( . )( . ) said:
Rock on !!
Look mate I'll be fair, your probably a good bloke and all but a moderator of a site dedicated to the gaining and understanding of snatch should at least know the basic sh!t, from what I've seen the pissing in pockets and touchy feely feel good stuff to gain your "rep" aside, your understanding is lacking.No offence...a forum dedicated to the latest goings on in Hollywood or something, yeah you would be a killer mod. But here? Come on, you know I'm right.
Here's something to consider, could it be possible that your premise on what this site should be about a bit different from many (but not all) of the other members of the forum? That the will of women must be conquered in order to gain their affection? That women are so such enigmas that the only way that the average guy can't compete by any means other than force?
I see it from another angle. Why not level the playing field? Why not understand how women operate while enhancing our own qualities in order to not only differentiate ourselves from the DJ at the next table, but also feel good about ourselves without putting the guy down? How's that for feel good? But when women are in the presence of a guy with this type of character, she sees it as confidence and self control. Not saying that this is the only way to attract women, it's just an option which works for me (and probably a couple of other guys in the forum).
I'm not one to put the presence of women in life as the defining factor of my quality of life. The quality comes from me feeling good about myself and that is what I expound in this forum. I've yet to pick up a woman when I have a piss poor attitude. I'm guessing that many guys have a bad attitude about women because they feel that there is an actual battle between the sexes, and they feel that they are losing.
So call it "feel good," "Zen-like" or whatever. It works [for me] because women do not define who I am. I'm guessing that is the thing that makes us different and is possibly why LMS surprised you with his post which he recognized my composure online (at least
most of the time) and my lack of always focusing on women. I may be wrong but let's face facts, you're the one who's screen name is a graphic depiction of a part of a woman's anatomy (talk about Freudian).
I didn't mean to make this a lecture and I'm not saying anything that other guys haven't posted already (thanks guys). Being a Mod is about looking out for the best interest of the forum and you recognize this. Just because we have different views on sarging women is just that, a difference; don't make it into more than what it really is.