SmoothSmooth
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2021
- Messages
- 548
- Reaction score
- 587
- Age
- 31
Disclaimer - this post is for those that seriously want to understand women and live a dating life of abundance. It is not for bitter men, or those who have given up.
This is also only for men that want to date women in their prime - objectively desireable, hot girls aged 18-25. For those who want older women, ignore this advice, as these women have 'had their fun' and are now looking for a provider.
I see comments on here and PUA circles like 'women aren't as visual as men', 'women don't care about money' 'older men cant date younger girls'...Please just shut up and use common sense. If women aren't doing interested in a mens looks or money, and aren't attracted to his maturity, then you are somewhat implying that women are interested in ugly broke immature men, which is clearly not the case. It is very obvious that most men in their 20s struggle to get any attention on the dating scene, and most average men settle with the first girlfriend they get find - so what classifies an 'average man' other than average looks and average money!
Understand this, women are selecting the future fathers of the next generation. If you don't think having a good looking and rich father isn't good for the kids, you are straight up deluded. If your father was better looking or richer, your life would have been much easier now. Becoming good with women is essentially nothing more than becoming the ideal 'dad' for kids one day. Every kid wants their dad to be a superhero-like figure, and im sorry to say that a fat, broke dad is not ideal.
So, what are women attracted to? Those that claim it's not looks and money, will talk about 'game'. But clearly, game isn't the solution. If it was, there wouldn't be a dating crisis right now. Every single PUA coach has pretty much gone out of business, and the ones in operation have very little evidence that their 'game' leads to REAL results. For example, RSD Todd has been shown to have a very mediocre looking girlfriend, that other dude on youtube 'playing with fire' - his girlfriend is looksmatched to him and again average looking, neil strauss's wife was nothing special and also divorced him. The truth is, most PUA's just show you evidence of ability to get numbers etc but anyone with experience will tell you that getting a number or talking to some drunk girls on a night out rarely just leads to anything the next day. Neil Strauss once bragged about getting Britney Spear's number...but who cares? So what? Probably just handed out his number because he was in Hollywood in the time and it's what women do. Women love to lead guys along. But look at the guys Britney actually dated - justin timberlake, kevin federline, sam asghari - you get the picture. It's funny because only on the internet do you see groups of men repeating sentiments like 'looks dont matter' or creating fables of 'what women really want is game'. But in the real world, nobody thinks thats. In the real world, when people see a good looking tall man, they automatically assume he is a heartbreaker or player. Because subconsciously, when we think of an attractive man - we think James Bond - looks, moeny and status. The fundamental flaw with all these 'game' coaches is that 'game' implies that the woman is already rejecting you and you need a tactic to raise her interest. For example 'text game' implies she is giving you bad replies and you need to somehow manipulate this dire situation of rejection into one of attraction. In reality, the top guys are starting from a place of attraction - women are selecting them and as a result, it is the woman who is fretting over writing the perfect text response (anyone with female friends will verify this - women will ask their friends for advice on what they should reply to their crush). The reality of an attractive guy is one where he rejects alot of women and also doesn't think through the lense of 'game' (raising interest) but rather preserving and mainting interest that is already there. Instead of teaching you how to become the attractive guy that women are excited to talk to and see, these coaches will act as you can remain unattractive and get results. However attraction is competitive and a woman will not disregard your out of shape body because you watched a few PUA videos. If she is a good looking girl that is surrounded by athletic men, an out of shape man will look like an anomaly to her and it will seem like there is something wrong with you.
People are attracted to the idea of game because it makes them feel better about themselves. Instead of realising she rejected you because you weren't attractive to her, you can blame your 'text game', watch some more videos that teach you how to text better and imagine that you just made a silly mistake and the next girl is gonna be yours because you've learnt the correct trick. From a logical standpoint, this is completely unsustainable. If she is selecting you based on your game or text skills then what happens when she actually has to spend time with you and the playbook runs out?
So...Let me tell you how it works. Men are naturally suited for polygamy. What that means is, we can 'settle' when it comes to sex. We don't look for the perfect woman to sleep with, we look for a girl that is good enough in that moment. We can bang JLO even though we think Beyonce has a better ass. We can bang the really hot girl despite her annoying habits. We can bang a 7/10 and feel good about it, because we know the next day we could get an 8.5/10...we can appreciate different things about different women and are generally way more realistic. Women on the other hand are suited for monogamy. What that means is, they look for the perfect man. Of course, this is very hard to find, so they go for the guy that is closest to the most perfect guy they can imagine - which is more of a holistic approach - ie the guy that ticks off the most boxes in the most categories. This is because, even in modern times, just being seen with the wrong guy can be detrimental to her social and sexual market value and a host of other reasons why it is better to just see one man for an extended period of time (even if casually). This dynamic underlies human mating and will never change.
So the aim is to know the categories/criteria that women are selecting for and max out as much as possible in each of them. No man will reach 100% in all, but as you start to improve in them one by one, you notice that dating because a whole lot easier. In fact, dating as you know it will completely change. You start seeing the hot women, that you once pedestalize and thought were totally alien, are infact just as sexually aggressive as men - and love sex like guys d0 - and will start to feel entitled to having you. Dating no longer becomes about finding sneaky ways to convince someone to like you, but rather a normal part of your social life. Because all these posts about ‘she is being hot/cold’ ‘she flaked’ ‘what should I reply’ just mean one thing - you’re not attractive enough. Attractive men do still get some **** tests, but they are minimal and only occur when they dynamic of attraction has already been established initially (in other words; you already know she wants you)
The beauty of it is that most men do not have this knowledge. They think either in blue pill terms, or they think women just one particular thing (eg looks, or money) and only max out one category. In reality, its better to be 50% across the board than 100% in just one category. So when you see 'that good looking guy that doesnt get girls' or 'that millionaire that cant get laid' its NOT BECAUSE GIRLS DONT LIKE LOOKS OR MONEY, its because those men did not have enough points in other categories to spark attraction. With women, being attractive is about having a vagina. With men, being attractive is about becoming a PACKAGE.
So let me breakdown the categories
1) Height
Forget what you heard online. Height is the first thing a woman notices on a man. This doesnt reflect on online dating, but online dating is not the real world. Iin the real world, we all know it. Height induces an immediate feeling of dominance to others around them. Its just a signal of good genes and you want taller kids. From a genetic perspective, things that are rare are more coveted - and tall men are by definition rare. So what is 'tall'? 6ft and above. It's almost like women can tell the difference between 5'11 and 6ft.
The good news is, if you don't have the height, just max out in the other categories. Remember, there is no 'perfect man' to a woman. Just the man that has the most points in the most categories at a given moment.
This is also only for men that want to date women in their prime - objectively desireable, hot girls aged 18-25. For those who want older women, ignore this advice, as these women have 'had their fun' and are now looking for a provider.
I see comments on here and PUA circles like 'women aren't as visual as men', 'women don't care about money' 'older men cant date younger girls'...Please just shut up and use common sense. If women aren't doing interested in a mens looks or money, and aren't attracted to his maturity, then you are somewhat implying that women are interested in ugly broke immature men, which is clearly not the case. It is very obvious that most men in their 20s struggle to get any attention on the dating scene, and most average men settle with the first girlfriend they get find - so what classifies an 'average man' other than average looks and average money!
Understand this, women are selecting the future fathers of the next generation. If you don't think having a good looking and rich father isn't good for the kids, you are straight up deluded. If your father was better looking or richer, your life would have been much easier now. Becoming good with women is essentially nothing more than becoming the ideal 'dad' for kids one day. Every kid wants their dad to be a superhero-like figure, and im sorry to say that a fat, broke dad is not ideal.
So, what are women attracted to? Those that claim it's not looks and money, will talk about 'game'. But clearly, game isn't the solution. If it was, there wouldn't be a dating crisis right now. Every single PUA coach has pretty much gone out of business, and the ones in operation have very little evidence that their 'game' leads to REAL results. For example, RSD Todd has been shown to have a very mediocre looking girlfriend, that other dude on youtube 'playing with fire' - his girlfriend is looksmatched to him and again average looking, neil strauss's wife was nothing special and also divorced him. The truth is, most PUA's just show you evidence of ability to get numbers etc but anyone with experience will tell you that getting a number or talking to some drunk girls on a night out rarely just leads to anything the next day. Neil Strauss once bragged about getting Britney Spear's number...but who cares? So what? Probably just handed out his number because he was in Hollywood in the time and it's what women do. Women love to lead guys along. But look at the guys Britney actually dated - justin timberlake, kevin federline, sam asghari - you get the picture. It's funny because only on the internet do you see groups of men repeating sentiments like 'looks dont matter' or creating fables of 'what women really want is game'. But in the real world, nobody thinks thats. In the real world, when people see a good looking tall man, they automatically assume he is a heartbreaker or player. Because subconsciously, when we think of an attractive man - we think James Bond - looks, moeny and status. The fundamental flaw with all these 'game' coaches is that 'game' implies that the woman is already rejecting you and you need a tactic to raise her interest. For example 'text game' implies she is giving you bad replies and you need to somehow manipulate this dire situation of rejection into one of attraction. In reality, the top guys are starting from a place of attraction - women are selecting them and as a result, it is the woman who is fretting over writing the perfect text response (anyone with female friends will verify this - women will ask their friends for advice on what they should reply to their crush). The reality of an attractive guy is one where he rejects alot of women and also doesn't think through the lense of 'game' (raising interest) but rather preserving and mainting interest that is already there. Instead of teaching you how to become the attractive guy that women are excited to talk to and see, these coaches will act as you can remain unattractive and get results. However attraction is competitive and a woman will not disregard your out of shape body because you watched a few PUA videos. If she is a good looking girl that is surrounded by athletic men, an out of shape man will look like an anomaly to her and it will seem like there is something wrong with you.
People are attracted to the idea of game because it makes them feel better about themselves. Instead of realising she rejected you because you weren't attractive to her, you can blame your 'text game', watch some more videos that teach you how to text better and imagine that you just made a silly mistake and the next girl is gonna be yours because you've learnt the correct trick. From a logical standpoint, this is completely unsustainable. If she is selecting you based on your game or text skills then what happens when she actually has to spend time with you and the playbook runs out?
So...Let me tell you how it works. Men are naturally suited for polygamy. What that means is, we can 'settle' when it comes to sex. We don't look for the perfect woman to sleep with, we look for a girl that is good enough in that moment. We can bang JLO even though we think Beyonce has a better ass. We can bang the really hot girl despite her annoying habits. We can bang a 7/10 and feel good about it, because we know the next day we could get an 8.5/10...we can appreciate different things about different women and are generally way more realistic. Women on the other hand are suited for monogamy. What that means is, they look for the perfect man. Of course, this is very hard to find, so they go for the guy that is closest to the most perfect guy they can imagine - which is more of a holistic approach - ie the guy that ticks off the most boxes in the most categories. This is because, even in modern times, just being seen with the wrong guy can be detrimental to her social and sexual market value and a host of other reasons why it is better to just see one man for an extended period of time (even if casually). This dynamic underlies human mating and will never change.
So the aim is to know the categories/criteria that women are selecting for and max out as much as possible in each of them. No man will reach 100% in all, but as you start to improve in them one by one, you notice that dating because a whole lot easier. In fact, dating as you know it will completely change. You start seeing the hot women, that you once pedestalize and thought were totally alien, are infact just as sexually aggressive as men - and love sex like guys d0 - and will start to feel entitled to having you. Dating no longer becomes about finding sneaky ways to convince someone to like you, but rather a normal part of your social life. Because all these posts about ‘she is being hot/cold’ ‘she flaked’ ‘what should I reply’ just mean one thing - you’re not attractive enough. Attractive men do still get some **** tests, but they are minimal and only occur when they dynamic of attraction has already been established initially (in other words; you already know she wants you)
The beauty of it is that most men do not have this knowledge. They think either in blue pill terms, or they think women just one particular thing (eg looks, or money) and only max out one category. In reality, its better to be 50% across the board than 100% in just one category. So when you see 'that good looking guy that doesnt get girls' or 'that millionaire that cant get laid' its NOT BECAUSE GIRLS DONT LIKE LOOKS OR MONEY, its because those men did not have enough points in other categories to spark attraction. With women, being attractive is about having a vagina. With men, being attractive is about becoming a PACKAGE.
So let me breakdown the categories
1) Height
Forget what you heard online. Height is the first thing a woman notices on a man. This doesnt reflect on online dating, but online dating is not the real world. Iin the real world, we all know it. Height induces an immediate feeling of dominance to others around them. Its just a signal of good genes and you want taller kids. From a genetic perspective, things that are rare are more coveted - and tall men are by definition rare. So what is 'tall'? 6ft and above. It's almost like women can tell the difference between 5'11 and 6ft.
The good news is, if you don't have the height, just max out in the other categories. Remember, there is no 'perfect man' to a woman. Just the man that has the most points in the most categories at a given moment.
Last edited: