but a higher percentage of women voters than men actually vote. So we're not only outnumbered to begin with, we're also sitting on the sidelines and conceding electoral outcomes to be decided by women.Social Leper said:
I don't see us getting candidates favorable to men's issues anytime in the near future, but men should at least vote in high numbers so their concerns are taken into consideration. Add in the fact that more women than men are getting higher education, and I have to wonder what the heck is going on with the male gender these days. We're not losing this war, gentlemen, we're giving it away.
By the way, does anyone think it is a coincidence that the fall of the United States has happened at the same time as the fall of their men?
Something like this was what I was thinking the whole thread. The eradication of men completely will never actually transpire and here's why:samspade said:
Alphas hold such a huge place in women's lives. Sure these b!tches wouldn't think twice or lose any sleep to wipe all the betas off the map. But when they think of that one guy that was (alpha widow) or is their entire universe, they will recoil in terror at trying to eradicate men altogether.
I just broke things off with a HB9 that I've been off and on with for about two years now. This girl is incredibly attractive, smart, funny, best lay I ever had, etc, etc. She's got a world of opportunity open to her. But last night she was so emotional she was texting me she wanted to die, etc, etc. Trust me this didn't make me feel like an awesome alpha, it was depressing and I felt like an a**hole. But as we all know, often the right thing to do is the hardest.
Anyway, the point of all that is this: the solution to all this nonsense and rhetoric is to BE MEN. I agree with Burroughs that 95% of guys will compromise almost anything just to get their d*** wet. It's embarrassing. I see the guys around me and even some of my good friends do this on a regular basis and it's hard to watch.
I have a friend, who is a good guy, about as solid as they come character wise. He and his gf fought all the time, for months and months. She was 17 and he was 26. She was of the trailer trash bent, and a HB5 on my most generous day of rating. So one night they get in a big fight and she sleeps with his roommate/best-friend. So what does he do? He MARRIES her the very next day and cuts off ties with his roomie. I couldn't believe it. More than once before all this happened I had a diplomatic talk with him and warned him not to let this girl suck his soul away.
Now she is obviously a wh0re, BUT, who really is to blame in this scenario? THE MEN. First, the roomie who betrayed his best friend just to get his sorry d!ck into a pitiful HB5. And obviously my friend, for then MARRYING said girl. The whole thing saddened and angered me. Until men stop behaving like this, just for the p*ssy, then nothing changes.
disgustipated
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2011
- Messages
- 509
- Reaction score
- 29
Reading his wall,.full of female support btw, its clear they are taking the intellectually superior position thinking the tongue in cheek nature is over our heads....with comments like, they don't get it and you hit a nerve. To message the guy I think you have to.friend him. Not going there.
You nailed it here with this statement. Men are to blame for the way things are today with women. We've let them skate by for a very long time and now they've passed us on many fronts and we're pissed as hell about it.AlphaWhiskey said:
By and large men need to be men, plain and simple. But quite frankly, I think many men are perfectly happy wearing the dress in the house. They like letting the women direct things and call the shots. I see it all day every day where I live in beta world.
The women stomp around in their SUVs and designer clothing, ordering the husband around like the drone he is as he pushes the cart around with the kids in it. He's anything but a leader and in my mind quite a deplorable human being. The wife asks him what he wants to do, "i dunno, what do you want to do?" is his reply as if he doesn't even own an original thought. Most seem to lack the balls to even state their opinion on a matter.
Modern women seem to have taken on both roles in the house/society because by and large weak men have let it happen. Until that changes, I don't see feminism, or society's hostile views toward men going away anytime soon. Change starts with us.
Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,071
- Reaction score
- 4,667
Unless it's family, your wife/gf, a long time trusted female friend, or maybe some elderly lady neighbor, stop doing manly favors for women...
No more changing their tires, hooking up their washer/dryer, etc.
If men aren't needed, women can do everything themselves or pay someone to do it.
Her hard drive crashed. You suddenly are too busy or don't know much about computers to help lol.
No more changing their tires, hooking up their washer/dryer, etc.
If men aren't needed, women can do everything themselves or pay someone to do it.
Her hard drive crashed. You suddenly are too busy or don't know much about computers to help lol.
during the first world war in the uk, women had been given the vote, however, so many men were being conscripted for service overseas (and loads of them dying) the Govt had to cut back on conscription as now women had the vote, they would outnumber male voters, I Hope that those in control of this effing planet take the same view, the govt at the time made some real balls ups, this wasnt one of themzekko said:
I'm pretty sure this should be taken tongue-in-cheek. This guy is not saying men aren't needed in life, just that they are increasingly not involved in raising the next generation and, perhaps soon, not needed to start it.
And I assume most posters on SoSuave are from fairly middle-class whitebread backgrounds. Where I come from, working-class, majority minority, women are already the only ones around to raise the next generation. Men around here abdicated that responsibility long ago. Which isn't good, but that's our fault.
And I assume most posters on SoSuave are from fairly middle-class whitebread backgrounds. Where I come from, working-class, majority minority, women are already the only ones around to raise the next generation. Men around here abdicated that responsibility long ago. Which isn't good, but that's our fault.
( . )( . )
Banned
They always are and you've entirely missed OP's point, the continual barrage of misandry adds up.FairShake said:
btw what's your angle here? Here your defending an overtly misandric article.
Here you appear to be totally oblivious to our current social and cultural climate. Giving up our freedom and literally being classified as a second class gender so cluster phucks such as zarky et al can finally get laid is not "giving men exactly what they want" you simpleton.FairShake said:
I won't even start on that other thread where you gave MatureDJ a warning for not being politically correct enough for you.
OldbutSTRONG
Don Juan
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2009
- Messages
- 70
- Reaction score
- 2
This article is really nothing to get worked up about. The writer is obviously trying to create interest for the advertisers.
People have to admit most of crimes are committed by men. If the world was going to end tomorrow and it was announced, a lot of guys would go out and commit sexual assault. Sad, but true.
People have to admit most of crimes are committed by men. If the world was going to end tomorrow and it was announced, a lot of guys would go out and commit sexual assault. Sad, but true.
HalfAddict
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2005
- Messages
- 776
- Reaction score
- 29
- Age
- 40
Interesting observation oldbutSTRONG, that really says something though does it not? WHY would men go commit a sexual assault if they knew the world was coming to an end? Says something about the "sexual market" today imo.
( . )( . )
Banned
Hate them because they sound like a 20 something SWPL with a bachelors degree in humanities teaching her first grade 5 class.ka_mate said:
What in the blue phuck does this have to do with men tiring of constantly being demonized by a blatently obvious misandric media.
There are more women employed than men in the US, as of now. But there are more working age men than women in the US and in every other population on Earth. Since HR is mostly run by women now -- and HR is the gatekeepers for job entry -- that lopsidedness will become even more lopsided. Men are being locked out from the bottom.
That's the Glass Floor.
The distribution of power, wealth and control is going to get very lopsided even more so than when it was a man's world.
About 10% of men in the US are in jail, many on non-violent offenses or crimes that were not considered crimes a generation or two ago. If states run out of money, prisoners will be required to pay for their stay in jail. That's forced labor.
That's a slave class formed of men.
On the other side of the equation: most people coming out of college in public administration are women. If jail wardens also tip toward female majority, then the institutions holding the population of male slaves will be run by women.
In other words, you are slowly seeing the pieces being put into place of the transformation of the male population into a slave class, subordinate to women and at a lower standing.
These are also the seeds of violent backlash and revolution by a large and growing number of disaffected and displaced males against what this society is becoming.
That's the Glass Floor.
The distribution of power, wealth and control is going to get very lopsided even more so than when it was a man's world.
About 10% of men in the US are in jail, many on non-violent offenses or crimes that were not considered crimes a generation or two ago. If states run out of money, prisoners will be required to pay for their stay in jail. That's forced labor.
That's a slave class formed of men.
On the other side of the equation: most people coming out of college in public administration are women. If jail wardens also tip toward female majority, then the institutions holding the population of male slaves will be run by women.
In other words, you are slowly seeing the pieces being put into place of the transformation of the male population into a slave class, subordinate to women and at a lower standing.
These are also the seeds of violent backlash and revolution by a large and growing number of disaffected and displaced males against what this society is becoming.
People also have to admit crimes committed by women go under reported on a consistent basis. In light of this, we can't really say for sure if men commit more crime.OldbutSTRONG said:
I don't read stories of men putting their babies in dumpsters or trying to flush them down toilets.
