Every Woman Left On The Market Is Fvcked Up

[Atom Smasher]

Perspectives on this can vary greatly with age. I've enjoyed a full life on being single and never married for the very reasons you state. Now that I'm pushing 60, I'm thinking in terms of settling down. I can say categorically that I have zero fear of losing this woman. If something were to happen, c'est la vie.

I think you younger guys have a hard time imagining how drastically a man changes from say age 30 to age 60. A more mature man is less likely to pedestalize a woman. It really does become easier to not give a sh!t about things. In all our discussions, age and seasons of life must be factored in.

I tell guys here what I've learned in life to encourage them... to let them know that as bad as things are with women these days (and it really is astoundingly bad), there is hope as they grow older and a man starts to regard women with far less importance.

Simultaneously with that, a man's intuition becomes much more refined as does his ability to vet a woman for her character. I generally agree with you 99%, PK. I just have come to know that there is a tiny percentage of women who are not seriously affected by the mass degradation of character we have seen.

I say wise is the man who rejects the crap that is out there (meaning most of the female gender) and holds out for the rare one that might cross his path from time to time. Like I said, I went from being completely confused about women, wondering why they universally "hated" me, to the one who either rejects or chooses them. Quite a switch. It all came from my telling myself that I don't care about them anymore because I'm better than them. And I absolutely believe that is true.

What I found was that I was previously a ghost to higher-quality women. They didn't really hate me... rather, I was a non-entity to them. For them it was like driving on a parkway and I was just one of the thousands of trees whizzing by. Totally forgettable. That's what many of us are here... nothing but an invisible phantom.

To make yourself visible to them, you must disappear to the others, the 98 or 99% of womankind. They should be nothing to you... nothing but trees whizzing past you on the parkway. Out of that blur, the worthy woman appears in front of you.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Remember that spending your life looking for a unicorn is a sh!tty dating strategy.

Agreed. That's why you don't look for her. You develop yourself, and one day you are able to see the unicorns, and they are able to see you. When they see you, they come to you. They don't play the sick game that most of us are forced to play with them. They come to you, and they immediately submit.

 

[zekko]

Those unicorns are not going to outcompete the hotter, more skilled at seduction gold diggers putting on an act imo

Depends on what you are looking for. I value honesty very highly in my life, both in myself and others. As such, I am highly sensitive to screening for that trait, and I tend to attract relatively honest women.

I say relatively because no woman (or man, for that matter) is 100% honest. I can spot women putting on an act a mile away. They don't ring true to me. Part of the increased perception that Smasher says comes with age.

 

[guugly]

OP obviously doesnt know where to look, or wont spend the necessary amount of money to get a quality lady.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Those unicorns are not going to outcompete the hotter, more skilled at seduction gold diggers putting on an act imo

Shame on the man who can't identify them early.

 

[Poon King]

Agreed. That's why you don't look for her. You develop yourself, and one day you are able to see the unicorns, and they are able to see you. When they see you, they come to you. They don't play the sick game that most of us are forced to play with them. They come to you, and they immediately submit.

Here is something to think about...

Why are these "unicorns" only visible when a man crosses the finish line? If these are "good women" then they should be good regardless of a man's status. Just like a successful man is just as visible to hot women as he is to fat pigs.

Why do these women only "appear" under ideal circumstances? Could it be they are just gold digging wh0res who treat all men who are not successful like dirt? If that is the case.. what makes these women "better"?

 

[SkrooU]

Compatibility is starting to seem rather elusive lately. When I find women who are not on Tenacity's list, there is still something that renders us incompatible. I met an 8, good job, no kids, great personality, but she was super religious. I'm not. It wasn't an issue for me, but it was for her. Or we don't match politically. Maybe she hates animals, and I like dogs. There's always something.

 

[Tenacity]

Here is something to think about...

Why are these "unicorns" only visible when a man crosses the finish line? If these are "good women" then they should be good regardless of a man's status. Just like a successful man is just as visible to hot women as he is to fat pigs.

Why do these women only "appear" under ideal circumstances? Could it be they are just gold digging wh0res who treat all men who are not successful like dirt? If that is the case.. what makes these women "better"?

^^^ THIS right here.

This is the same thing I've been scratching my head saying. Where are these super, duper, high quality women at in general? Do they all sleep in caves and when the super, duper, high quality man walks out of the house....they all run out?

The part about the gold-digging aspect is also important. I just don't think there's a such thing as a high quality woman. What I believe you have are women who have POOR quality based on their attitude, horrible finances, multiple kids, weight issues, etc., etc.

But when you guys discuss these super high quality women, it's as if you are describing someone who doesn't:

- Get periods
- Have stank breath in the morning
- Have to wash her a.ss or else it stanks
- Have to wash under her arms, or else she's musty
- Have to wear artificial things such as make-up and more, to continually look "beautiful"

I also think the argument that once I start wearing fancy suits, these high quality women will appear, also makes no sense. Do I have to keep wearing fancy suits for her a.ss to respect me lol?

Again, in NO MEANS am I being an a.sshole right now, argumentative, or just a dyck. I'm trying to continue this conversation and also ask deeper/follow-up questions because the bottom line is that THIS conversation helps every MAN on this forum.

This conversation is far more productive than any of the other Red Pill related threads we've had here lately.

 

[devilkingx2]

Here is something to think about...

Why are these "unicorns" only visible when a man crosses the finish line? If these are "good women" then they should be good regardless of a man's status. Just like a successful man is just as visible to hot women as he is to fat pigs.

Why do these women only "appear" under ideal circumstances? Could it be they are just gold digging wh0res who treat all men who are not successful like dirt? If that is the case.. what makes these women "better"?

why does leonardo dicaprio get to date a string of hot models when i've never even met a model? it's likely a similar answer, these supposed unicorns if they exist, only have time for the best of the best men (either that, or you don't hang out in the right places to meet them)

This is the same thing I've been scratching my head saying. Where are these super, duper, high quality women at in general? Do they all sleep in caves and when the super, duper, high quality man walks out of the house....they all run out?

if you saw a serial killer, would you recognize them? of course not, there isn't really an established serial killer look

if you saw a celebrity who wasn't super A-list, would you recognize them at a glance? unless you were a fan of their work, probably not.

so, if you saw a perfect woman on the street, how would you know she was perfect just by looking at her? if you don't get her number, or if you can't get her out on a date, etc. how would you know?

plus, you gotta ask yourself if you hang out in places where your perfect girl would go.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

The question is, are you (any reader of this), as a man, able to draw her pure womanhood out of her? That means are you able to cause her societal pressures to fall by the wayside because her only desire is to submit to you

How does one do this? This unlocks the secret of the female. And in turn can unlock the secret of the male. I have been trying to accomplish this for a long time now. I have mastered 'game' as some call it to where it is second nature to me now. But I am not of the true legendary status of being able to have a woman WILLINGLY submit to me. I'm still really young, but how does one accomplish this? And does this work with all women too?

The biggest hint of all: Self-belief in opposition to all that you "know" and observe is the key to all accomplishment. Delusional self-belief... I decided to believe I was that which I wasn't yet. You can believe you are wealthy when you're broke. You can believe anything about yourself even though your circumstances tell you (or scream at you) otherwise. You will become what you choose to believe in.

As you think, you shall become.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Here is something to think about...

Why are these "unicorns" only visible when a man crosses the finish line? If these are "good women" then they should be good regardless of a man's status. Just like a successful man is just as visible to hot women as he is to fat pigs.

Why do these women only "appear" under ideal circumstances? Could it be they are just gold digging wh0res who treat all men who are not successful like dirt? If that is the case.. what makes these women "better"?

Nature dictates that a man does not want a sub-par woman, and a woman does not want a sub-par man. A few years ago I was a sub-par man (ie. confused about women and hence about myself), but I have risen above that simply because I achieved critical mass and crossed the line to a new life.

If a woman takes great pains to resist the media and social pressures and instead breaks away from the herd and becomes a woman of character, estranged from the herd, does she not deserve a quality man who has equally worked on himself?

 

[Atom Smasher]

How does one do this? This unlocks the secret of the female. And in turn can unlock the secret of the male. I have been trying to accomplish this for a long time now. I have mastered 'game' as some call it to where it is second nature to me now. But I am not of the true legendary status of being able to have a woman WILLINGLY submit to me. I'm still really young, but how does one accomplish this? And does this work with all women too?

As you think, you shall become.

You're very young but you're well on your way.

You need to enjoy more casual relationships right now. Your biggest challenge is that the girls (I do not say "women") in your age range are appallingly confused.

Some of those confused girls will break away from the herd as they mature. Be on the lookout for one of those. You will know her when you see her if you keep on developing your character as you have been doing.

But I do recommend that someone your age should be out having fun and not getting into a serious relationship yet. In four or five years your world is going to be very different.

 

[Atom Smasher]

And yes, IAmDoubleTheGreatest, my points are akin to the saying, "As you think, you shall become".

It is so true. I'm still finding areas in my life where I need to apply that more. But fortunately I know that I can do just that.

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

Nature dictates that a man does not want a sub-par woman, and a woman does not want a sub-par man. A few years ago I was a sub-par man (ie. confused about women and hence about myself), but I have risen above that simply because I achieved critical mass and crossed the line to a new life.

If a woman takes great pains to resist the media and social pressures and instead breaks away from the herd and becomes a woman of character, estranged from the herd, does she not deserve a quality man who has equally worked on himself?

Granting that. However, I think it is more difficult for a woman to break away from media because she is more prone to stimulation. Man is a more reflective being. Though we share both qualities, the masculine or feminine trait predominates [I love how you can be non-PC here.. ha ha]. If this is the case, then a woman may require a man in order to aid her in being truly grounded. Thinking of the great chain of being thing....

 

[Atom Smasher]

^^^ THIS right here.

This is the same thing I've been scratching my head saying. Where are these super, duper, high quality women at in general? Do they all sleep in caves and when the super, duper, high quality man walks out of the house....they all run out?

The part about the gold-digging aspect is also important. I just don't think there's a such thing as a high quality woman. What I believe you have are women who have POOR quality based on their attitude, horrible finances, multiple kids, weight issues, etc., etc.

But when you guys discuss these super high quality women, it's as if you are describing someone who doesn't:

- Get periods
- Have stank breath in the morning
- Have to wash her a.ss or else it stanks
- Have to wash under her arms, or else she's musty
- Have to wear artificial things such as make-up and more, to continually look "beautiful"

I also think the argument that once I start wearing fancy suits, these high quality women will appear, also makes no sense. Do I have to keep wearing fancy suits for her a.ss to respect me lol?

Again, in NO MEANS am I being an a.sshole right now, argumentative, or just a dyck. I'm trying to continue this conversation and also ask deeper/follow-up questions because the bottom line is that THIS conversation helps every MAN on this forum.

This conversation is far more productive than any of the other Red Pill related threads we've had here lately.

You're so convinced that your own experience is the only reality that can exist. You tend to speak in absolutes based on limited experience. I'm not putting you down... this is just my observation as to why you are confounded by all this. Hey, I was just as confounded at age 50!

Forget all those absolutes. When you have a story, brother, you are locked into that book and you'll never get out.

Erase your history; erase your story. You need to hit the reset switch and accept the possibility that anything is possible.

 

[Atom Smasher]

Granting that. However, I think it is more difficult for a woman to break away from media because she is more prone to stimulation. Man is a more reflective being. Though we share both qualities, the masculine or feminine trait predominates [I love how you can be non-PC here.. ha ha]. If this is the case, then a woman may require a man in order to aid her in being truly grounded. Thinking of the great chain of being thing....

It is true that it is immensely difficult and unlikely for a women to break from the social pressures that work ruthlessly to define her. Almost all women obtain self-definition from forces outside of themselves, unlike men, who have much more of an internal locus of control.

That's why a breakout woman is a rare and valuable find. I do believe a woman does indeed require a man to complete her and to ground her.

Much of my past writing covers that. Women are the stormy ocean, naturally without definition or form. Men are the rocky shoreline, the entity that limits and therefore defines them. The shoreline, when functioning properly, says to the ocean, "This far, and no farther!" and the ocean obeys. Without the shore, the ocean will dissipate over the land to one molecule deep, and then evaporate. This is what we are witnessing today.

 

[Atom Smasher]

^^^ THIS right here.

This is the same thing I've been scratching my head saying. Where are these super, duper, high quality women at in general? Do they all sleep in caves and when the super, duper, high quality man walks out of the house....they all run out?

This conversation is far more productive than any of the other Red Pill related threads we've had here lately.

They are completely, utterly invisible to you, because you're not ready to perceive them. They are phantoms.

And you are a phantom to them, a complete non-entity, just some thing to walk around and avoid on the street. They are exceedingly rare, but are scattered about and invisible because you and they are phantoms today.

Tomorrow, if you play your cards right, you will become flesh and blood with almost "supernatural" properties to these women who can't even see you now. You will seem "supernatural" to them because they will know how incredibly rare such men are. They will hang on your every word and wonder in awe at every aspect of your masculine character.

When that happens, they will make themselves visible to you, and you will NOT have to play the mind games you have to play today.

Most men here walk around as phantoms, having to do the monkey dance... "Notice me! Notice me!"

We need to eject from that paradigm and instead notice and get to know ourselves and how we can be men of virtue and character.

Turn your back and hit "reset". The girls we tend to go after always end up being quite beneath us and act in appallingly bratty ways, don't they?

Wise is the man who makes them disappear and makes the exceedingly rare quality ones appear.

Easier said than done, I know, but most assuredly do-able.

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

It is true that it is immensely difficult and unlikely for a women to break from the social pressures that work ruthlessly to define her. Almost all women obtain self-definition from forces outside of themselves, unlike men, who have much more of an internal locus of control.

That's why a breakout woman is a rare and valuable find. I do believe a woman does indeed require a man to complete her and to ground her.

Much of my past writing covers that. Women are the stormy ocean, naturally without definition or form. Men are the rocky shoreline, the entity that limits and therefore defines them. The shoreline, when functioning properly, says to the ocean, "This far, and no farther!" and the ocean obeys. Without the shore, the ocean will dissipate over the land to one molecule deep, and then evaporate. This is what we are witnessing today.

Yes, but I think there is also a mysterious way in which the feminine can 'complete', no complement, the masculine. Our language becomes more metaphorical, more sea-like, where the meaning is merely encapsulated for the moment by words. There is a state of flow, and a plenitude of meaning running through all things. Contrast this to the rigidly masculine and ideological thought that developed with the continental land-based culture [divorced from the old Mediterranean sea-centred culture], where eventually all meaning eroded away for the sake of naked power.

 

[l_e_g_e_n_d]

^^^ THIS right here.

This is the same thing I've been scratching my head saying. Where are these super, duper, high quality women at in general? Do they all sleep in caves and when the super, duper, high quality man walks out of the house....they all run out?

The part about the gold-digging aspect is also important. I just don't think there's a such thing as a high quality woman. What I believe you have are women who have POOR quality based on their attitude, horrible finances, multiple kids, weight issues, etc., etc.

But when you guys discuss these super high quality women, it's as if you are describing someone who doesn't:

- Get periods
- Have stank breath in the morning
- Have to wash her a.ss or else it stanks
- Have to wash under her arms, or else she's musty
- Have to wear artificial things such as make-up and more, to continually look "beautiful"

I also think the argument that once I start wearing fancy suits, these high quality women will appear, also makes no sense. Do I have to keep wearing fancy suits for her a.ss to respect me lol?

Again, in NO MEANS am I being an a.sshole right now, argumentative, or just a dyck. I'm trying to continue this conversation and also ask deeper/follow-up questions because the bottom line is that THIS conversation helps every MAN on this forum.

This conversation is far more productive than any of the other Red Pill related threads we've had here lately.

Have you gotten there before, that is met this quality girl? No?

What about Poon King? Did he get there before? No?

What about Atom Smasher? Yes?

I met a handful myself. My stories are in the other thread if you care to look.

Now who do you listen to: To those who have never gotten there--or--to those who have?

Think about it.

 

[Atom Smasher]

"When youth comes to age for advice, he receives the wisdom of years. But too often does youth think that age only knows the wisdom of days that are gone, and therefore profits not. But remember this, the sun that shines today is the sun that shone when thy father was born, and will still be shining when thy last grandchild passes into the darkness. The thoughts of youth are bright lights that shine forth like the meteors that oft make brilliant the sky, but the wisdom of age is like the fixed stars that shine so unchanged that the sailor may depend upon them to steer his course."

Algemish
The Richest Man in Babylon